journal article·2024-06

Exploring Flexural Performances of Fused Filament Fabrication 3D-Printed ABS and ABS-Composites through Innovative Bio-Inspired Processing Parameter Optimization

Zhaogui Wang, Kexuan Zhou, Chengping Bi

Applied Composite Materials· Volume 31· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Boulaala, M., Elmessaoudi, D., Buj-Corral, I., et al.: Towards design of mechanical part and electronic control of multi-material/multicolor fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 110, 45–55 (2020)10.1007/s00170-020-05847-0 ↗
2. Ahmadifar, M., Benfriha, K., Shirinbayan, M., et al.: Additive manufacturing of polymer-based composites using fused filament fabrication (FFF): A review. Appl. Compos. Mater. 28, 1335–1380 (2021)10.1007/s10443-021-09933-8 ↗
3. Yilmaz, H., Turan, M.K.: FahamecV1: A Low Cost Automated Metaphase Detection System. Eng. Technol Appl. Sci. Res. 7(6), 2160–2166 (2017)10.48084/etasr.1464 ↗
4. Weng, Z., Wang, J., Senthil, T., et al.: Mechanical and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Mater. Des. 102, 276–283 (2016)10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045 ↗
5. De Mendonça, A.C., Cavalcanti, D.K.K., De Queiroz, H.F.: Mechanical characterization of Filler modified ABS 3D-printed composites made via Fused Filament Fabrication. Annals of Dunarea De Jos University of Galati. Fascicle XII. Weld. Equip. Technol. 33, 27–34 (2022)
6. Alomarah, A., Masood, S.H., Ruan, D.: Out-of-plane and in-plane compression of additively manufactured auxetic structures[J]. Aerosp Sci. Technol. 106,(2020)10.1016/j.ast.2020.106107 ↗
7. Alomarah, A., Masood, S.H., Ruan, D.: Dynamic and quasistatic properties of an auxetic structure: A comparative study[J]. Adv. Eng. Mater. 24(9),(2022)10.1002/adem.202101811 ↗
8. Kain, A., Mueller, C., Reinecke, H.: High aspect ratio-and 3D-printing of freestanding sophisticated structures. Procedia Chem. 1(1), 750–753 (2009)10.1016/j.proche.2009.07.187 ↗
9. Chu, J., Engelbrecht, S., Graf, G., et al.: A comparison of synthesis methods for cellular structures with application to additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp. J. 16(4), 275–283 (2010)10.1108/13552541011049298 ↗
10. Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H., Bhowmik, J.L.: Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv. Manuf. 3(1), 42–53 (2015)10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
11. Belarbi, B., Ghernaout, M.E.A., Benabdallah, T.: Implementation of a New Geometrical Qualification (DQ) Method for an Open Access Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printer. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 9(3), 4182–4187 (2019)10.48084/etasr.2689 ↗
12. Pati, K.N.V.: Effect of process parameters on the quality of Additively Manufactured PETG-Silk Composite. Appl. Compos. Mater. 30(1), 135–155 (2023)10.1007/s10443-022-10074-9 ↗
13. Mohamed, O.A., Masood, S.H., Bhowmik, J.L.: Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: A review of current research and future prospects. Adv. Manuf. 3, 42–53 (2015)10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
14. Li, H., Wang, T., Sun, J., et al.: The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyp. J. 24(1), 80–92 (2018)10.1108/RPJ-06-2016-0090 ↗
15. Tanveer, M.Q., Haleem, A., Suhaib, M.: Effect of variable infill density on mechanical behaviour of 3-D printed PLA specimen: An experimental investigation. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–12 (2019)10.1007/s42452-019-1744-1 ↗
16. Buj-Corral, I., Bagheri, A., Domínguez-Fernández, A., et al.: Influence of infill and nozzle diameter on porosity of FDM printed parts with rectilinear grid pattern. Procedia Manuf. 41, 288–295 (2019)10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.011 ↗
17. Ansari, A.A., Kamil, M.: Effect of print speed and extrusion temperature on properties of 3D-printed PLA using fused deposition modeling process. Mater. Today: Proc. 45, 5462–5468 (2021)
18. Mishra, P.K., Senthil, P., Adarsh, S., et al.: An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D-printed polylactic acid parts. Compos. Comm. 24, 100605 (2021)10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605 ↗
