Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Fibre-Reinforced Composite Structures for Robotic Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study explores the variation in mechanical properties of additively manufactured composite structures for robotic applications with different infill densities and layer heights using fused deposition modelling (FDM). Glass fibre-reinforced polyamide (GFRP), and carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide (CFRP) filaments are used, and the specimens are printed with 20%, 40%, 60% and 100% infill density lattice structures for tensile and three-point bending tests. These printed samples are examined in the microscope to gain more understanding of the microstructure of the printed composites. To characterise the mechanical properties, a set of tensile and three-point bend tests are conducted on the manufactured composite samples. Test results indicate the variations in tensile strength and Young’s modulus of specimens based on the printing parameters and reveal the tensile and bending behaviour of those printed composite structures against varying infill ratios and reinforcing fibres. The experimental findings are also compared to analytical and empirical modelling approaches. Finally, based on the results, the applications of the additively manufactured structure to the robotic components are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Dilberoglu, U.M., Gharehpapagh, B., Yaman, U., Dolen, M.: The role of additive manufacturing in the era of industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 11, 545–554 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.14810.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148 ↗
2. Lee, C.H., Padzil, F.N.B.M., Lee, S.H., Ainun, Z.M.A., Abdullah, L.C.: Potential for natural fiber reinforcement in pla polymer filaments for fused deposition modeling (Fdm) additive manufacturing: A review. Polymers (Basel) 13, 1407 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1309140710.3390/polym13091407 ↗
3. Marimuthu, S., Clark, D., Allen, J., Kamara, A.M., Mativenga, P., Li, L., Scudamore, R.: Finite element modelling of substrate thermal distortion in direct laser additive manufacture of an aero-engine component. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 227, 1987–1999 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621247036310.1177/0954406212470363 ↗
4. ASTM: StandardTerminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (2016)
5. Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., Hui, D.: 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos. B Eng. 110, 442–458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
6. Nath, S.D., Nilufar, S.: An overview of additive manufacturing of polymers and associated composites. Polymers (Basel) 12, 1–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1211271910.3390/polym12112719 ↗
7. Antony, S., Cherouat, A., Montay, G.: Fabrication and characterization of hemp fibre based 3D printed honeycomb sandwich structure by FDM process. Appl. Compos. Mater. 27, 935–953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-020-09837-z10.1007/s10443-020-09837-z ↗
8. Aw, Y.Y., Yeoh, C.K., Idris, M.A., Teh, P.L., Hamzah, K.A., Sazali, S.A.: Effect of printing parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical, and thermoelectric properties of FDM 3D printed CABS/ZnO composites. Materials 11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1104046610.3390/ma11040466 ↗
9. Suteja, T.J., Soesanti, A.: Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Product for Various Infill Design Parameters: A Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1569 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/04201010.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/042010 ↗
10. Khan, S.A., Siddiqui, B.A., Fahad, M., Khan, M.A.: Evaluation of the effect of infill pattern on mechanical stregnth of additively manufactured specimen. Mater. Sci. Forum 887 MSF, 128–132 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.887.12810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.887.128 ↗
11. Quill, T.J., Smith, M.K., Zhou, T., Baioumy, M.G.S., Berenguer, J.P., Cola, B.A., Kalaitzidou, K., Bougher, T.L.: Thermal and mechanical properties of 3D printed boron nitride – ABS composites. Appl. Compos.Mater. 25, 1205–1217 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-017-9661-110.1007/s10443-017-9661-1 ↗
12. Chen, S., Li, D., Xiang, J., Zhao, S.: Composite manufacturing cost model targeting on design optimization. Appl. Compos. Mater. 27, 673–691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-020-09828-010.1007/s10443-020-09828-0 ↗
13. Wang, K., Xie, X., Wang, J., Zhao, A., Peng, Y., Rao, Y.: Effects of infill characteristics and strain rate on the deformation and failure properties of additively manufactured polyamide-based composite structures. Results Phys. 18,(2020)10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103346 ↗
14. Kovan, V., Altan, G., Topal, E.S.: Effect of layer thickness and print orientation on strength of 3D printed and adhesively bonded single lap joints. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 31, 2197–2201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-0415-710.1007/s12206-017-0415-7 ↗
15. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S.: Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater. Des. 31, 287–295 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
