Predictive Model for Creep Behavior of Composite Materials Using Gene Expression Programming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Smart Materials for Construction · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Demircan, G., Kisa, M., Ozen, M., Aktas, B.: Surface-modified alumina nanoparticles-filled aramid fiber-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites: preparation and mechanical properties. Iran. Polym. J. 29, 253–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-020-00790-z10.1007/s13726-020-00790-z ↗
2. Demircan, G., Kisa, M., Ozen, M., Acikgoz, A.: Quasi-static penetration behavior of glass-fiber-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Mech. Compos. Mater. 57(4), 503–516 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-021-09973-y10.1007/s11029-021-09973-y ↗
3. Ozen, M., Demircan, G., Kisa, M., Acikgoz, A., Ceyhan, G., Isıker, Y.: Thermal properties of surface-modified nano-Al2O3/Kevlar fiber/ epoxy composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 278, 125689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12568910.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125689 ↗
4. Berardi, V.P., Perrella, M., Feo, L., Cricrì, G.: Creep behavior of GFRP laminates and their phases: experimental investigation and analytical modeling. Compos. Part B-Eng. 122, 136–144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.015 ↗
5. Jia, Y., Peng, K., Gong, X., Zhang, Z.: Creep and recovery of polypropylene/carbon nanotube composites. Int. J. Plasticity. 27(8), 1239–1251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.02.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2011.02.004 ↗
6. Rafiee, R., Mazhari, B.: Simulation of the long-term hydrostatic tests on glass fiber reinforced plastic pipes. Compos. Struct. 136, 56–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.05810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.058 ↗
7. Katouzian, M., Vlase, S., Scutaru, M.L.: Finite element method-based simulation creep behavior of viscoelastic carbon-fiber composite. Polymers 13(7), 1017 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1307101710.3390/polym13071017 ↗
8. Asyraf, M.R.M., Ishak, M.R., Sapuan, S.M., Yidris, N.: Comparison of static and long-term creep behaviors between balau wood and glass fiber reinforced polymer composite for cross-arm application. Fiber. Polym. 22(3), 793–803 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0512-110.1007/s12221-021-0512-1 ↗
9. Asyraf, M.R.M., Ishak, M.R., Sapuan, S.M., Yidris, N.: Utilization of bracing arms as additional reinforcement in pultruded glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite cross-arms: creep experimental and numerical analyses. Polymers 13(4), 620 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1304062010.3390/polym13040620 ↗
10. Harries, K.A., Guo, Q., Cardoso, D.: Creep and creep buckling of pultruded glass-reinforced polymer members. Compos. Struct. 181, 315–324 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.09810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.098 ↗
11. Ghosh, S.K., Rajesh, P., Srikavya, B., Rathore, D.K., Prusty, R.K., Ray, B.C.: Creep behavior prediction of multi-layer graphene embedded glass fiber/epoxy composites using time-temperature superposition principle. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 107, 507–518 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.030 ↗
12. Yang, Z., Wang, H., Ma, X., Shang, F., Ma, Y., Shao, Z., Hou, D.: Flexural creep tests and long-term mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite tubes. Compos. Struct. 193, 154–164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.083 ↗
13. Yu, L., Ma, Y.: Loading rate and temperature dependence of flexural behavior in injection-molded glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos. Part B-Eng. 161, 285–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.035 ↗
14. Alwis, K.G.N.C., Burgoyne, C.J.: Time-Temperature superposition to determine the stress-rupture of aramid fibres. Appl. Compos. Mater. 13(4), 249–264 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-006-9017-810.1007/s10443-006-9017-8 ↗
15. Li, K., Yan, S.L., Pan, W.F., Zhao, G.: Warpage optimization of fiber-reinforced composite injection molding by combining back propagation neural network and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90, 963–970 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9409-310.1007/s00170-016-9409-3 ↗
