High Strain Rate Response of Sandwich Composites with Nanophased Cores
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyurethane foam materials have been used as core materials in a sandwich construction with S2-Glass/SC-15 facings. The foam material has been manufactured from liquid polymer precursors of polyurethane. The precursors are made of two components; part-A (diphenylmethane diisocyanate) and part-B (polyol). In one set of experiments, part-A was mixed with part-B to manufacture the foam. In another set, TiO2 nanoparticles have been dispersed in part-A through ultrasonic cavitation technique. The loading of nanoparticles was 3% by weight of the total polymer precursor. The TiO2 nanoparticles were spherical in shape, and were about 29 nm in diameter. Sonic cavitation was carried out with a vibrasound liquid processor at 20 kHz frequency with a power intensity of about 100 kW/m2. The two categories of foams manufactured in this manner were termed as neat and nanophased. Sandwich composites were then fabricated using these two categories of core materials using a co-injection resin transfer molding (CIRTM) technique. Test samples extracted from the panel were subjected to quasi-static as well as high strain rate loadings. Rate of loading varied from 0.002 s−1 to around 1300 s−1. It has been observed that infusion of nanoparticles had a direct correlation with the cell geometry. The cell dimensions increased by about 46% with particle infusion suggesting that nanoparticles might have worked as catalysts during the foaming process. Correspondingly, enhancement in thermal properties was also noticed especially in the TGA experiments. There was also a significant improvement in mechanical properties due to nanoparticle infusion. Average increase in sandwich strength and energy absorption with nanophased cores was between 40–60% over their neat counterparts. Details of manufacturing and analyses of thermal and mechanical tests are presented in this paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Lipatov, Y. S., ‘Relaxation and Viscoelastic Properties of Heterogeneous Polymeric Composites’, Advanced Polymeric Sciences 22, 1977, 1–59.10.1007/3-540-07942-4_4 ↗
2. Lipatov, Y. S., Mezhfaznie Yavleniya v Polimerah, ‘Interphase Phenomena in Polymers’, Kiev, 1980.
3. Antonietti, M. and Göltner, C. ‘Superstructures of Functional Colloids: Chemistry on the Nanometer Scale’, Angewandte Chemie International Edition Engl. 36, 1997, 910–928.10.1002/anie.199709101 ↗
4. Schmid, G., ‘Clusters and Colloids – from Theory to Applications’, VCH, Weinheim, 1994.10.1002/9783527616077 ↗
5. Roy, R., ‘Purposive Design of Nanocomposites: Entire Class of New Materials’, Materials Science Research 21, 1986, 25.
6. Wnag, Q., Xia, H. and Zhang, C., ‘Preparation of Polymer/Inorganic Nanoparticles Composites Through Ultrasonic Irradiation’, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 80, 2001, 1478–1488.10.1002/app.1239 ↗
7. Eskin, G. I., ‘Influence of Cavitation Treatment of Melts on the Processes of Nucleation and Growth of Crystals during Solidification of Ingots and Castings from Light Alloys’, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 1(1), 1994, S59–S63.10.1016/1350-4177(94)90029-9 ↗
8. Eskin, G. I., ‘Cavitation Mechanism of Ultrasonic Melt Degassing’, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2(2), 1995, S137–S141.10.1016/1350-4177(95)00020-7 ↗
9. Eskin, G. I., ‘Broad Prospects for Commercial Application of the Ultrasonic (Cavitation) Melt Treatment of Light Alloys’, Ultrasonic Sonochemistry 8, 2001, 319–325.10.1016/S1350-4177(00)00074-2 ↗
10. ‘Light Comes From Ultrasonic Cavitation in Picosecond Pulses’, Physics Today 44(11), November 1991.10.1063/1.2810317 ↗
11. Price, G. J., ‘Recent Developments in Sonochemical Polymerization’, Ultrasonics Sono-chemistry 10, 2003, 277–283.10.1016/S1350-4177(02)00156-6 ↗
12. Mahfuz, H., Islam, M., Rangari, V., Saha, M. and Jeelani, S., ‘Response of Sandwich Composites with Nanophased Cores under Flexural Loading’, Composites Part B: Engineering 35, 2004, 543–550.10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.004 ↗
13. Mahfuz, H., Islam, M. S., Rangari, V., Salekeen, S. and Jeelani, S., ‘Fabrication, Synthesis and Mechanical Characterization of Nanoparticles Infused Polyurethane Foams’, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 35(4), 2004, 453–460.10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.009 ↗
14. Zilg, C., Thomann, R., Mulhaupt, R. and Finter, J., ‘Polyurethane Nanocomposites Containing Laminated Anisotropic Nanoparticles Derived from Organophilic Layered Silicates’, Advanced Materials 11(1), 1999, 49–52.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199901)11:1<49::AID-ADMA49>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
15. Peterovic, Z. S., Javni, I., Waddon, A. and Banhegyi, G., ‘Structure and Properties of Polyurethane-Silica Nanocomposites’, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 76, 2000, 133–151.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000411)76:2<133::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
16. Javni, I., Zhang, W., Karajkov, V. and Petrovic, Z. S., ‘Effect of Nano- and Micro-Silica Fillers on Polyurethane Foam Properties’, Journal of Cellular Plastics 38, 2002, 229–239.10.1177/0021955X02038003139 ↗
17. Utah Foam Product Inc., Nephi, Utah, USA.
18. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, Burr Ridge, IL, USA.
19. Applied Poleramic, Inc., ‘Material Data Sheet: SC-15’, USA.
20. Choe, H. K., Lee, D. S., Seo, W. J. and Kim, W. N., ‘Properties of Rigid Polyurethane Foams with Blowing Agents and Catalysts’, Polymer Journal 36(5), 2004, 368–373.10.1295/polymj.36.368 ↗