16. Gonabadi, H., Yadav, A., Bull, S.J.: The effect of processing parameters on the mechanical characteristics of PLA produced by a 3D FFF printer. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 111, 695–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06138-410.1007/s00170-020-06138-4 ↗
17. Fernandez-Vicente, M., Calle, W., Ferrandiz, S., Conejero, A.: Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 3, 183–192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.003610.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
18. Ćwikła, G., Grabowik, C., Kalinowski, K., Paprocka, I., Ociepka, P.: The influence of printing parameters on selected mechanical properties of FDM/FFF 3D-printed parts. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 227, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/01203310.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033 ↗
19. Sukindar, N.A. Bin, Bin, M.K.A.M.A., Hang Tuah Bin, B.T.B., Binti, C.N.A.J., Bin, M.I.S.I.: Analysis on the impact process parameters on tensile strength using 3d printer repetier-host software. ARPN J. Engi. Appl. Sci. 12, 3341–3346 (2017)
20. Clausen, A., Aage, N., Sigmund, O.: Exploiting additive manufacturing infill in topology optimization for improved buckling load. Engineering 2, 250–257 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.00610.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.006 ↗
21. Wu, J., Clausen, A., Sigmund, O.: Minimum compliance topology optimization of shell–infill composites for additive manufacturing. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 326, 358–375 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.01810.1016/j.cma.2017.08.018 ↗
22. Cojocaru, V.: Influence of rectilinear infill parameters on mechanical behavior of 3D printed parts - a fem approach. Robotica Manag. 24, 4–8 (2019)
23. Cojocaru, V., Miclosina, C.: Influence of rectilinear infill parameters on stress state of mechanical structures components. Robotica Manag. 25, 4–12 (2020)
24. Plocher, J., Panesar, A.: Effect of density and unit cell size grading on the stiffness and energy absorption of short fibre-reinforced functionally graded lattice structures. Addit Manuf. 33, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10117110.1016/j.addma.2020.101171 ↗
25. Peng, C., Fox, K., Qian, M., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Tran, P.: 3D printed sandwich beams with bioinspired cores: Mechanical performance and modelling. Thin-Walled Struct. 161,(2021)10.1016/j.tws.2021.107471 ↗
26. Becker, W.: Closed-form analysis of the thickness effect of regular honeycomb core material. Compos. Struct. 48, 67–70 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00074-410.1016/S0263-8223(99)00074-4 ↗
27. Nasirov, A., Fidan, I.: Prediction of mechanical properties of fused filament fabricated structures via asymptotic homogenization. Mech. Mater. 145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10337210.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103372 ↗
28. Maskery, I., Ashcroft, I.A.: The deformation and elastic anisotropy of a new gyroid-based honeycomb made by laser sintering. Addit Manuf. 36,(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10154810.1016/j.addma.2020.101548 ↗
29. Zhang, H., Yang, D., Sheng, Y.: Performance-driven 3D printing of continuous curved carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites: A preliminary numerical study. Compos. B Eng. 151, 256–264 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.017 ↗
30. Pascual-González, C., Iragi, M., Fernández, A., Fernández-Blázquez, J.P., Aretxabaleta, L., Lopes, C.S.: An approach to analyse the factors behind the micromechanical response of 3D-printed composites. Compos. B Eng. 186 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10782010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107820 ↗
31. Yamawaki, M., Kouno, Y.: Fabrication and mechanical characterization of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic using a preform by three-dimensional printing and via hot-press molding. Adv. Compos. Mater. 27, 209–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2017.136884010.1080/09243046.2017.1368840 ↗
32. Abouzaid, K., Bassir, D., Guessasma, S., Yue, H.: Modelling the process of fused deposition modelling and the effect of temperature on the mechanical, roughness, and porosity properties of resulting composite products. Mech. Compos. Mater. 56, 805–816 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-021-09925-610.1007/s11029-021-09925-6 ↗
33. Justo, J., Távara, L., García-Guzmán, L., París, F.: Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos. Struct. 185, 537–548 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052 ↗
34. Kuncius, T., Rimašauskas, M., Rimašauskienė, R.: Interlayer adhesion analysis of 3d-printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced composites. Polymers (Basel) 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1310165310.3390/polym13101653 ↗
35. Hou, Z., Tian, X., Zhang, J., Li, D.: 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced composite corrugated structure. Compos. Struct. 184, 1005–1010 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.080 ↗
36. Melenka, G.W., Cheung, B.K.O., Schofield, J.S., Dawson, M.R., Carey, J.P.: Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures. Compos. Struct. 153, 866–875 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018 ↗
