Evaluation of Flow-Mesh Influence in Resin Injection Processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Liquid molding is a versatile composite family of processes largely used in naval and automotive industries. In these processes, a polymeric resin is forced through a mold cavity previously filled with a reinforcement medium. In several cases, the impregnation stage may be too long and, to avoid that a flow-mesh (FM) may be placed over the reinforcement. This FM has very high permeability and high porosity, thus the resin first advances inside it and then impregnates the reinforcement medium. The FM commonly covers the entire reinforcement medium, however this may not the best solution for all situations, since it may produce an irregular resin flow front inside the mold cavity, resulting in void formation or waste of resin. This work performs a study on the most suitable FM length, in relation to the mold length, for rectilinear injections. Main goal is to produce a data set to determine FM length based on mold thickness and in-plane to transverse permeability ratio ( $$\uppsi ={K}xx/{K}zz$$ ). Results have shown that for common industrial application, where $$\uppsi \sim 10$$ , mold length must be 2.5 times as long as the FM for thick reinforcements. Moreover, for more extreme cases, with $$\uppsi \sim 1000$$ , this value may reach 25.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Drilling and Well Engineering · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Advani S.G., Sozer E.M.: Process Modeling in Composites Manufacturing. 2nd ed. CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group (2010)10.1201/b13142 ↗
2. Yenilmez, B., Senan, M., Murat, S.E.: Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol 69, 1710–1719 (2009)10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.009 ↗
3. Wang L.: Design with constructal theory, A. Bejan and S. Lorente, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2008, No. of pages: 529, ISBN 978–0–471–99816–7. Int J Energy Res 34, 743–744 (2010)10.1002/er.1587 ↗
4. Vilà, J., González, C., LLorca, J.: Fabric compaction and infiltration during vacuum-assisted resin infusion with and without distribution medium. J Compos Mater 51, 687–703 (2017)10.1177/0021998316649783 ↗
5. Correia, N.C., Robitaille, F., Long, A.C., et al.: Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 36, 1645–1656 (2005)10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.019 ↗
6. Rachmadini, Y., Tan, V.B.C., Tay, T.E.: Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of Composites through Incorporation of CNT in VARTM - A Review. J Reinf Plast Compos 29, 2782–2807 (2010)10.1177/0731684409359103 ↗
7. Sas, H.S., Šimáček, P., Advani, S.G.: A methodology to reduce variability during vacuum infusion with optimized design of distribution media. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 78, 223–233 (2015)10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.011 ↗
8. Agogue, R., Chebil, N., Deleglise-Lagardere, M., et al.: Efficient Permeability Measurement and Numerical Simulation of the Resin Flow in Low Permeability Preform Fabricated by Automated Dry Fiber Placement. Appl Compos Mater 25, 1169–1182 (2018)10.1007/s10443-017-9659-8 ↗
9. Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39, 201–225 (1981)10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 ↗
10. Weller H.: Greenshields C, de Rouvray C. The OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd. OpenFOAM, https://openfoam.org/
11. Geuzaine, C., Remacle, J.-F.: Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79, 1309–1331 (2009)10.1002/nme.2579 ↗
12. Nunes, S.G., de Amorim, W.F., Manes, A., et al.: The effect of thickness on vacuum infusion processing of aramid/epoxy composites for ballistic application. J Compos Mater 53, 383–391 (2019)10.1177/0021998318785702 ↗