Prediction of Equivalent Elastic Modulus for Metal-Coated Lattice Based on Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Mines, R.A.W., Tsopanos, S., Shen, Y., Hasan, R., McKown, S.T.: Drop weight impact behaviour of sandwich panels with metallic micro lattice cores. Int. J. Impact. Eng. 60, 120–132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.007 ↗
2. Xiao, R., Feng, X., Fan, R., Chen, S., Song, J., Gao, L.: 3d printing of titanium-coated gradient composite lattices for lightweight mandibular prosthesis. Compos. Part B Eng. 193, 108057 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10805710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108057 ↗
3. Abueidda, D., Elhebeary, M., Shiang, A., Jasiuk, I.: Compression and buckling of microarchitectured neovius-lattice. Extreme Mech. Lett. 37, 100688 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.10068810.1016/j.eml.2020.100688 ↗
4. Moongkhamklang, P., Wadley, H.N.G.: Titanium matrix composite lattice structures. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 39, 176–187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.007 ↗
5. Nasiri, S., Khosravani, M.R.: Machine learning in predicting mechanical behavior of additively manufactured parts. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 14, 1137–1153 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 ↗
6. Maskery, I., Aremu, A.O., Simonelli, M., Tuck, C., Wildman, R.D., Ashcroft, I.A., Hague, R.J.M.: Mechanical properties of ti-6al-4v selectively laser melted parts with body-centred-cubic lattices of varying cell size. Exp. Mech. 55(7), 1261–1272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0021-510.1007/s11340-015-0021-5 ↗
7. Gibson, L., Ashby, M.: Cellular solids: Structure and properties 9, (1988). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
8. Ashby, M.: The properties of foams and lattices. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 364, 15–30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
9. Păcurar, R., Păcurar, A., Anna, P., Balc, N.: Finite element analysis to predict the mechanical behavior of lattice structures made by selective laser melting technology. Appl. Mech. Mater. 657, 231–235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.657.23110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.657.231 ↗
10. Nguyen, D.S., Nguyen-Van, T.A.: A method to investigate mechanical properties of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 37, 305–318 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7736/JKSPE.019.10010.7736/JKSPE.019.100 ↗
11. Sereshk, M., Triplett, K., John, C., Martin, K., Gorin, S., Avery, A., Byer, E., Pierre, C., Soltani Tehrani, A., Shamsaei, N.: A computational and experimental investigation into mechanical characterizations of strut-based lattice structures. (2020)
12. Marco, M., Belda, R., Miguélez, M.H., Giner, E.: Numerical analysis of mechanical behaviour of lattice and porous structures. Compos. Struct. 261, 113292 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11329210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113292 ↗
13. Qian, X., Yang, R.: Machine learning for predicting thermal transport properties of solids. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 146, 100642 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2021.10064210.1016/j.mser.2021.100642 ↗
14. Song, J., Gao, L., Cao, K., Zhang, H., Xu, S., Jiang, C., Surjadi, J.U., Xu, Y., Lu, Y.: Metal-coated hybrid meso-lattice composites and their mechanical characterizations. Compos. Struct. 203, 750–763 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.07410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.074 ↗
15. Zheng, T., Li, S., Xu, Q., Hu, Y.: Core and panel types affect the mechanical properties and failure modes of the wood-based xx-type lattice sandwich structure. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 79, 1–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01635-510.1007/s00107-020-01635-5 ↗
16. Feng, L.-J., Wu, L.-Z., Yu, G.-C.: An hourglass truss lattice structure and its mechanical performances. Mater. Des. 99, 581–591 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.10010.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.100 ↗
17. Tancogne-Dejean, T., Spierings, A., Mohr, D.: Additively-manufactured metallic micro-lattice materials for high specific energy absorption under static and dynamic loading. Acta Mater. 116, 14–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.05410.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.054 ↗
18. Ibañez, R., Abisset-Chavanne, E., Aguado, J.V., Gonzalez, D., Cueto, E., Chinesta, F.: A manifold learning approach to data-driven computational elasticity and inelasticity. Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 25(1), 47–57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9197-910.1007/s11831-016-9197-9 ↗
19. Pilania, G., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Rajasekaran, S., Ramprasad, R.: Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 3(1), 2810 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0281010.1038/srep02810 ↗
20. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A., Wolverton, C.: A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2(1), 16028 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.2810.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
21. Li, Z., Liu, R., Wu, D.: Data-driven smart manufacturing: Tool wear monitoring with audio signals and machine learning. J. Manuf. Process. 48, 66–76 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.02010.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.020 ↗
22. Cheng, M.-Y., Kusoemo, D., Gosno, R.A.: Text mining-based construction site accident classification using hybrid supervised machine learning. Autom. Constr. 118, 103265 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10326510.1016/j.autcon.2020.103265 ↗