19. Yadav, P., Sahai, A., Sharma, R.S.: Strength and surface characteristics of FDM-based 3D-printed PLA parts for multiple infill design patterns. J. Institution Eng. (India): Ser. C 102, 197–207 (2021)10.1007/s40032-020-00625-z ↗
20. Özen, A., Abali, B.E., Völlmecke, C., et al.: Exploring the role of manufacturing parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties in fused deposition modeling (FDM) using PETG. Appl. Compos. Mater. 28(6), 1799–1828 (2021)10.1007/s10443-021-09940-9 ↗
21. Zisopol, D.G., Nae, I., Portoaca, A.I., et al.: A Statistical Approach of the Flexural Strength of PLA and ABS 3D-printed Parts. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 12(2), 8248–8252 (2022)10.48084/etasr.4739 ↗
22. Lizenboim, B., Kenig, S., Naveh, N.: The effect of nozzle geometry on the structure and Properties of 3D printed Carbon Polyamide composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. 1–17 (2023)10.1007/s10443-023-10166-0 ↗
23. Żur, P., Kołodziej, A., Baier, A., et al.: Optimization of abs 3D-printing method and parameters. Eur. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 3(1), 44–51 (2020)10.33422/ejest.v3i1.160 ↗
24. Mohan, D., Bakir, A.N., Sajab, M.S., et al.: Homogeneous distribution of lignin/graphene fillers with enhanced interlayer adhesion for 3D printing filament. Polym. Compos. 42(5), 2408–2421 (2021)10.1002/pc.25987 ↗
25. Tymrak, B.M., Kreiger, M., Pearce, J.M.: Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater. Des. 58, 242–246 (2014)10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
26. Lanzotti, A., Grasso, M., Staiano, G., et al.: The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyp. J. 21(5), 604–617 (2015)10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135 ↗
27. Fernandez-Vicente, M., Calle, W., Ferrandiz, S., et al.: Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Print Additive Manuf. 3(3), 183–192 (2016)10.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
28. Ahn, S.H., Montero, M., Odell, D., et al.: Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp. J. 8(4), 248–257 (2002)10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
29. Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., Ziemian, S.: Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mech. Eng. 23, 159–180 (2012)
30. Tsouknidas, A., Pantazopoulos, M., Katsoulis, I., et al.: Impact absorption capacity of 3D-printed components fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mater. Des. 102, 41–44 (2016)10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.154 ↗
31. Aloyaydi, B.A., Sivasankaran, S., A mmar H: R. Influence of infill density on microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D-printed PLA thermoplastic parts processed by fusion deposition modeling. AIMS Mater. Sci. 6(6) (2019)10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1033 ↗
32. Durgun, I., Ertan, R.: Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp. J. 20(3), 228–235 (2014)10.1108/RPJ-10-2012-0091 ↗
33. Sharma, D., Hiremath, S.S.: Compressive and flexural properties of the novel lightweight tailored bio-inspired structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 174, 109169 (2022)10.1016/j.tws.2022.109169 ↗
34. Siddique, S.H., Hazell, P.J., Wang, H., et al.: Lessons from nature: 3D printed bio-inspired porous structures for impact energy absorption–A review. Additive Manuf. 103051 (2022)10.1016/j.addma.2022.103051 ↗
35. Ramakrishna, D., Bala Murali, G.: Bio-inspired 3D-printed lattice structures for energy absorption applications: A review. Proc. Inst. Mechan. Eng. Part L: J. Mater. Des. Appl. 237(3), 503–542 (2023)
36. ASTM S:. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM D790. Annual book of ASTM standards (1997)
37. Yuan, Y., Yao, X., Liu, B., et al.: Failure modes and strength prediction of thin ply CFRP angle-ply laminates. Compos. Struct. 176, 729–735 (2017)10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.005 ↗
38. Yuan, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Q., et al.: Dependence of damage modes on the ply-thickness of ultra-thin-ply composites. Compos. Part C: Open Access 4, 100105 (2021)
