Enhancing Allicin bioavailability by way of cyclodextrin encapsulation: simulation and experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the compatibility, inclusion stability, and solubility of Allicin with three types of cyclodextrins (β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD), and 2,6-dimethyl-β-cyclodextrin (DM-β-CD)), using molecular simulation and experimental methods. Molecular dynamics simulations were employed to calculate solubility parameters, binding energy, mean square displacement, and hydrogen bonding of the three inclusion complexes (ICs). The mixing energy was calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. The smallest difference in solubility parameters was observed between DM-β-CD and Allicin, indicating superior compatibility. DM-β-CD exhibited the highest binding energy and strongest interaction, signifying greater inclusion stability. Fourier transform infrared spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, and differential scanning calorimetry analyses confirmed the successful formation of the three ICs. Phase solubility tests revealed that all three cyclodextrins formed 1:1 IC with Allicin, consistent with the simulated IC model. DM-β-CD and Allicin demonstrated higher solubility, indicating the best compatibility. Compared with pure Allicin, the solubility of Allicin increased by 5.6 times, 17.59 times, and 12 times in the Allicin/β-CD IC, Allicin/DM-β-CD IC, and Allicin/HP-β-CD IC, respectively. Inclusion stability constant (Ks) value for Allicin/DM-β-CD IC was the highest at 1555.9 M−1. These results indicate that the Allicin/DM-β-CD ICs exhibit the best stability, which is consistent with the simulation findings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Garlic and Onion Studies · Phytochemical compounds biological activities
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials, Electronics, and Energy Storage, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China (corresponding author: )
School of Materials, Electronics, and Energy Storage, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China
Graduate student, School of Materials, Electronics, and Energy Storage, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/fsn3.325310.1002/fsn3.3253 ↗
2. 10.3390/molecules2606150510.3390/molecules26061505 ↗
3. 10.3390/antiox1101008710.3390/antiox11010087 ↗
4. 10.3390/v1505105010.3390/v15051050 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jep.2018.12.00810.1016/j.jep.2018.12.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.03.01010.1016/j.tifs.2016.03.010 ↗
7. 10.3390/molecules2508194710.3390/molecules25081947 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.10611810.1016/j.phrs.2022.106118 ↗
9. 10.1080/10408398.2022.215379310.1080/10408398.2022.2153793 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.04310.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.043 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.2c0008010.1021/acsfoodscitech.2c00080 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1905610.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19056 ↗
13. 10.3390/antiox703003510.3390/antiox7030035 ↗
14. 10.1049/nbt2.1214210.1049/nbt2.12142 ↗
15. 10.1111/1750-3841.1588210.1111/1750-3841.15882 ↗
16. 10.3390/molecules2305116110.3390/molecules23051161 ↗
17. 10.3390/separations1105014310.3390/separations11050143 ↗
18. Fei Y · Current Organic Chemistry · 2017 · 21
19. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.11944210.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119442 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.01110.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10521810.1016/j.microc.2020.105218 ↗
22. 10.1039/D4RA01370K10.1039/D4RA01370K ↗
23. Su J · Journal of Food Science · 2012 · 77 · C658
24. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.13235910.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132359 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.13631610.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136316 ↗
26. 10.3389/fnut.2023.130878710.3389/fnut.2023.1308787 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.11029310.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110293 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.10918110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109181 ↗
29. 10.1088/1757-899X/902/1/01201710.1088/1757-899X/902/1/012017 ↗
30. 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_298_2010.4103/japtr.JAPTR_298_20 ↗
31. 10.3390/ijms2217942210.3390/ijms22179422 ↗
32. Yang K · PloS One · 2016 · 11 · e015604310.1371/journal.pone.0156043 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0255010.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02550 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.13416810.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134168 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10847-016-0638-810.1007/s10847-016-0638-8 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.12551510.1016/j.molliq.2024.125515 ↗
37. 10.1080/08927022.2021.199192110.1080/08927022.2021.1991921 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.12810.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.128 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.13517410.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135174 ↗
40. 10.1002/ardp.20230061210.1002/ardp.202300612 ↗
41. 10.1039/C9CP03155C10.1039/C9CP03155C ↗
42. Yu T · Npj Computational Materials · 2024 · 10 · 1510.1038/s41524-023-01193-3 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c0135110.1021/acs.cgd.0c01351 ↗
44. 10.1039/D3RA08936C10.1039/D3RA08936C ↗
45. 10.1208/s12249-019-1425-910.1208/s12249-019-1425-9 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.12370010.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123700 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.00310.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.003 ↗