Mechanical Properties and Dynamic Constitutive Model of Polyurethane Foam under Different Strain Rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Nasirzadeh, R., Sabet, A.R.: Study of foam density variations in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading. Int. J. Impact Eng 63, 129–139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.009 ↗
2. Yang, P., Shams, S.S., Slay, A., Brokate, B., Elhajjar, R.: Evaluation of temperature effects on low velocity impact damage in composite sandwich panels with polymeric foam cores. Compos. Struct. 129, 213–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.06510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.065 ↗
3. Reyes, A., Børvik, T.: Low velocity impact on crash components with steel skins and polymer foam cores. Int. J. Impact Eng 132, 103297 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.011 ↗
4. Bienvenu, Y.: Application and future of solid foams. C R Phys. 15(8–9), 719–730 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2014.09.00610.1016/j.crhy.2014.09.006 ↗
5. Gama, N.V., Ferreira, A., Barros-Timmons, A.: Polyurethane foams: Past, present, and future. Materials 11(10), 1841 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1110184110.3390/ma11101841 ↗
6. Thirumal, M., Khastgir, D., Singha, N.K., Manjunath, B.S., Naik, Y.P.: Effect of foam density on the properties of water blown rigid polyurethane foam. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 108(3), 1810–1817 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2771210.1002/app.27712 ↗
7. Saint-Michel, F., Chazeau, L., Cavaillé, J.Y., Chabert, E.: Mechanical properties of high density polyurethane foams: I. Effect of the density. Compos. Sci. Technol. 66(15), 2700–2708 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.009 ↗
8. Saint-Michel, F., Chazeau, L., Cavaillé, J.Y.: Mechanical properties of high density polyurethane foams: II Effect of the filler size. Compos. Sci. Technol. 66(15), 2709–2718 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.008 ↗
9. Gibson, L.J.: Cellular solids. Mrs Bull. 28(4), 270–274 (2003)10.1557/mrs2003.79 ↗
10. Hwang, B.K., Kim, S.K., Kim, J.H., Kim, J.D., Lee, J.M.: Dynamic compressive behavior of rigid polyurethane foam with various densities under different temperatures. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 180, 105657 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10565710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105657 ↗
11. Ramirez, B.J., Gupta, V.: High tear strength polyurea foams with low compression set and shrinkage properties at elevated temperatures. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 150, 29–34 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.01410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.014 ↗
12. Linul, E., Marsavina, L., Voiconi, T., Sadowski, T.: Study of factors influencing the mechanical properties of polyurethane foams under dynamic compression. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 451(1), p. 012002. IOP Publishing. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/451/1/01200210.1088/1742-6596/451/1/012002 ↗
13. Linul, E., Şerban, D.A., Marsavina, L., Sadowski, T.: Assessment of collapse diagrams of rigid polyurethane foams under dynamic loading conditions. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 17, 457–466 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2016.12.00910.1016/j.acme.2016.12.009 ↗
14. Linul, E., Marşavina, L., Vălean, C., Bănică, R.: Static and dynamic mode I fracture toughness of rigid PUR foams under room and cryogenic temperatures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 225, 106274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.007 ↗
15. Sun, Y., Li, Q.M.: Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling. Int. J. Impact Eng 112, 74–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.006 ↗
16. Chen, W., Lu, F., Winfree, N.: High-strain-rate compressive behavior of a rigid polyurethane foam with various densities. Exp. Mech. 42, 65–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0241105310.1007/BF02411053 ↗
17. Luong, D.D., Pinisetty, D., Gupta, N.: Compressive properties of closed-cell polyvinyl chloride foams at low and high strain rates: Experimental investigation and critical review of state of the art. Compos. B: Eng. 44(1), 403–416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.060 ↗
18. Othman, R.: On the use of complex Young’s modulus while processing polymeric Kolsky-Hopkinson bars’ experiments. Int. J. Impact Eng 73, 123–134 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.06.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.06.009 ↗
19. Koumlis, S., Lamberson, L.: Strain rate dependent compressive response of open cell polyurethane foam. Exp. Mech. 59, 1087–1103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00521-310.1007/s11340-019-00521-3 ↗
