Finite Element Analysis of Low-Speed Oblique Impact Behavior of Adhesively Bonded Composite Single-Lap Joints
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of a realistic numerical model that predicts the impact behavior of adhesively bonded composite joints is important for many industrial sectors such as automotive, aerospace, and marine. In this study, it was aimed to develop a numerical model that can predict the low-velocity oblique impact behavior of composite single-lap joints close to the experimental results. The validation of the proposed numerical model was carried out with the results of the previously experimentally tested joints. In explicit finite element analysis, the orthotropic material model and Hashin’s damage criterion were used in the numerical model of composite adherends. The adhesive region was divided into three different regions. The cohesive zone model (CZM) was used to determine the damage initiation and propagation in the upper and lower interface regions of adhesive. The middle region of the adhesive between the two cohesive interfaces was modeled with an elastic–plastic material model to reflect the plastic material behavior of the adhesive in the analysis. The effects of impact angle, fiber orientation, and overlap length on adhesive damage initiation and propagation were investigated in detail. There is a good agreement between the numerical and experimental results, considering the contact force-time variations and composite and adhesive damage. The impact angle and fiber angle had a significant effect on the impact behavior of the composite joints and the adhesive damage initiation and propagation. The increase in impact angle and fiber angle caused a decrease in the maximum contact force value. Adhesive damage propagation patterns varied according to the composite fiber orientation. In addition, since the shear toughness of the adhesive is higher than its tensile toughness, the amount of adhesive damage and damage propagation rate decreased as the impact angle increased.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Da Silva, L.F., Dillard, D.A., Blackman, B., Adams, R.D.: Testing adhesive joints: best practices. John Wiley & Sons (2012)10.1002/9783527647026 ↗
2. da Silva, L.F.M., Pirondi, A., Öchsner, A.: Hybrid adhesive joints, p. 309. Springer Science & Business Media Berlin Heidelberg (2011)10.1007/978-3-642-16623-5 ↗
3. Adams, R.D., Comyn, J., Wake, W.C.: Structural adhesive joints in engineering, p. 359. Chapman & Hall London (1997)
4. Da Silva, L.F., Öchsner, A., Adams, R.D.: Handbook of adhesion technology, p. 1554. Springer Science & Business Media Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2011)10.1007/978-3-642-01169-6 ↗
5. Machado, J.J.M., Marques, E.A.S., da Silva, L.F.M.: Adhesives and adhesive joints under impact loadings: An overview. J. Adhes. 94(6), 421–452 (2018)10.1080/00218464.2017.1282349 ↗
6. Chen, C., Sun, C., Han, X., Hu, D., Zhou, J., Guan, Z.: The structural response of the thermoplastic composite joint subjected to out-of-plane loading. Int. J. Impact Eng 145, 103691 (2020)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103691 ↗
7. He, B., Pan, Y.: Failure mechanism of single lap, adhesively bonded composite-titanium joints subjected to solid projectile impact. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 36(4), 370–391 (2022)10.1080/01694243.2021.1922213 ↗
8. Anderson, T.L.: Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC press (2017)10.1201/9781315370293 ↗
9. Hazimeh, R., Challita, G., Khalil, K., Othman, R.: Finite element analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints subjected to impact loadings. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 56, 24–31 (2015)10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.012 ↗
10. Machado, J., Gamarra, P.-R., Marques, E., da Silva, L.F.: Numerical study of the behaviour of composite mixed adhesive joints under impact strength for the automotive industry. Compos. Struct. 185, 373–380 (2018)10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.045 ↗
11. Morgado, M., Carbas, R., Dos Santos, D., Da Silva, L.: Strength of cfrp joints reinforced with adhesive layers. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 97, 102475 (2020)10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102475 ↗
12. Machado, J., Nunes, P., Marques, E., da Silva, L.F.: Numerical study of similar and dissimilar single lap joints under quasi-static and impact conditions. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 96, 102501 (2020)10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102501 ↗
13. Peres, L., Arnaud, M., Silva, A., Campilho, R., Machado, J., Marques, E., dos Reis, M., Da Silva, L.: Geometry and adhesive optimization of single-lap adhesive joints under impact. J. Adhes. 98(6), 677–703 (2022)10.1080/00218464.2021.1994404 ↗
