The Effect of Nozzle Geometry on the Structure and Properties of 3D Printed Carbon Polyamide Composites

Boris Lizenboim; Samuel Kenig; Naum Naveh

doi:10.1007/s10443-023-10166-0

journal article·2024-02

The Effect of Nozzle Geometry on the Structure and Properties of 3D Printed Carbon Polyamide Composites

Boris Lizenboim, Samuel Kenig, Naum Naveh

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 31· Issue 1

Publisher page

Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Composites Materials processing

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references

1. Crump, S.: Modeling Apparatus for three-dimensional Objects. US5340433A (1989)

2. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T.Q., Hui, D.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗

3. Blok, L.G., Longana, M.L., Yu, H., Woods, B.K.S.: An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Addit. Manuf. 22, 176–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗

4. Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., Hui, D.: 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos. Part B Eng. 110, 442–458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗

5. Parandoush, P., Lin, D.: A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos. Struct. 182, 36–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗

6. Carneiro, O.S., Silva, A.F., Gomes, R.: Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater. Des. 83, 768–776 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.05310.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053 ↗

7. Brenken, B., Barocio, E., Favaloro, A., Pipes, R.B., Kunc, V.: Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review. Addit. Manuf. 21, 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗

8. Mason, T.O., Lee, J.A.: Brick and tile. Encycl. Br. (2019)

9. Tadmor, Z., Costas, G.G.: Principles of polymer processing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118480793.ch2310.1002/9781118480793.ch23 ↗

10. Han, C.D.: Rheology of shaped fiber formation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 15, 1091–1097 (1971)10.1002/app.1971.070150505 ↗

11. Lee, Y., Park, J., Lee, N.K., Lee, H., Park, S., Lee, J.-E., Park, S.: Fdm-3d printer nozzle, KR101867433B1, (2020)

12. Lee, H.J., Munm, Y.-U., Kwon, O.C., Cho, W., Seok, S.C., Yoon, A.A., Lee, H.: Nozzle for materials extrusion type 3d printer, KR101826024B1, (2020)10.1155/2020/8846466 ↗

13. Saito, K., Mizukami, S., Nakamura, K.: Three-dimensional molding apparatus and three-dimensional molding method. JP2018187777A (2020)

14. Koch, C., Van Hulle, L., Rudolph, N.: Investigation of mechanical anisotropy of the fused filament fabrication process via customized tool path generation. Addit. Manuf. 16, 138–145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.00310.1016/j.addma.2017.06.003 ↗

15. Liao, G., Li, Z., Cheng, Y., Xu, D., Zhu, D., Jiang, S., Guo, J., Chen, X., Xu, G., Zhu, Y.: Properties of oriented carbon fiber / polyamide 12 composite parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater. Des. 139, 283–292 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02710.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.027 ↗

16. Mark, G.T.: Embedding 3D printed fiber reinforcement in molded articles, US10682844B2, (2017)

17. Etcheverry, M., Barbosa, S.E.: Glass fiber reinforced polypropylene mechanical properties enhancement by adhesion improvement. Mater. (Basel) 5, 1084–1113 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma506108410.3390/ma5061084 ↗

18. Gupta, V.B., Mittal, R.K., Sharma, P.K., Kuns, D., Part, I.: Reduction in Fiber length during Processing. Polym. Compos. 8–15 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.75010010310.1002/pc.750100103 ↗

19. Mortazavian, S., Fatemi, A.: Effects of fiber orientation and anisotropy on tensile strength and elastic modulus of short fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 72, 116–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.04110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.041 ↗

20. Chiu, W.Y., Shyu, G.-D.: The study on nozzle swell, Fiber length distribution, and crystallinity of PP composite through Extrusion. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 34, 1493–1501 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1987.07034041310.1002/app.1987.070340413 ↗

21. Gupta, V.B., Mittal, R.K., Sharma, P.K.: Some studies on Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene. Part II: Mechanical Properties and their dependence on Fiber length, interfacial adhesion, and Fiber adhesion. Polym. Compos. 10, 16–27 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.75010010410.1002/pc.750100104 ↗

22. Belei, C., Joeressen, J., Amancio-Filho, S.T.: Fused-filament fabrication of short carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide: parameter optimization for improved performance under uniaxial tensile loading. Polymers 14, 1292 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1407129210.3390/polym14071292 ↗