37. Goh, G.D., Dikshit, V., An, J., Yeong, W.Y.: Process-structure-property of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic: an investigation of mode I interlaminar fracture toughness. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 0, 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.182126610.1080/15376494.2020.1821266 ↗
38. Bakis, C.E., Haluza, R.T., Bartolai, J., Kim, J.J., Simpson, T.W.: Assessment of anisotropic mechanical properties of a 3D printed carbon whisker reinforced composite. Adv. Compos. Mater. 28, 545–560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.165203010.1080/09243046.2019.1652030 ↗
39. Balla, V.K., Kate, K.H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., Tadimeti, J.G.D.: Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Compos. B Eng. 174,(2019)10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 ↗
40. Ivey, M., Melenka, G.W., Carey, J.P., Ayranci, C.: Characterizing short-fiber-reinforced composites produced using additive manufacturing. Adv. Manuf. Polym. Compos. Sci. 3, 81–91 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/20550340.2017.134112510.1080/20550340.2017.1341125 ↗
41. Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J., Wang, S.: Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos. B Eng. 80, 369–378 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
42. Nour, A., Mechakra, H., Benkoussas, B., Tawfiq, I., Settet, A.T., Renane, R.: Modeling a composite reinforced with short alfa fibers to determine its fatigue and structural homogenization. Mech. Compos. Mater. 54, 487–498 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-018-9758-010.1007/s11029-018-9758-0 ↗
43. Nasirov, A., Gupta, A., Hasanov, S., Fidan, I.: Three-scale asymptotic homogenization of short fiber reinforced additively manufactured polymer composites. Compos. B Eng. 202, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10826910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108269 ↗
44. Al Abadi, H., Thai, H.T., Paton-Cole, V., Patel, V.I.: Elastic properties of 3D printed fibre-reinforced structures. Compos. Struct. 193, 8–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.051 ↗
45. Tüfekci, M., Özkal, B., Maharaj, C., Liu, H., Dear, J.P., Salles, L.: Strain-rate-dependent mechanics and impact performance of epoxy-based nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 233,(2023)10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109870 ↗
46. Tekinalp, H.L., Kunc, V., Velez-Garcia, G.M., Duty, C.E., Love, L.J., Naskar, A.K., Blue, C.A., Ozcan, S.: Highly oriented carbon fiber-polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos. Sci. Technol. 105, 144–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
47. Griffini, G., Invernizzi, M., Levi, M., Natale, G., Postiglione, G., Turri, S.: 3D-printable CFR polymer composites with dual-cure sequential IPNs. Polymer (Guildf) 91, 174–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.04810.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.048 ↗
48. Naima Khalid, N., Afiqah Mohd Radzuan, N., Bakar Sulong, A., Mohd Foudzi, F.: A review on bonding of Polyamide reinforced carbon fibre via additive manufacturing. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1078, 012004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1078/1/01200410.1088/1757-899x/1078/1/012004 ↗
49. Abderrafai, Y., Hadi Mahdavi, M., Sosa-Rey, F., Hérard, C., Otero Navas, I., Piccirelli, N., Lévesque, M., Therriault, D.: Additive manufacturing of short carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide composites by fused filament fabrication: Formulation, manufacturing and characterization. Mater. Des. 214,(2022)10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110358 ↗
50. Al Rashid, A., Ikram, H., Koç, M.: Additive manufacturing and mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced Polyamide-6 composites. Mater. Today Proc. 62, 6359–6363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.33910.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.339 ↗
51. K., P., M., M., P., S.P.: Technologies in additive manufacturing for fiber reinforced composite materials: a review. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 28, 51–59 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.01.00110.1016/j.coche.2020.01.001 ↗
52. Jansson, A., Pejryd, L.: Characterisation of carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide manufactured by selective laser sintering. Addit Manuf. 9, 7–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.12.00310.1016/j.addma.2015.12.003 ↗
53. Roy, R., Park, S.J., Kweon, J.H., Choi, J.H.: Characterization of Nomex honeycomb core constituent material mechanical properties. Compos. Struct. 117, 255–266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.033 ↗
54. Li, N., Link, G., Wang, T., Ramopoulos, V., Neumaier, D., Hofele, J., Walter, M., Jelonnek, J.: Path-designed 3D printing for topological optimized continuous carbon fibre reinforced composite structures. Compos. B Eng. 182,(2020)10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107612 ↗
55. Srivastava, M., Rathee, S.: Optimisation of FDM process parameters by Taguchi method for imparting customised properties to components. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 13, 203–210 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.144072210.1080/17452759.2018.1440722 ↗
56. Zhang, Y., Chou, Y.K.: Three-dimensional finite element analysis simulations of the fused deposition modelling process. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf. 220, 1663–1671 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM57210.1243/09544054JEM572 ↗
