Compatibilization of coir fiber and elastomeric polyurethane by green modification routes
Source abstract
Abstract
Tuning the chemical functionality of lignocellulosic fiber plays a key role in the development of mechanically strong composites to overcome the lack of compatibility between composite phases, which is a major challenge in multidimensional applications of eco-composites. Herein, coir fiber (CF) surfaces were enriched through four kinds of modification routes – namely, mercerization, amino-functional silane treatment, bio-based epoxy resin sizing and isocyanate treatment – to enhance their interfacial adhesion to a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) matrix. The tensile strength and Shore hardness parameters of composites were improved by surface-modified CF inclusions. The thermomechanical response of TPU was optimized after CF loadings regardless of treatment type. The composite with silane-modified CF exhibited the lowest water uptake due to the hydrophobic behavior of the silane layer. The increase in interfacial interaction between the TPU matrix and modified CF was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy investigations. The chemically enriched surface of CF improves the performance of composites, thanks to improved adhesion in the TPU–CF interface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Basic Sciences, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye
Performance Materials, BASF Türk, Istanbul, Türkiye
Directorate of Directives, Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, Türkiye
Department of Textile Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-510.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.02610.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.026 ↗
4. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0022610.3389/fmats.2019.00226 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-319-07944-810.1007/978-3-319-07944-8 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10570-013-0007-310.1007/s10570-013-0007-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-9 ↗
8. 10.1002/mame.20140008910.1002/mame.201400089 ↗
9. 10.1155/2015/24394710.1155/2015/243947 ↗
10. Mary SK · Reviews of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2020 · 6 · 531
11. 10.1007/978-3-319-71410-310.1007/978-3-319-71410-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e0046710.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00467 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-011-6025-310.1007/s10853-011-6025-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053 ↗
16. 10.1080/15583724.2014.97112410.1080/15583724.2014.971124 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.13610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.136 ↗
19. 10.1002/mame.20130000810.1002/mame.201300008 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.222910.1002/app.2229 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-981-15-9643-8_1210.1007/978-981-15-9643-8_12 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10570-021-04086-010.1007/s10570-021-04086-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.04.00310.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.04.003 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.1988.07035030210.1002/app.1988.070350302 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.007 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10570-020-03221-710.1007/s10570-020-03221-7 ↗
28. 10.1177/089270571986461810.1177/0892705719864618 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10570-021-04361-010.1007/s10570-021-04361-0 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10570-006-9092-x10.1007/s10570-006-9092-x ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2014.88010310.1080/15440478.2014.880103 ↗
32. Verma D · Journal of Materials and Environmental Science · 2013 · 4 · 263
33. 10.21741/9781644901854-510.21741/9781644901854-5 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2352910.1002/pc.23529 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107305 ↗
36. 10.1039/D1RA00231G10.1039/D1RA00231G ↗
37. 10.1142/S175882511750045410.1142/S1758825117500454 ↗
38. Bongarde U · International Journal of Engineering & Technology · 2019 · 6 · 793
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.02010.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.020 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.020 ↗
41. 10.1002/app.3819710.1002/app.38197 ↗
42. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69427510.1080/01694243.2012.694275 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.10.01810.1016/j.mechmat.2015.10.018 ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2349810.1002/pc.23498 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10570-020-03447-510.1007/s10570-020-03447-5 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.046 ↗
47. 10.1515/epoly-2014-018610.1515/epoly-2014-0186 ↗
48. 10.1007/s12221-011-0919-110.1007/s12221-011-0919-1 ↗
49. 10.1002/pen.2404710.1002/pen.24047 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.03510.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.035 ↗
51. 10.1177/002199830934464710.1177/0021998309344647 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10965-012-9847-z10.1007/s10965-012-9847-z ↗
53. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.04110.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.041 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.06210.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.062 ↗
55. Siddika S · International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear Materials and Metallurgical Engineering · 2013 · 7 · 60
56. 10.1002/pc.2279410.1002/pc.22794 ↗
57. 10.1002/pc.2218410.1002/pc.22184 ↗
58. Khan A · American Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation · 2014 · 1 · 1
59. 10.1007/s10570-021-04140-x10.1007/s10570-021-04140-x ↗
60. 10.1007/s10570-021-03752-710.1007/s10570-021-03752-7 ↗
61. 10.1002/pi.599010.1002/pi.5990 ↗
62. 10.1002/app.2656710.1002/app.26567 ↗
63. 10.1177/089270571243956810.1177/0892705712439568 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.08510.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.085 ↗
65. Ghanbarzadeh B · 2013
66. 10.1007/978-1-4471-4108-2_210.1007/978-1-4471-4108-2_2 ↗
67. 10.1007/s10924-011-0317-110.1007/s10924-011-0317-1 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003 ↗
69. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9050-1_1010.1007/978-1-4419-9050-1_10 ↗
70. 10.1007/s42235-018-0091-z10.1007/s42235-018-0091-z ↗
71. 10.1155/2017/217832910.1155/2017/2178329 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.01710.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.017 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.003 ↗
74. 10.1163/156855112X62954010.1163/156855112X629540 ↗
75. 10.1002/pc.2448910.1002/pc.24489 ↗
76. 10.1002/pc.2499710.1002/pc.24997 ↗
77. Suardana NPG · Materials Physics and Mechanics · 2011 · 12 · 113
78. 10.15376/biores.12.4.7349-736210.15376/biores.12.4.7349-7362 ↗
79. 10.1002/anie.20130276610.1002/anie.201302766 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.008 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.08.02210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.08.022 ↗
82. ASTM · D-638: Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA · 2014
83. ASTM · D-570: Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA · 2017
84. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.10310.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.103 ↗
85. 10.1007/s10973-009-0346-310.1007/s10973-009-0346-3 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.03.01410.1016/j.talanta.2015.03.014 ↗
87. 10.1002/app.1995.07058040710.1002/app.1995.070580407 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.18210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.182 ↗
89. 10.1002/pc.2388910.1002/pc.23889 ↗
90. 10.1515/epoly-2020-001510.1515/epoly-2020-0015 ↗
91. 10.1177/00405175830530080510.1177/004051758305300805 ↗
92. 10.1080/0021846970801054010.1080/00218469708010540 ↗
93. 10.1515/hf-2018-011610.1515/hf-2018-0116 ↗
94. 10.1163/15685540677844072110.1163/156855406778440721 ↗
95. 10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00200-010.1016/S0165-2370(02)00200-0 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.005 ↗
97. 10.3390/ma1303080610.3390/ma13030806 ↗
98. 10.1007/s12221-014-1023-010.1007/s12221-014-1023-0 ↗
99. 10.1007/s12221-019-1061-810.1007/s12221-019-1061-8 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.02010.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.020 ↗