20. Daniel, I.M., Cho, J.M., Werner, B.T.: Characterization and modeling of stain-rate-dependent behavior of polymeric foams. Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 45, 70–78 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.003 ↗
21. Sanborn, B., Song, B.: Energy dissipation characteristics in pre-strained silicone foam transitioning to silicone rubber. J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 5, 51–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-019-00183-110.1007/s40870-019-00183-1 ↗
22. Xiao, Y., Yin, J., Zhang, X., An, X., Xiong, Y., Sun, Y.: Mechanical performance and cushioning energy absorption characteristics of rigid polyurethane foam at low and high strain rates. Polym. Testing 109, 107531 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10753110.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107531 ↗
23. Bryson, A., Smith, L.: Impact response of sports materials. Procedia Eng. 2(2), 2961–2966 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.09510.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.095 ↗
24. Rusch, K.C.: Load–compression behavior of flexible foams. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13(11), 2297–2311 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.0701311010.1002/app.1969.07013110 ↗
25. Hanssen, A.G., Hopperstad, O.S., Langseth, M., Ilstad, H.: Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 44(2), 359–406 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-110.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-1 ↗
26. Liu, Q., Subhash, G.: A phenomenological constitutive model for foams under large deformations. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44(3), 463–473 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2004110.1002/pen.20041 ↗
27. Avalle, M., Belingardi, G., Ibba, A.: Mechanical models of cellular solids: Parameters identification from experimental tests. Int. J. Impact Eng 34(1), 3–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.01210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.012 ↗
28. Reid, S.R., Peng, C.: Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood. Int. J. Impact Eng 19(5–6), 531–570 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
29. Zheng, Z., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Reid, S.R.: Dynamic crushing of cellular materials: Continuum-based wave models for the transitional and shock modes. Int. J. Impact Eng 42, 66–79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.09.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.09.009 ↗
30. Lopatnikov, S.L., Gama, B.A., Haque, M.J., Krauthauser, C., Gillespie, J.W., Jr., Guden, M., Hall, I.W.: Dynamics of metal foam deformation during Taylor cylinder–Hopkinson bar impact experiment. Compos. Struct. 61(1–2), 61–71 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00039-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00039-4 ↗
31. Lopatnikov, S.L., Gama, B.A., Haque, M.J., Krauthauser, C., Gillespie, J.W., Jr.: High-velocity plate impact of metal foams. Int. J. Impact Eng 30(4), 421–445 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00066-610.1016/S0734-743X(03)00066-6 ↗
32. Astm, D.: 1621, Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties Of Rigid Cellular Plastics. American Society for Testing and Materials, New York (2010)
33. Miltz, J., Gruenbaum, G.: Evaluation of cushioning properties of plastic foams from compressive measurements. Polym. Eng. Sci. 21(15), 1010–1014 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76021150510.1002/pen.760211505 ↗
34. Fan, J.T., Weerheijm, J., Sluys, L.J.: High-strain-rate tensile mechanical response of a polyurethane elastomeric material. Polymer 65, 72–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.04610.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.046 ↗
35. Li, Q.M., Meng, H.: Attenuation or enhancement—a one-dimensional analysis on shock transmission in the solid phase of a cellular material. Int. J. Impact Eng 27(10), 1049–1065 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00016-710.1016/S0734-743X(02)00016-7 ↗
36. Aldoshan, A., Khanna, S.: Effect of relative density on the dynamic compressive behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 689, 17–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.10010.1016/j.msea.2017.01.100 ↗
37. Peroni, M., Solomos, G., Pizzinato, V.: Impact behaviour testing of aluminium foam. Int. J. Impact Eng 53, 74–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.07.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.07.002 ↗
38. Sherwood, J.A., Frost, C.C.: Constitutive modeling and simulation of energy absorbing polyurethane foam under impact loading. Polym. Eng. Sci. 32(16), 1138–1146 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76032161110.1002/pen.760321611 ↗