16. Bautu, E., Bautu, A., Luchian, H.: Symbolic regression on noisy data with genetic and gene expression programming. International Symposium on Symbolic & Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing. IEEE Computer Society. 321–324 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/SYNASC.2005.7010.1109/SYNASC.2005.70 ↗
17. Zhang, H.R., Hao, J., Lv, Y.G., Zhao, L.: Symbolic regression on noisy data with stepwise genetic programming algorithm. Appl. Mech. Mater. 530(531), 625–628 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.530-531.62510.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.530-531.625 ↗
18. Yuan, C., Tang, C., Wen, Y., Zuo, J., Peng, J., Hu, J.: Convergency of genetic regression in data mining based on gene expression programming and optimized solution. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 28(4), 359–366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2006.1144182210.1080/1206212X.2006.11441822 ↗
19. Kalfat, R., Nazari, A., Al-Mahaidi, R., Sanjayan, J.: Genetic programming in the simulation of FRP-to-concrete patch-anchored joints. Compos. Struct. 138, 305–312 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.005 ↗
20. Ebid, A.M., Deifalla, A.: Prediction of shear strength of FRP reinforced beams with and without stirrups using GP technique. Ain. Shams. Eng. J. 12(3), 2493–2510 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.00610.1016/j.asej.2021.02.006 ↗
21. Murad, Y., Tarawneh, B., Ashteyat, A.: Prediction model for concrete carbonation depth using gene expression programming. Comput. Concrete. 26(6), 497–504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.26.6.49710.12989/cac.2020.26.6.497 ↗
22. Murad, Y., Ashteyat, A., Hunaifat, R.: Predictive model to the bond strength of FRP-to concrete under direct pullout using gene expression programming. J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 25(8), 773–784 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.1079810.3846/jcem.2019.10798 ↗
23. Iqbal, M., Zhao, Q., Zhang, D., Jalal, F.E., Jamal, A.: Evaluation of tensile strength degradation of GFRP rebars in harsh alkaline conditions using non-linear genetic-based models. Mater. Struct. 54(5), 190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01783-x10.1617/s11527-021-01783-x ↗
24. Murad, Y., Tarawneh, A., Arar, F., Al-Zu’bi, A., Al-Ghwairi, A., Al-Jaafreh, A., Tarawneh, M.: Flexural strength prediction for concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars using gene expression programming. Struct. 33, 3163–3172 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.04510.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.045 ↗
25. Güneyisi, E.M., Nour, A.I.: Axial compression capacity of circular CFST columns transversely strengthened by FRP. Eng. Struct. 191, 417–431 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.05610.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.056 ↗
26. Murad, Y., Hunifat, R., AL-Bodour, W.: Interior reinforced concrete beam-to-column joints subjected to cyclic loading: shear strength prediction using gene expression programming. Case. Stud. Constr. Mat. 13, e00432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e0043210.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00432 ↗
27. Murad, Y.: Predictive model for bidirectional shear strength of reinforced concrete columns subjected to biaxial cyclic loading. Eng. Struct. 244, 112781 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11278110.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112781 ↗
28. Murad, Y.: Joint shear strength models for exterior RC beam-column connections exposed to biaxial and uniaxial cyclic loading. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10122510.1016/j.jobe.2020.101225 ↗
29. Mansouri, I., Güneyisi, E.M., Mosalam, K.M.: Improved shear strength model for exterior reinforced concrete beam-column joints using gene expression programming. Eng. Struct. 228, 111563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11156310.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111563 ↗
30. Hassani, M., Safi, M., Ardakani, R.R., Daryan, A.S.: Predicting fire resistance of SRC columns through gene expression programming. J. Struct. Fire. Eng. 12(2), 125–140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-04-2020-001310.1108/JSFE-04-2020-0013 ↗
31. Beheshti Aval, S.B., Ketabdari, H., Asil Gharebaghi, S.: Estimating shear strength of short rectangular reinforced concrete columns using nonlinear regression and gene expression programming. Struct. 12, 13–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.07.00210.1016/j.istruc.2017.07.002 ↗