57. Bellehumeur, C., Li, L., Sun, Q., Gu, P.: Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J. Manuf. Proc. 6, 170–178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-710.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-7 ↗
58. Penumakala, P.K., Santo, J., Thomas, A.: A critical review on the fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic polymer composites. Compos. B Eng. 201,(2020)10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336 ↗
59. Lieneke, T., Denzer, V., Adam, G.A.O., Zimmer, D.: Dimensional tolerances for additive manufacturing: Experimental investigation for fused deposition modeling. Procedia CIRP 43, 286–291 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.36110.1016/j.procir.2016.02.361 ↗
60. Wittbrodt, B., Pearce, J.M.: The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components. Addit Manuf. 8, 110–116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.00610.1016/j.addma.2015.09.006 ↗
61. Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., Ziemi, S.: Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Mech. Eng. (2012). https://doi.org/10.5772/3423310.5772/34233 ↗
62. Alaimo, G., Marconi, S., Costato, L., Auricchio, F.: Influence of meso-structure and chemical composition on FDM 3D-printed parts. Compos. B Eng. 113, 371–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.019 ↗
63. Romanowski, H., Bierkandt, F.S., Luch, A., Laux, P.: Summary and derived risk assessment of 3D printing emission studies. Atmos. Environ. 294,(2023)10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119501 ↗
64. Parandoush, P., Lin, D.: A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos. Struct. 182, 36–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
65. Vaezi, M., Yang, S.: Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 10, 123–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.109705310.1080/17452759.2015.1097053 ↗
66. Denimal, E., El Haddad, F., Wong, C., Salles, L.: Topological optimization of under-platform dampers with moving morphable components and global optimization algorithm for nonlinear frequency response. Proc. ASME Turbo Expo. 2D-2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-1439410.1115/GT2020-14394 ↗
67. ASTM-D882-10: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. (2010)
68. ASTM INTERNATIONAL: Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. D790. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 1–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1520/D0790-17.210.1520/D0790-17.2 ↗
69. Baich, L., Manogharan, G., Marie, H.: Study of infill print design on production cost-time of 3D printed ABS parts Liseli Baich, Guha Manogharan. Int. J. Rapid Manuf. 5, 308–319 (2015)10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.074809 ↗
70. Materials, P., Materials, E.I., Matrix, P., Materials, C., Specimens, P.: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. 1, 1–15 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14.110.1520/D0638-14.1 ↗
71. Barbero, E.J.: Finite element analysis of composite materials using Abaqus. (2013)10.1201/b14788 ↗
72. Gay, D., Hoa, S. V., Tsai, S.W.: Composite materials: Design and applications. (2002)10.1201/9781420031683 ↗
73. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T.Q., Hui, D.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. B Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
74. Omar, N.W.Y., Shuaib, N.A., Hadi, M.H.J.A., Azmi, A.I.: Mechanical properties of carbon and glass fibre reinforced composites produced by additive manufacturing: A short review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 670 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/670/1/01202010.1088/1757-899X/670/1/012020 ↗
75. Tüfekci, M.: Performance evaluation analysis of Ti-6Al-4V foam fan blades in aircraft engines: A numerical study. Compos. Part C: Open Access 12,(2023)10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100414 ↗
76. Fuller, J., Mitchell, S., Pozegic, T., Wu, X., Longana, M., Wisnom, M.: Experimental evaluation of hygrothermal effects on pseudo-ductile thin ply angle-ply carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos. B Eng. 227,(2021)10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109388 ↗
77. Acarer, S., Pir, İ, Tüfekci, M., Erkoç, T., Güneş Durak, S., Öztekin, V., Türkoǧlu Demirkol, G., Özçoban, M.Ş, Temelli Çoban, T.Y., Ćavuş, S., Tüfekci, N.: Halloysite nanotube-enhanced polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes: Fabrication, characterization, and performance evaluation. ACS Omega 8, 34729–34745 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0365510.1021/acsomega.3c03655 ↗
78. Acarer, S., Pir, İ., Tüfekci, M., Erkoҫ, T., Öztekin, V., Durak, S.G., Özҫoban, M.Ş., Demirkol, G.T., Alhammod, M., avuş, S., Tüfekci, N.: Characterisation and modelling the mechanics of cellulose nanofibril added polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Heliyon 9, e13086 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1308610.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13086 ↗
79. Acarer, S., Pir, İ, Tüfekci, M., Erkoç, T., Öztekin, V., Dikicioğlu, C., Demirkol, G.T., Durak, S.G., Özçoban, M.Ş, Çoban, T.Y.T., Çavuş, S., Tüfekci, N.: Characterisation and Mechanical Modelling of Polyacrylonitrile-Based Nanocomposite Membranes Reinforced with Silica Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 12, 3721 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1221372110.3390/nano12213721 ↗