journal article·2022-10Open access

Improvement of Force History Pattern in Composite Tubular Structures by Developed Trigger Mechanisms

J. J. de la Cuesta, H. Ghasemnejad

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 29· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the effect of various trigger mechanisms on the force history pattern, initial collapse load, mean force and specific energy absorption of CFRP composite tubular absorbers. These trigger mechanisms are bevel with angles of 15°, 30°, 45° and 60° and tulip with angles of 60° and 90° and tip numbers of 4 and 6. Experimental studies were performed for three trigger mechanisms of Bevel (B30° and B60°) and tulip with four tips and angle of 60°, 4T60. It was shown that tulip mechanisms significantly change the force–displacement pattern in comparison with bevel triggers. In this case, the initial collapse load decreases, which leads to improving the crush force efficiency (CFE) and progressive energy absorption. This analysis also contains numerical modelling, which investigates other designs of bevel and tulip trigger mechanisms with different angles. Finally, numerical results are validated against experimental results using advanced finite element techniques in LS-Dyna. The developed tulip trigger mechanisms indicated a significant change of crushing force history, which results in improvement of crashworthiness parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Mamalis, A.G., Manolakos, D.E., Demosthenous, G.A., Ioannidis, M.B.: Crashworthiness of Composite Thin-Walled Structural Components, 1st edn. Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster (1998)
2. Hull, D.: A Unified Approach to Progressive Crushing of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Tubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 40(4), 377–421 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J ↗
3. Farley, G.L., Jones, R.M.: Crushing Characteristics of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Composite Tubes. J. Compos. Mater. 26(1), 37–50 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983920260010310.1177/002199839202600103 ↗
4. Rabiee, A., Ghasemnejad, H.: Progressive Crushing of Polymer Matrix Composite Tubular Structures: Review. Open. J. Compos. Mater. 7(1), 14–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2017.7100210.4236/ojcm.2017.71002 ↗
5. Barbero, E.J.: Introduction to Composite Materials Design, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl (2011)
6. Hosseini, S.M., Shariati, M.: Experimental analysis of energy absorption capability of thin-walled composite cylindrical shells by quasi-static axial crushing test. Thin-Walled. Struct. 125, 259–268 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.02610.1016/j.tws.2018.01.026 ↗
7. Chiu, L.N.S., Falzon, B.G., Boman, R., Chen, B., Yan, W.: Finite element modelling of composite structures under crushing load. Compos. Struct. 131, 215–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.008 ↗
8. Yan, L., Chouw, N.: Crashworthiness characteristics of flax fibre reinforced epoxy tubes for energy absorption application. Mater. Des. 51, 629–640 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.01410.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.014 ↗
9. Atthapreyangkul, A., Gangadhara, P.B.: Experimental and numerical analysis on the geometrical parameters towards the maximum SEA of CFRP components. Compos. Struct. 164, 229–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.078 ↗
10. Farley, G.L.: Energy Absorption of Composite Materials. J. Compos. Mater. 17, 267–279 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983830170030710.1177/002199838301700307 ↗
11. Zhang, Z., Sun, W., Zhao, Y., Hou, S.: Crashworthiness of different composite tubes by experiments and simulations. Compos. B. 143, 86–95 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.021 ↗
12. Palanivelu, S., Van Paepegem, W., Degrieck, J., Kakogiannis, D., Van Ackeren, J., Van Hemelrijck, D., et al.: Comparative study of the quasi-static energy absorption of small-scale composite tubes with different geometrical shapes for use in sacrificial cladding structures. Compos. Struct. 29, 1–22 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.01.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.01.003 ↗
13. Jiménez, M.A., Miravete, A., Larrodé, E., Revuelta, D.: Effect of trigger geometry on energy absorption in composite profiles. Compos. Struct. 48(1), 107–111 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00081-110.1016/S0263-8223(99)00081-1 ↗
14. Ghasemnejad, H., Blackman, B.R.K., Hadavinia, H., Sudall, B.: Experimental studies on fracture characterisation and energy absorption of GFRP composite box structures. Compos. Struct. 88(2), 253–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.04.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.04.006 ↗
15. Rehan, M.S.B.M., Rousseau, J., Fontaine, S., Gong, X.J.: Experimental study of the influence of ply orientation on DCB mode-I delamination behavior by using multidirectional fully isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos. Struct. 161, 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.036 ↗
16. Tao, J., Sun, C.T.: Influence of ply orientation on delamination in composite laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 32, 1933–1947 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983980320210310.1177/002199839803202103 ↗
17. Ghasemnejad, H., Hadavinia, H., Aboutorabi, A.: Effect of delamination failure in crashworthiness analysis of hybrid composite box structures. Mater. Des. 31(3), 1105–1116 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.04310.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.043 ↗
18. Warrior, N.A., Turner, T.A., Robitaille, F., Rudd, C.D.: The effect of interlaminar toughening strategies on the energy absorption of composite tubes. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 35(4), 431–437 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.11.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2003.11.001 ↗
19. Rabiee, A., Ghasemnejad, H.: Effect of multi stitched locations on high speed crushing of composite tubular structures. Compos. B. Eng. 100, 164–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.068 ↗
20. Czaplicki, M.J., Robertson, R.E., Thornton, P.H.: Comparison of bevel and tulip triggered pultruded tubes for energy absorption. Compos. Sci. Technol. 40(1), 31–46 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(91)90041-M10.1016/0266-3538(91)90041-M ↗
21. Palanivelu, S., Van Paepegem, W., Degrieck, J., Van Ackeren, J., Kakogiannis, D., Van Hemelrijck, D., et al.: Experimental study on the axial crushing behaviour of pultruded composite tubes. Polym. Testing. 29(2), 224–234 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.11.005 ↗
22. Sivagurunathan, R., Lau Tze Way, S., Sivagurunathan, L., Yaakob, M.Y.: The Effects of Triggering Mechanisms on the Energy Absorption Capability of Circular Jute/Epoxy Composite Tubes under Quasi-Static Axial Loading. Appl. Compos. Mater. 25, 1401–1417 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9673-510.1007/s10443-018-9673-5 ↗
23. Tong, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Suman, B.: Energy absorption capability of carbon fiber reinforced plastic tubes with semi-circle grooved external trigger. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 35(20), 1460–1476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441665457910.1177/0731684416654579 ↗
24. Huang, J., Wang, X.: On a new crush trigger for energy absorption of composite tubes. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 15(6), 625–634 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2010.48419410.1080/13588265.2010.484194 ↗
25. Huang, J.C., Wang, X.W.: Effect of the SMA trigger on the energy absorption characteristics of CFRP circular tubes. J. Compos. Mater. 44(5), 639–651 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830934757210.1177/0021998309347572 ↗
26. Rabiee, A., Ghasemnejad, H.: Laminate Tailoring of Composite Tubular Structures to Improve Crashworthiness Design at Off-Axis Loading. Open. J. Compos. Mater. 08(03), 84–109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2018.8300810.4236/ojcm.2018.83008 ↗