journal article·2007-01-31Open access

Damage Resistance of Composites Based on Glass Fibre Reinforced Low Styrene Emission Resins for Marine Applications

Y. Perrot, C. Baley, Y. Grohens, P. Davies

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Composites based on glass fiber reinforced low styrene emission polyester resins have been widely used over the last 10 years, in order to meet increasingly strict safety regulations, particularly in the pleasure boat industry. Previous studies of their mechanical properties suggested that although these resins are generally more brittle than traditional orthophthalic polyester resins this did not adversely affect the properties commonly used for quality control (short beam shear and tensile failure strength of mat reinforced composites). In the present paper results from a more detailed study of damage behaviour are presented. Tests include fracture toughness (K Ic ) tests on resins, fibre/matrix interface energy, detection of composite damage initiation in tension by acoustic emission, composite delamnation (G Ic and G IIc ), and low energy impact. Overall the results indicate that the low failure strain of low styrene emission resins results in significantly lower composite damage resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Baley, C., Perrot, Y., Davies, P., Bourmaud, A., Grohens, Y.: Mechanical properties of composites based on low styrene emission polyester resins for marine applications. Appl. Compos. Mater. 13, 1–22 (2006)10.1007/s10443-005-9000-9 ↗
2. ISO 135 86: Plastics-Determination of fracture toughness (GIC and KIC)-Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. (2000)
3. Williams, J.G.: Stress analysis of polymers. Ellis Horwood series in engineering science, 2nd ed
4. Miller, B., Muri, P., Rebenfeld, L.: A microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fibre/resin interface. Compos. Sci. Technol. 28, 17–32 (1987)10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗
5. Scheer, R.J., Nairn J.A.: A comparison of several fracture mechanics methods for measuring interfacial toughness with microbond tests. J. Adhes. 53, 45–68 (1995)10.1080/00218469508014371 ↗
6. ISO 150 24-2001: Fibre-reinforced plastic composites-Determination of mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials
7. Berry, J.P.: Determination of fracture surface energies by the cleavage technique. J. Appl. Physi. 34, (1963)10.1063/1.1729091 ↗
8. Martin, R.H., Davidson, B.D.: Mode II fracture toughness evaluation using a four point bend end notched flexure test. In: 4th International on Deformation and Fracture of Composites, pp. 243–252. Manchester (1997)
9. Compston, P., Jar, P.-Y.B., Davies, P.: Matrix effect on the static and dynamic interlaminar fracture toughness of glass-fiber marine composites. Compos., Part B 29B, 505–516 (1998)10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00004-3 ↗
10. Baley, C., Davies, P., Grohens, Y., Dolto, G.: Application of interlaminar tests to marine composites. A review. Appl. Compos. Mater. 11, 96–126 (2004)
11. Diran, X., Hilaire, B., Soulier, J.P., Nardin, M.: Interfacial shear strength in glass-fibre/vinylester-resin composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 56, 533–539 (1996)10.1016/0266-3538(96)00040-1 ↗
12. Venkatakrishnaiah, S., Dharani, L.R.: Interfacial stresses in a microbond pull-out specimen. Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids 13, 311–325 (1994)
13. Liu, C.H., Nairn, J.A.: Analytical and experimental methods for a fracture mechanics interpretation of microbond test including the effects of friction and thermal stresses. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 19, 59–70 (1999)10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00057-8 ↗
14. Ash, J.T., Cross, W.M., Svalstad, D., Kellar, J.J., Kjerengtroen, L.: Finite element evaluation of the microbond test: meniscus effect, interphase region, and vise angle. Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 641–651 (2003)10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00256-7 ↗
15. Roselli, F., Santare, M.H.: Comparison of the short beam shear (SBS) and interlaminar shear device (ISD) Tests. Compos., Part A 28A, 587–594 (1997)10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00009-2 ↗
16. Hoecker, F., Friedrich, K., Blumberg, H., Karger-Kocsis, J.: Effects of fiber/matrix adhesion on off-axis mechanical response in carbon-fiber/epoxy-resin composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 54, 317–327 (1995)10.1016/0266-3538(95)00058-5 ↗
17. Herrera-Franco, P.J., Drazl, L.T.: Comparison of methods for the measurement of fibre/matrix adhesion in composites. Composites 23, 2–27 (1992)10.1016/0010-4361(92)90282-Y ↗
18. Davies, P., Petton, D.: An experimental study of scale effects in marine composites. Compos., Part A 30, 267–275 (1999)10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00156-0 ↗
19. Meraghni, F., Benzeggagh, M.L.: Micromechanical modelling of matrix degradation in randomly oriented discontinuous-fibre composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 55, 171–186 (1995)10.1016/0266-3538(95)00096-8 ↗
20. Yamini, S., Young, R.J.: Stability of crack propagation in epoxy resins. Polymer 18, 1075–1080 (1977)10.1016/0032-3861(77)90016-7 ↗
21. Kinloch, A.J., Williams, J.G.: Crack blunting mechanisms in polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 15, 987–996 (1980)10.1007/BF00552112 ↗
22. Brunellière, O., Davies, P.: Effects of defects on interlaminar fracture of glass fibre reinforced polyester composites. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12, 427–429 (1993)10.1007/BF00609174 ↗
23. Davies, P., Cantwell, W., Moulin, C., Kausch, H.H.: A study of the delamination resistance of IM6/PEEK composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 36, 153–166 (1989)10.1016/0266-3538(89)90085-7 ↗
24. Prel, Y.J., Davies, P., Benzeggagh, M.L., De Charentenay, F.X.: Mode I and mode II delamination of thermosetting and thermoplastic composites. In: 2nd ASTM Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture, pp. 69–251. Cincinnati, ASTM STP 1012 (1989)10.1520/STP10419S ↗
25. Feih, S., Wei, J., Kingshott, P., Sorensen, B.F.: The influence of fibre sizing on the strength and fracture toughness of glass fibre composites. Compos., Part A 36, 245–255 (2005)10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00170-8 ↗
26. Davies, P., Blackman, B.R.K., Brunner, A.J.: Standard test methods for delamination resistance of composite materials: current status. Appl. Compos. Mater. 5, 345–364 (1998)10.1023/A:1008869811626 ↗
27. Hunston, D.L.: Composite interlaminar fracture: Effect of matrix fracture energy. Comp. Tech. Rev., ASTM 6 4, 176–180 (1984)
28. Yee, A.F.: Modifying matrix materials for tougher composites. In: Johnston, N.J. (ed.) ASTM STP, 937, pp. 383–396. (1987)10.1520/STP24389S ↗
29. Masters, J.E.: Correlation of impact and delamination resistance in interleafed laminates. In: Proc. ICCM6 vol. 3, pp. 96–107. (1987)