journal article·2025-02Open access

Effect of Embedded Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) on the Low-velocity Impact Behaviour of Stringer Stiffened Composite Plates

Tristan Brack, Hessam Ghasemnejad

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 32· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract This study presents an analytical model of low-velocity impact on composite plates, possessing either flat or cylindrical shapes. The overall plate`s stiffness properties are varied with an additionally assembled Ω-stringer and embedded shape memory alloy wires in the composite material, using only the shape memory effect. This analytical approach enables a low-effort but sufficiently accurate design of low-energy-impacted structures. Comprehensive analytical equations are developed based on the inclusion of the stringer effect on the curved panels. For both stringer-stiffened and non-stiffened plate models, parameter variations regarding the impact and shape memory alloy (SMA) wire integration are conducted. The effects can be classified as changes in essential and acquired stiffness. Our results indicate that SMAs improve the energy absorption capability of stiffened composite panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim, H.E., Rim, S.M., Lee, I., Hwang, K.T.: Composite damage model based on continuum damage mechanics and low velocity impact analysis of composite plates. Compos. Struct. 95, 123–134 (2013)10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.002 ↗
2. Singh, H., Mahajan, P.: Analytical modelling of low velocity large mass impact on composite plate including damage evolution. Compos. Struct. 149, 79–92 (2016)10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.009 ↗
3. Olsson, R.: Analytical prediction of large mass impact damage in composite laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 32(9), 1207–1215 (2001)10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00073-2 ↗
4. Choi, I.H.: Geometrically nonlinear transient analysis of composite laminated plate and shells subjected to low-velocity impact. Compo. Struct. 142, 7–14 (2016)10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.070 ↗
5. Khalili, S., Shokuhfar, A., Ashenai Ghasemi, F., Malekzadeh, K.: Dynamic Response of Smart Hybrid Composite Plate Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact. J. Compos. Mater. 41, 2347–2370 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830707545310.1177/0021998307075453 ↗
6. Khalili, S., Botshekanan Dehkordi, M., Carrera, E.: A nonlinear finite element model using a unified formulation for dynamic analysis of multilayer composite plate embedded with SMA wires. Compos. Struct. 106, 635–645 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.006 ↗
7. Arachchige, B., Ghasemnejad, H., Augousti, A.T.: Theoretical approach to predict transverse impact response of variable-stiffness curved composite plates. Compos. B Eng. 89, 34–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.03610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.036 ↗
8. Arachchige B.: Theoretical approach to predict transverse impact on variable stiffness curved composite plates. PhD Thesis, Cranfield Univer (2017)10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.018 ↗
9. Arachchige, B., Ghasemnejad, H.: Effect of variable core stiffness on the impact response of curved sandwich plates. Compos. Struct. 200, 565–578 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.15010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.150 ↗
10. Arachchige, B., Ghasemnejad, H.: Post impact analysis of damaged variable-stiffness curved composite plates. Compos. Struct. 166, 12–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.018 ↗
11. Al Ali A, Arhore E, Ghasemnejad H & Yasaee M.: Experimental and numerical investigation of multi-layered honeycomb sandwich composites forimpact mechanics applications. Results in Engineering. 21, (2024)10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101817 ↗
12. Chao Correas, A., Ghasemnejad, H.: Analytical development on impact behaviour of composite sandwich laminates by differentiated loading regimes. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 126, 107658 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.10765810.1016/j.ast.2022.107658 ↗
13. Correas, A.C., Crespo, A.C., Ghasemnejad, H., Roshan, G.: Analytical Solutions to Predict Impact Behaviour of Stringer Stiffened Composite Aircraft Panels. Appl. Compos. Mater. 28, 1237–1254 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09909-810.1007/s10443-021-09909-8 ↗