32. Tarawneh, A., Almasabha, G., Alawadi, R., Tarawneh, M.: Innovative and reliable model for shear strength of steel fibers reinforced concrete beams. Struct. 32, 1015–1025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.08110.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.081 ↗
33. Iqbal, M.F., Liu, Q.F., Azim, I., Zhu, X., Yang, J., Javed, M.F., Rauf, M.: Prediction of mechanical properties of green concrete incorporating waste foundry sand based on gene expression programming. J. Hazard. Mater. 384, 121322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12132210.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121322 ↗
34. Jafari, S., Mahini, S.S.: Lightweight concrete design using gene expression programing. Constr. Build. Mater. 139, 93–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.12010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.120 ↗
35. Gholampour, A., Gandomi, A.H., Ozbakkaloglu, T.: New formulations for mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete using gene expression programming. Constr. Build. Mater. 130, 122–145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.11410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.114 ↗
36. Bouziadi, F., Boulekbache, B., Haddi, A., Hamrat, M., Djelal, C.: Finite element modeling of creep behavior of FRP-externally strengthened reinforced concrete beams. Eng. Struct. 204, 109908 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10990810.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109908 ↗
37. Anand, A., Banerjee, P., Sahoo, D., Rathore, D.K., Prusty, R.K., Ray, B.C.: Effects of temperature and load on the creep performance of CNT reinforced laminated glass fiber/epoxy composites. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 150, 539–547 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.04810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.048 ↗
38. Berardi, V.P., Perrella, M., Armentani, E., Cricrì, G.: Experimental investigation and numerical modeling of creep response of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites. Fatigue. Fract. Eng. M. 44(4), 1085–1095 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1341510.1111/ffe.13415 ↗
39. Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Stat. Comput. 4(2), 87–112 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0017535510.1007/BF00175355 ↗
40. Ferreira, C.: Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex. Syst. 13(2), 87–129 (2001). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/010202710.48550/arXiv.cs/0102027 ↗
41. Zhong, J.H., Ong, Y.S., Cai, W.T.: Self-learning gene expression programming. Ieee. T. Evolut. Comput. 20(1), 65–80 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2015.242441010.1109/TEVC.2015.2424410 ↗
42. Gao, Y.F., Yin, D.S.: A full-stage creep model for rocks based on the variable-order fractional calculus. Appl. Math. Model. 95(1), 435–446 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.02010.1016/j.apm.2021.02.020 ↗
43. Milad, A., Hussein, S.H., Khekan, A.R., Rashid, M., Al-Msari, H., Tran, T.H.: Development of ensemble machine learning approaches for designing fiber-reinforced polymer composite strain prediction model. Eng. Comput. 38, 3625–3637 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01398-410.1007/s00366-021-01398-4 ↗
44. Sokairge, H., Elgabbas, F., Rashad, A., Elshafie, H.: Long-term creep behavior of basalt fiber reinforced polymer bars. Constr. Build. Mater. 260, 120437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12043710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120437 ↗
45. Liang, N., Zhu, S.R., Chen, J.Z., Fang, X.: Long-term behavior of GFRP pipes: optimizing the distribution of failure points during testing. Polym. Test. 48, 7–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.08.01110.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.08.011 ↗
46. Benmokrane, B., Brown, Vicki L., Mohamed, K., Nanni, A., Rossini, M., Shield, C.: Creep-rupture limit for GFRP bars subjected to sustained loads. J. Compos. Constr. 23(6), 06019001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000097110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000971 ↗
47. Farooq, M., Banthia, N.: FRP fibre-cementitious matrix interfacial bond under time-dependent loading. Mater. Struct. 52, 109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1409-y10.1617/s11527-019-1409-y ↗
48. Li, M., Zhang, H., Li, S., Zhu, W., Ke, Y.: Machine learning and materials informatics approaches for predicting transverse mechanical properties of unidirectional CFRP composites with microvoids. Mater. Design. 224, 111340 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11134010.1016/j.matdes.2022.111340 ↗