journal article·2018-02

Effect of nanoclay localization on the peel performance of PE based blend nanocomposite sealants

Raziyeh S. Mohammadi, Seyed H. Tabatabaei, Abdellah Ajji

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Polyethylene (PE) based clay polymer nanocomposites (CPN) are of great importance to generate peelable seals in packaging industry. This study shows the significant effect of organoclay (OC) localization in PE-based blend sealants on their peel properties, for the first time. Two different immiscible blends composed of PE/ethylene-methyl acrylate copolymer (EMA) and PE/ethylene-methyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer (EMA-GMA) were examined for their potential to generate peelable seals upon addition of organo-modified montmorillonite (OMt). WAXD results and TEM observations reveal that OC is localized at the interface of PE/EMA phases while it is localized within the dispersed EMA-GMA phase in the PE/EMA-GMA blend, which is in agreement with the thermodynamic predictions. The incorporation of 4 phr OC converts the lock seal behavior of the PE/EMA blend seal to a peelable behavior over a wide peelable heat seal temperature range (over 35 °C). In contrast, the OC/PE/EMA-GMA nanocomposite sealant, in which OC is mostly located within the EMA-GMA phase, shows lock seal performance similar to the PE/EMA-GMA neat blend.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Science and PVC

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Application of linear rheology in determination of nanoclay localization in PLA/EVA/Clay nanocomposites: correlation with microstructure and thermal properties10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.064 ↗
2. Impact of product packaging on Consumer's buying behavior
3. Analysing the chemical composition distribution of ethylene-acrylate copolymers: comparison of HT-HPLC, CRYSTAF and TREF10.1002/macp.200800223 ↗
4. Dynamics of migration and phase selective localization of nanoclay in HNBR/ENR blends10.1002/app.44074 ↗
5. Nanoclay compatibilization of phase separated polysulfone/polyimide films for oxygen barrier10.1016/j.clay.2016.12.012 ↗
6. Berbert, O.T., 2012. Easy-open packages formed from peelable thermoplastic laminates. US8147934 B2.
7. Thermal and spectroscopic studies on the decomposition of [Ni{di(2-aminoethyl)amine}(2)]- and [Ni(2,2′, 6′,2 - terpyridine)(2)]-montmorillonite intercalated composites10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00410-4 ↗
8. Chou, R.T., 2011. Blends of ethylene copolymers with high-frequency weldability. US7879949 B2.
9. Plastics in food packaging
10. Preparation and characterization of low density polyethylene/ethylene methyl acrylate glycidyl methacrylate/organoclay nanocomposites10.1002/app.33482 ↗
11. Effect of blending sequence on microstructure of ternary nanocomposites10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.145 ↗
12. On localization of clay nanoparticles in polypropylene/poly(lactic acid) blend nanocomposites: correlation with mechanical properties10.1080/00222348.2016.1151475 ↗
13. Migration of nanosilica particles in polymer blends10.1002/polb.21534 ↗
14. Immiscible polymer blends stabilized with nano-silica particles: rheology and effective interfacial tension10.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.018 ↗
15. Interfacial failure in adhesive joints: experiments and predictions10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.004 ↗
16. Uneven distribution of nanoparticles in immiscible fluids: morphology development in polymer blends10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.029 ↗
17. Specific adhesion model for bonding hot-melt polyamides to vinyl10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.11.008 ↗
18. Galloway, D., 2008. Easy peel film structures. US7314669 B2.
19. The kinetics of CNT transfer between immiscible blend phases during melt mixing10.1016/j.polymer.2011.11.039 ↗
20. The importance of packaging in purchase and usage behaviour10.1111/ijcs.12168 ↗
21. Effects of nanoclay addition on phase morphology and stability of polycarbonate/styrene-acrylonitrile blends10.1016/j.clay.2017.02.001 ↗
22. Kinetic and thermodynamic control of the selective localization of carbon black at the Interface of immiscible polymer blends10.1021/cm970594d ↗
23. Effect of ethylene glycidyl methacrylate compatibilizer on the structure and mechanical properties of clay nanocomposites modified with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer10.1002/app.25512 ↗
24. Innovations in food packaging
25. Hawes, D.H., Sasthav, M., 2006. Tear resistant heat sealable packaging structure. US7144635 B2.
26. The role of organically modified layered silicate in the breakup and coalescence of droplets in PBT/PE blends10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.077 ↗
27. Shear-induced migration of nanoclay during morphology evolution of PBT/PS blend10.1002/app.27330 ↗
28. Hwo, C.C., 1987. Packaging film and sheet capable of forming peelable seals with good optics. US20050266257 A1.
29. Localization of micro- and nano-silica particles in heterophase poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends10.1016/j.polymer.2015.08.046 ↗
30. Effect of organoclay platelets on morphology of nylon-6 and poly(ethylene- ran -propylene) rubber blends10.1021/ma0352072 ↗
31. Kinigakis, P., Pokusa, K., Albaum, G., Jones, A., Frederickson, E., 2016. Peelable composite thermoplastic sealants in packaging films. US9309027 B2.
32. Nanocomposites based on polycarbonate/poly (butylene terephthalate) blends effects of distribution and type of nanoclay on morphological behavior10.1002/vnl.21313 ↗
33. Synthesis of epoxy–clay nanocomposites. Influence of the nature of the curing agent on structure10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00801-6 ↗
34. Laske, L.L., 2016. Easy open flexible container. US9302835 B2.
35. Lee · 2005
36. Morphology and properties of poly(propylene)/ethylene-octene copolymer blends containing nanosilica10.1002/mame.201100147 ↗