23. Muhamedagic, K., Berus, L., Potocnik, D., Cekic, A., Begic-Hajdarevic, D., Cohodar Husic, M., Ficko, M.: Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed carbon fiber reinforced polyamide parts. Appl. Sci. 12, 6028 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1212602810.3390/app12126028 ↗

24. Ozen, A., Abali, B.E., Vollmecke, C., Gerstel, J., Using, P.E.T.G.: Appl. Comp. Mat. 28, 1799–1828 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09940-910.1007/s10443-021-09940-9 ↗

25. Moradi, M., Aminzadeh, A., Rahmatabadi, D., Hakimi, A.: Experimental investigation on mechanical characterization of 3D printed PLA produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Mater. Res. Express 8, 035304 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abe8f310.1088/2053-1591/abe8f3 ↗

26. Markforged: Markforged Materials Datasheet Composites. (2021)

27. ASTM D638: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14.110.1520/D0638-14.1 ↗

28. ASTM D2344/D2344M: Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. (2016)

29. Ehrenstein, G.W., Riedel, G., Trawiel, P.: Thermal analysis of plastics, 1st edn. Hanser, Munich (2004)10.3139/9783446434141 ↗

30. ASTM D3418: Standard test method for transition temperatures and enthalpies of fusion and crystallization of polymers by differential scanning calorimetry. (2015)

31. Coogan, T.J., Kazmer, D.O.: In-line rheological monitoring of fused deposition modeling. 141, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1122/1.505464810.1122/1.5054648 ↗

32. Phan, D.D., Swain, Z.R., Mackay, M.E.: Rheological and heat transfer effects in fused filament fabrication. J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y.) 62, 1097 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1122/1.502298210.1122/1.5022982 ↗

33. Mackay, M.E.: The importance of rheological behavior in the additive manufacturing technique material extrusion. J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y.) 62, 1549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1122/1.503768710.1122/1.5037687 ↗

34. Mackay, M.E., Swain, Z.R., Banburydavid, C.R., Edwards, D.P.A., Edwards, D.A.: The performance of the hot end in a plasticating 3D printer the performance of the hot end in a plasticating 3D printer. J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y.) 61, 229 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1122/1.497385210.1122/1.4973852 ↗

35. Dealy, J.M., Read, D.J., Larson, R.G.: Structure and rheology of molten polymers, 2nd edn. Hanser (2018)10.3139/9781569906125.fm ↗

36. Dealy, J.M.: On the significance of pressure relaxations in capillary or slit flow. Rheol. Acta. 34, 115–116 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0039606010.1007/BF00396060 ↗

37. Hay, G., Mackay, M.E.: Pressure and temperature effects in slit rheometry. J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y.) 42, 1099 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1122/1.55104310.1122/1.551043 ↗

38. Laun, H.M.: Polymer melt rheology with a slit nozzle. Rheol. Acta. 22, 171–185 (1983)10.1007/BF01332370 ↗

39. Coogan, T.J., Kazmer, D.O.: Healing simulation for bond strength prediction of FDM. Rapid Prototyp. J. 23(3), (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-005110.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0051 ↗

40. O’Regan, M., Akay, M.B.: A comparison of Young’s modulus predictions in fibre-reinforced-polyamide injection mouldings. Compos. Sci. Technol. 59, 419–427 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00089-X10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00089-X ↗

41. Cox, H.: The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials, Br. J. Appl. Phys. (1951)10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗

42. Krenchel, H.: Fibre Reinforcement. Akad. Forl, Copenhagen (1964)

43. Daniel, I., Ishai, O.: Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, USA (2006)

44. Mark, J.E. (ed.): Polymer Data Handbook. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

45. McKeen, L.W.: Chap. 11 - Table of Poisson’s Ratios, in: McKeen LW (Ed.), Eff. Creep Other Time Relat. Factors Plast. Elastomers, 2nd ed., William Andrew Publishing, pp. 373–381. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-8155-1585-2.50013-310.1016/B978-0-8155-1585-2.50013-3 ↗

46. Sato, N., Kurauchi Sato, T.S., Osami, K.: Mechanism of fracture of short glass fibre-reinforced polyamide thermoplastic. J. Mater. Sci. 19, 1145–1152 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0112002310.1007/BF01120023 ↗