CNC-loaded hydrogel particles generated from single- and double-emulsion drops
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) suspensions were processed for the first time in microcapillary microfluidic devices with the goal of fabricating CNC-loaded monodisperse hydrogel particles from single- and double-emulsion drops. CNC suspensions ranging from 2 to 12 wt% showed an increase in viscosity and shear thinning due to strong nanofiber interactions in solution. Despite their high viscosities, it was possible to generate monodisperse single-emulsion drops in polydimethylsiloxane oil with CNC concentrations up to 12 wt% and diameters ranging from 15 to 150 µm. CNC–poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogel particles with concentrations up to 10 wt% and sizes ranging from 50 to 80 µm were also generated from single-emulsion drops and survived cleaning, drying and re-hydration. CNC–PEGDA hydrogel particles with concentrations up to 61 wt% were obtained from double-emulsion drops. Overall, this study demonstrates a robust path for the fabrication of CNC-loaded hydrogel particles using microcapillary devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate Student, School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Undergraduate Student, Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Assistant Professor, Physics Department, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA, USA
Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of PuertoRico-Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR, USA
Associate Professor, School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr900339w10.1021/cr900339w ↗
2. 10.1021/bm900520n10.1021/bm900520n ↗
3. 10.1039/c0cs00108b10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
4. 10.1039/B806789A10.1039/B806789A ↗
5. Kalia S. · International Journal of Polymer Science · 2011 · 2011
6. 10.5772/2432310.5772/24323 ↗
7. Jackson J. K. · International Journal of Nanomedicine · 2011 · 6 · 321
8. 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-010.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.01110.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.015 ↗
11. Zhou Y. · Science Reports · 2013 · 3 · 1
12. 10.1039/C2SM26472B10.1039/C2SM26472B ↗
13. 10.1002/mabi.20110035110.1002/mabi.201100351 ↗
14. 10.1021/la401998610.1021/la4019986 ↗
15. 10.1098/rsif.2010.0133.focus10.1098/rsif.2010.0133.focus ↗
16. 10.1021/ma201649f10.1021/ma201649f ↗
17. 10.1023/A:100926051193910.1023/A:1009260511939 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.110916410.1126/science.1109164 ↗
19. 10.1122/1.476408010.1122/1.4764080 ↗
20. 10.1021/la303380v10.1021/la303380v ↗
21. 10.1021/la991118010.1021/la9911180 ↗
22. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00229-410.1016/0376-7388(95)00229-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/0266-3538(86)90040-010.1016/0266-3538(86)90040-0 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.05130110.1103/PhysRevE.67.051301 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.369933110.1063/1.3699331 ↗