14. Araújo, H., Machado, J., Marques, E., Da Silva, L.: Dynamic behaviour of composite adhesive joints for the automotive industry. Compos. Struct. 171, 549–561 (2017)10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.071 ↗
15. Hu, C., Huang, G., Li, C.: Experimental and numerical study of low-velocity impact and tensile after impact for CFRP laminates single-lap joints adhesively bonded structure. Materials 14(4), 1016 (2021)10.3390/ma14041016 ↗
16. Huang, W., Sun, L., Li, L., Shen, L., Huang, B., Zhang, Y.: Investigations on low-energy impact and post-impact fatigue of adhesively bonded single-lap joints using composites substrates. J. Adhes. 96(15), 1326–1354 (2020)10.1080/00218464.2019.1602767 ↗
17. Liu, B., Yan, R.: Damage mechanism and residual strength at different impact locations for composite bonding scarf repairs. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 32(23), 2523–2536 (2018)10.1080/01694243.2018.1492282 ↗
18. Erbayrak, E.: Investigations of low-velocity impact behaviour of single-lap joints having dissimilar hybrid composite adherends through cohesive zone model approach. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 36(5), 545–565 (2022)10.1080/01694243.2021.1970373 ↗
19. Boling, H., Dongyun, G.: Dynamic analysis of single-lap, adhesively bonded composite-titanium joints subjected to solid projectile impact. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 32(11), 1176–1199 (2018)10.1080/01694243.2017.1404667 ↗
20. Atahan, M.G., Apalak, M.K.: Low-speed bending impact behavior of adhesively bonded single-lap joints. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 31(14), 1545–1575 (2017)10.1080/01694243.2016.1264105 ↗
21. Atahan, M.G., Apalak, M.K.: Low-speed bending impact behaviour of adhesively bonded dissimilar single-lap joints. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 36(16), 1794–1822 (2022)10.1080/01694243.2021.1987720 ↗
22. Atahan, M.G., Apalak, M.K.: Experimental investigation of oblique impact behavior of adhesively bonded composite single-lap joints. Appl. Compos. Mater. 29(3), 1293–1319 (2022)10.1007/s10443-022-10018-3 ↗
23. Zhang, C., Huang, J., Li, X., Zhang, C.: Numerical study of the damage behavior of carbon fiber/glass fiber hybrid composite laminates under low-velocity impact. Fibers Polym. 21, 2873–2887 (2020)10.1007/s12221-020-0026-2 ↗
24. Zhang, T., Yan, Y., Li, J.: Experiments and numerical simulations of low-velocity impact of sandwich composite panels. Polym. Compos. 38(4), 646–656 (2017)10.1002/pc.23623 ↗
25. Araldite 2015 epoxy adhesive, Huntsman Advanced Materials. http://www.huntsman.com. Accessed 4 Apr 2023
26. Yildirim, M., Apalak, M.K.: Transverse low-speed impact behavior of adhesively bonded similar and dissimilar clamped plates. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 25(1–3), 69–91 (2011)10.1163/016942410X501106 ↗
27. ABAQUS, Analysis user’s guide documentation version 6.13, Dassault Systems SIMULIA Corp (2013)
28. Matzenmiller, A., Lubliner, J., Taylor, R.: A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech. Mater. 20, 125–152 (1995)10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
29. Hashin, Z., Rotem, A.: A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. J. Compos. Mater. 7(4), 448–464 (1973)10.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
30. Hashin, Z.: Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J. Appl. Mech. 47, 329–334 (1980)10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
31. Camanho, P.P., Dávila, C.G.: Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials, pp. 1–37. NASA/TM-2002-211737 (2002)
32. Campilho, R.D., Banea, M.D., Neto, J., da Silva, L.F.: Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 44, 48–56 (2013)10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
33. Moreira, R.D., de Moura, M.F., Silva, F.G., Rodrigues, J.S., Silva, F.D.: Fracture characterization of a bi-material bonded aluminum/CFRP joints under mixed-mode i+ ii loading. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 45(8), 2215–2226 (2022)10.1111/ffe.13730 ↗
34. Wong, K.J.: Moisture absorption characteristics and effects on mechanical behaviour of carbon/epoxy composite: application to bonded patch repairs of composite structures. PhD thesis, Dijon (2013)
35. Kaddour, A., Hinton, M.J., Smith, P.A., Li, S.: Mechanical properties and details of composite laminates for the test cases used in the third world-wide failure exercise. J. Compos. Mater. 47(20–21), 2427–2442 (2013)10.1177/0021998313499477 ↗
36. Aktaş, M., Karakuzu, R.: Determination of mechanical properties of glass-epoxy composites in high temperatures. Polym. Compos. 30(10), 1437–1441 (2009)10.1002/pc.20708 ↗
37. Icten, B.M., Atas, C., Aktas, M., Karakuzu, R.: Low temperature effect on impact response of quasi-isotropic glass/epoxy laminated plates. Compos. Struct. 91(3), 318–323 (2009)10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.010 ↗
38. Lapczyk, I., Hurtado, J.A.: Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38(11), 2333–2341 (2007)10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