39. Yuan, Y., Zhang, X., Li, X., et al.: Manipulating impact damage modes in composite laminates by helical pitch angle and ply thickness. Eng. Fract. Mech. 265 (2022)10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108383 ↗
40. Li, X., Zhang, X., Yuan, Y., et al.: Damage tolerance mechanism of bioinspired hybridization helical composite in lobster homarus americanus. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufac. 157 (2022)10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106936 ↗
41. Yin, S., Yang, R., Huang, Y., et al.: Toughening mechanism of coelacanth-fish-inspired double-helicoidal composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 205 (2021)10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108650 ↗
42. Liu, J.L., Lee, H.P., Tan, V.B.C.: Effects of inter-ply angles on the failure mechanisms in bioinspired helicoidal laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 165, 282–289 (2018)10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.017 ↗
43. Ginzburg, D., Pinto, F., Iervolino, O., et al.: Damage tolerance of bio-inspired helicoidal composites under low velocity impact. Compos. Struct. 161, 187–203 (2017)10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.097 ↗
44. Liu, J.L., Lee, H.P., Tan, V.B.C.: Failure mechanisms in bioinspired helicoidal laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 157, 99–106 (2018)10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.033 ↗
45. Zhang, B., Han, Q., Qin, H., et al.: Bending resistance and anisotropy of basalt fibers laminate composite with bionic helical structure. J. Bionic. Eng. 19(3), 799–815 (2022)10.1007/s42235-022-00155-7 ↗
46. Liu, J.L., Lim, E.W.L., Sun, Z.P., et al.: Improving strength and impact resistance of 3D-printed components with helicoidal printing direction. Int. J. Impact Eng. 169 (2022)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104320 ↗
47. An, L., Wu, X., Wang, K., et al.: Crack modes and toughening strategies of bioinspired 3D-printed double-helicoidal architectures. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 253 (2023)10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108388 ↗
48. Li, W., Huang, W., Xiong, Y., et al.: Failure mechanism and heat treatment effect of 3D-printed bio-inspired helicoidal CF/PEEK composites. Compos. Commun. 37 (2023)10.1016/j.coco.2022.101464 ↗
49. Fabritius, H.O., Sachs, C., Triguero, P.R., et al.: Influence of structural principles on the mechanics of a biological fiber-based composite material with hierarchical organization: The exoskeleton of the lobster Homarus americanus. Adv. Mater. 21(4), 391–400 (2009)10.1002/adma.200801219 ↗
50. Verma, P., Ubaid, J., Schiffer, A., et al.: Essential work of fracture assessment of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) processed via fused filament fabrication additive manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 113, 771–784 (2021)10.1007/s00170-020-06580-4 ↗
51. Jiang, H., Ren, Y., Liu, Z., et al.: Low-velocity impact resistance behaviors of bio-inspired helicoidal composite laminates with non-linear rotation angle based layups. Compos. Struct. 214, 463–475 (2019)10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.034 ↗
52. Baikerikar, P., Turner, C.J.: Comparison of FEA simulations and experimental results for as-built additively manufactured dogbone specimens. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 115(9–10), 2839–2851 (2021)10.1007/s00170-021-07307-9 ↗
53. ABAQUS: Version 6.14 User’s Manual. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, Providence, RI, USA (2014)
54. Zhang, X., Yuan, Y.: Mechanical behavior of bio-inspired crossed-lamellar microstructures for achieving high-performance composites. Eng. Fract. Mech. 289 (2023)10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109397 ↗
55. Wang, Z., Smith, D.E.: Finite element modelling of fully-coupled flow/fiber-orientation effects in polymer composite deposition additive manufacturing nozzle-extrudate flow. Compos. Part B Eng. 219 (2021)10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108811 ↗
56. Wang, Z., Smith, D.E.: A fully coupled simulation of planar deposition flow and fiber orientation in polymer composites additive manufacturing. Materials 14(10), 2596 (2021)10.3390/ma14102596 ↗