23. Shi, B., Bai, X., Yao, C.: An end-to-end trainable neural network for image-based sequence recognition and its application to scene text recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(11), 2298–2304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.264637110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2646371 ↗
24. Yang, K., Xu, X., Yang, B., Cook, B., Ramos, H., Krishnan, N.M.A., Smedskjaer, M., Hoover, C., Bauchy, M.: Predicting the young’s modulus of silicate glasses using high-throughput molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning. Sci. Rep. 9, 8739 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45344-310.1038/s41598-019-45344-3 ↗
25. Paturi, U.M.R., Cheruku, S.: Application and performance of machine learning techniques in manufacturing sector from the past two decades: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 38, 2392–2401 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.209. International Conference & Exposition on Mechanical, Material and Manufacturing Technology (ICE3MT)10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.209 ↗
26. Roy, A., Babuska, T., Krick, B., Balasubramanian, G.: Machine learned feature identification for predicting phase and young’s modulus of low-, medium- and high-entropy alloys. Scr. Mater. 185, 152–158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.04.01610.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.04.016 ↗
27. Chen, S., Yang, R., Zhong, M.: Graph-based semi-supervised random forest for rotating machinery gearbox fault diagnosis. Control. Eng. Pract. 117, 104952 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.10495210.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104952 ↗
28. Zhan, Z., Li, H.: A novel approach based on the elastoplastic fatigue damage and machine learning models for life prediction of aerospace alloy parts fabricated by additive manufacturing. Int. J. Fatigue 145, 106089 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10608910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106089 ↗
29. Zhang, M., Sun, C.-N., Zhang, X., Goh, P.C., Wei, J., Hardacre, D., Li, H.: High cycle fatigue life prediction of laser additive manufactured stainless steel: A machine learning approach. Int. J. Fatigue 128, 105194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10519410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105194 ↗
30. Herriott, C., Spear, A.D.: Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine- and deep-learning methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 175, 109599 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10959910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109599 ↗
31. Mashhadban, H., Kutanaei, S.S., Sayarinejad, M.A.: Prediction and modeling of mechanical properties in fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete using particle swarm optimization algorithm and artificial neural network. Constr. Build. Mater. 119, 277–287 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.03410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.034 ↗
32. Chehreh Chelgani, S., Matin, S.S., Makaremi, S.: Modeling of free swelling index based on variable importance measurements of parent coal properties by random forest method. Measurement 94, 416–422 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.07010.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.070 ↗
33. Matin, S.S., Farahzadi, L., Makaremi, S., Chelgani, S.C., Sattari, G.: Variable selection and prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity by random forest. Appl. Soft Comput. 70, 980–987 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.03010.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.030 ↗
34. Hossain, K.M.A., Anwar, M.S., Samani, S.G.: Regression and artificial neural network models for strength properties of engineered cementitious composites. Neural Comput. Applic. 29(9), 631–645 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2602-310.1007/s00521-016-2602-3 ↗
35. du Plessis, A., Yadroitsava, I., Yadroitsev, I.: Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A review focusing on x-ray tomography insights. Mater. Des. 187, 108385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10838510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108385 ↗
36. Rahman, A., Deshpande, P., Radue, M.S., Odegard, G.M., Gowtham, S., Ghosh, S., Spear, A.D.: A machine learning framework for predicting the shear strength of carbon nanotube-polymer interfaces based on molecular dynamics simulation data. Compos. Sci. Technol. 207, 108627 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10862710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108627 ↗
37. Bayliss, C.: Machine learning based simulation optimisation for urban routing problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 105, 107269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.10726910.1016/j.asoc.2021.107269 ↗
38. Soleimanian, S., Wang, X., Chen, M., Yu, Y., Li, J., Chen, G.: Multiscale evaluation of the elastic behavior for the metal-coated lattice structures (2020). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-88803/v110.21203/rs.3.rs-88803/v1 ↗
39. Wang, X., Yuan, F., Chen, M., He, J., Wang, P., Yu, Y., Li, J.: Investigation on mechanical characterizations of metal-coated lattice structure. Sustainable Buildings and Structures: Building a Sustainable Tomorrow, 1st edition edn., p. 7 (2019)10.1201/9781003000716-23 ↗
40. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088), 533–536 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
41. Friedman, J.: Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