Glare Design Aspects and Philosophies
Source abstract
Abstract
The very nature of Glare is its crack bridging mechanism, which provides superior damage tolerance properties. Depending on the property, Glare shows either monolithic metal or composite behaviour, which challenges the definition of strength justification and certification procedures. Airworthiness regulations have to be interpreted for Glare in order to guarantee the same level of safety as obtained for aircraft structures made of other materials and to take at the same time benefit of its particular properties. Cut-outs are highly fatigue sensitive due to the stress concentrations they cause. In aircraft fuselages these cut-outs are quite large in the case of the windows and doors. The stress level may be increased through the application of Glare in the doubler packages, due to the improved fatigue behaviour compared to conventional aluminium. Glare also presents the possibility of tailoring the material to the load, i.e. fibres aligned with the load, e.g., a 45 degree orientation. FE analysis defined the total doubler package and a test programme was run to confirm the behaviour of the material and to predict the crack behaviour of the Glare door corner. Some aspects of the detailed design of aircraft structures in Glare, the design of splices and riveted joints are discussed. In order to apply Glare in very large fuselage panels, a splice concept was developed, which allows a number of longitudinal splices to be cured in the same curing cycle as the basic material. Through the introduction of this splicing concept, the width of a panel is no longer limited to the maximum width of the aluminium sheet. Internal local reinforcements (doublers) can be integrated into the panel during lay-up. A discussion on the design of riveted joints in Glare is held.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. ‘Glare Application for Primary A3XX Airbus Structure,’ Daimler Chrysler Aerospace Airbus Document, EMF-723/99, Issue 3, 2000.
2. de Vries, T. J., ‘The Residual Strength of Glare Laminates with Foreign Object Damage,’ Delft University of Technology, EADS Technology Seminar 2001.10.1007/978-94-010-0995-9_13 ↗
3. Hagenbeek, M., ‘Fatigue and Residual Strength Effect of Scratches,’ Delft University of Technology, Report B2V-00-14, 2000.
4. de Koning, A. and Schra, L., ‘Fatigue Crack Growth of Part through the Thickness Cracks in GLARE3 and GLARE4B Coupons,’ NLR, Report NLR-CR-2000.078, 2000.
5. Schmidt, H. J., ‘Current and Future Regulations, Design Goals and Industry Standards,’ Daimler Chrysler Aerospace Airbus, EMF-1/99, 1999.
6. ‘Aircraft Accident Report: Aloha Airlines, Flight 243, Boeing 737-200, N73711, near Maui, Hawaii, April 28, 1988, NTSB/AAR-89/03.’ Washington DC, U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, 1988.
7. Kieboom, O., ‘Fatigue Crack Initiation and Early Crack Growth in Glare at Different Temperatures,’ Master thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2000.
8. Graafmans, G., ‘Thermal Behaviour of FibreMetal Laminates,’ Delft University of Technology, Master thesis, 1995.
9. Bär, H., ‘Verifikation und Ergänzung von Berechnungsmethoden für die statische und dynamische Auslegung von GLARE Strukturen,’ Universität Stuttgart, Diplomarbeit, 1992.
10. Borgonje, B., ‘The Influence of Elevated Temperature on Glare after Exposure to Moisture,’ Delft University of Technology, Master thesis, 2000.
11. Heerschap, M. E., ‘Design of Cut-outs in Shell Structures,’ PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1997.
12. Brügemann, V. P. and de Kanter, J. L. C. G., ‘Fatigue Allowable for the Door Corner,’ B2V-00-54, Delft University of Technology, 2000.
13. Roebroeks, G., ‘The Development of the Splice Geometry for the Daimler-Benz Aerospace Airbus Glare 3-3/2-0.3 Barreltest Panel 1 & 2,’ Report TD-R-93-005B, Delft, Structural Laminates Company, 1995.
14. Roebroeks, G., ‘The Self Forming Technique; Recent Progress in the Development of a Method to Produce Large Aircraft Fuselage Panels of Glare,’ Report TD-R-97-007, Delft, Structural Laminates Company, 1997.
15. de Boer, H., ‘Shape Optimization of Fabric Reinforced Products. Design Sensitivy Analysis,’ Shaker Publishing, ISBN 90-9014817-5, 2001.