37. Liang, Y., Kinigakis, P., Rossi, F.J., 2017. Peelable sealant containing thermoplastic composite blends for packaging applications. US9533472 B2.
38. Practical case studies: easy opening for consumer-friendly, peelable packaging10.1163/156856111X599544 ↗
39. Practical approach in developing desirable peel-seal and clear lidding films based on poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends
40. Longo, E., 2002. Ternary polymer blend, the film containing it, and the easy-to-open package made therewith. US6476137 B1.
41. Synthesis and characterization of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites10.1002/app.2223 ↗
42. Morphology and properties of nylon6 and high density polyethylene blends in absence and presence of nanoclay10.1002/app.33580 ↗
43. Effect of nanoclay on the morphology and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/high-density polyethylene blends10.1002/app.31444 ↗
44. Polyethylene nanocomposite heat-sealants with a versatile peelable character10.1002/marc.200800553 ↗
45. Interfacial interactions in PP/MMT/SEBS nanocomposites10.1021/ma901952p ↗
46. Durability of corona discharge and low-pressure air plasma-treated ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers (EVAs)10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.03.001 ↗
47. Effect of polymorphism of isotactic polybutene-1 on peel behavior of polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel systems10.1002/app.27483 ↗
48. Fracture mechanics on polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel films10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.09.002 ↗
49. Influence of processing conditions on the peel behavior of polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel systems10.1177/8756087909343139 ↗
50. Adhesive properties of heat-sealed EVAc/PE films in dependence on recipe, processing, and sealing parameters10.1080/01694243.2014.889431 ↗
51. Influence of the Form II/Form I crystal polymorphism of random copolymers of butene-1 with ethylene or propylene on the peel behavior of peel films10.1002/pen.24013 ↗
52. Effects of nanoclay and its localization on the morphology stabilization of PLA/PBAT blends under shear flow10.1016/j.polymer.2016.06.044 ↗
53. Effect of nanoclay loading on the thermal and mechanical properties of biodegradable polylactide/poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate] blend composites10.1021/am201850m ↗
54. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers10.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
55. A review on polymer–layered silicate nanocomposites10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008 ↗
56. Influence of the intercalated cations on the surface energy of montmorillonites: consequences for the morphology and gas barrier properties of polyethylene/montmorillonites nanocomposites10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.006 ↗
57. Linear viscoelasticity of disordered polystyrene−polyisoprene block copolymer based layered-silicate nanocomposites10.1021/ma992091u ↗
58. Rivett, J.W., Tanny, S.R., Hahm, D.M., 2003. Peelably sealed packaging. US6630237 B2.
59. Improved adhesion of polyethylene by copolymerisation of ethylene with polar monomers10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00093-8 ↗
60. Schell, T.A., Pockat, G.R., 2006. Heat-shrinkable packaging films with improved sealing properties and articles made thereof. US7147930 B2.
61. Evaluation of surface energy of solid polymers using different models10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000620)76:12<1831::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
62. Compatibilizing bulk polymer blends by using organoclays compatibilizing bulk polymer blends by using organoclays10.1021/ma060125+ ↗
63. Compatibilization efficiency of organoclay in an immiscible polycarbonate/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend10.1002/marc.200400586 ↗
64. Carbon nanotubes in blends of polycaprolactone/thermoplastic starch10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.024 ↗
65. Selective localisation of multi walled carbon nanotubes in polypropylene/natural rubber blends to reduce the percolation threshold10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.021 ↗
66. Stabilization of PE/PEO cocontinuous blends by interfacial nanoclays10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00354 ↗
67. Ursino, F., 2009. Hermetically Sealable, Easy-Openable, Flexible Container of Heat-Shrinkable Thermoplastic Material. US20090017239 A1.
68. Structural and rheological investigation of interphase in polyethylene/polyamide/nanoclay ternary blends10.1016/j.polymer.2012.02.040 ↗
69. Compatibilizing poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nylon-6 blends with nanoclay10.1021/ma071508q ↗
70. A rheological method to compare the degree of exfoliation of nanocomposites10.1016/j.polymer.2003.01.001 ↗
71. Wu · 1982
72. Selective localization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in poly(ε-caprolactone)/polylactide blend10.1021/bm801183f ↗
73. Migration of MWCNTs during melt preparation of ABS/PC/MWCNT conductive composites via PC/MWCNT masterbatch approach10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.044 ↗
74. Morphology and mechanical properties of rubber toughened amorphous polyamide/MMT nanocomposites10.1021/ma902232g ↗
75. Morphology and electrical properties of short carbon fiber-filled polymer blends: high-density polyethylene/poly (methyl methacrylate)10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980829)69:9<1813::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
76. Tailored polyethylene nanocomposite sealants: broad-range peelable heat-seals through designed filler/polymer interfaces10.1163/156856108X379182 ↗
77. Tuning the dielectric properties of polystyrene/poly(vinylidene fluoride) blends by selectively localizing carbon black nanoparticles10.1021/jp310021r ↗