14. Song, Z., Le, J., Whisler, D., Kim, H.: Skin-stringer interface failure investigation of stringer-stiffened curved composite panels under hail ice impact. Int. J. Impact Eng 122, 439–450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.09.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.09.014 ↗
15. Rout, M., Karmakar, A.: Low Velocity Impact Performance of Delaminated Composite Stiffened Shell. Proc. Eng. 173, 306–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.02110.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.021 ↗
16. Sun, W., Guan, Z., Ouyang, T., Tan, R., Zhong, X.: Effect of stiffener damage caused by low velocity impact on compressive buckling and failure modes of T-stiffened composite panels. Compos. Struct. 184, 198–210 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.08410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.084 ↗
17. Khalili, S., Ardali, A.: Low-velocity impact response of doubly curved symmetric cross-ply laminated panel with embedded SMA wires. Compos. Struct. 105, 216–226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.041 ↗
18. Rogers C., Liang C., Jia J.: Behavior of shape memory alloy reinforced composite plates. I - Model formulations and control concepts, in: 30th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Mobile,AL,U.S.A, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, 04031989.
19. Birman, V., Chandrashekhara, K., Sain, S.: An approach to optimization of shape memory alloy hybrid composite plates subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos. B Eng. 27, 439–446 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-8368(96)00010-810.1016/1359-8368(96)00010-8 ↗
20. Khalili, S., Shokuhfar, A., Ghasemi, F.A.: Effect of smart stiffening procedure on low-velocity impact response of smart structures. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 190, 142–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.05210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.052 ↗
21. Khalili, S., Shokuhfar, A., Malekzadeh, K., Ashenai Ghasemi, F.: Low-velocity impact response of active thin-walled hybrid composite structures embedded with SMA wires. Thin-Walled Struct. 45, 799–808 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2007.01.01710.1016/j.tws.2007.01.017 ↗
22. Khalili, S., Botshekanan Dehkordi, M., Shariyat, M.: Modeling and transient dynamic analysis of pseudoelastic SMA hybrid composite beam. Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 9762–9782 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.09210.1016/j.amc.2013.03.092 ↗
23. Ozair, H., Baluch, A.H., Ur Rehman, M.A., A.: Wadood, Shape Memory Hybrid Composites, ACS. Omega 7, 36052–36069 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0243610.1021/acsomega.2c02436 ↗
24. Guida, M., Sellitto, A., Marulo, F., Riccio, A.: Analysis of the Impact Dynamics of Shape Memory Alloy Hybrid Composites for Advanced Applications. Materials (Basel) 12, 153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1201015310.3390/ma12010153 ↗
25. Fischer, F.D., Tanaka, K.: A micromechanical model for the kinetics of martensitic transformation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 29, 1723–1728 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90165-P10.1016/0020-7683(92)90165-P ↗
26. Liang, C., Rogers, C.A.: One-Dimensional Thermomechanical Constitutive Relations for Shape Memory Materials. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 1, 207–234 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X900010020510.1177/1045389X9000100205 ↗
27. Lin, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-L., Chen, H.-W.: Parametric Studies of Shape Memory Alloy Hybrid Composite Laminates Under Low-Velocity Impact. J. mech. 32, 565–577 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/jmech.2016.2410.1017/jmech.2016.24 ↗
28. Roh, J.-H., Kim, J.-H.: Adaptability of hybrid smart composite plate under low velocity impact. Compos. B Eng. 34, 117–125 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00098-710.1016/S1359-8368(02)00098-7 ↗
29. Reddy, J.N.: Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2007)
30. Correas A.C.: Analytical modelling of low-velocity impacts on composite laminates. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University (2020)
31. Mindlin, R.D.: Influence of Rotatory Inertia and Shear on Flexural Motions of Isotropic, Elastic Plates. J. Appl. Mech. 18, 31–38 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.401021710.1115/1.4010217 ↗
32. Vaziri, R., Quan, X., Olson, M.D.: Impact analysis of laminated composite plates and shells by super finite elements. Int. J. Impact Eng 18, 765–782 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(96)00030-910.1016/S0734-743X(96)00030-9 ↗