journal article·2008-06

Determination of clay plasticity: Indentation method versus Pfefferkorn method

Cláudio de Oliveira Modesto, Adriano Michael Bernardin

Applied Clay Science· Volume 40· Issue 1-4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract As a basis of ceramic process development, raw material selection plays a fundamental role in the final product design. For correct material selection, knowledge regarding all the properties of the raw materials should be obtained. Plasticity is one of the most important properties for molding clay products. Nevertheless, the standard methods in use, including the Pfefferkorn method, are not precise and reliable. They are based on subjective qualitative information and are dependent on technical skills. The literature shows some attempts to improve the test method, all based on the force needed to indent a clay sample surface with specific water content. Four different clays were studied and the plasticity values due to the Pfefferkorn method and the indentation test were compared. The results showed that the indentation method is reliable and more precise compared to Pfefferkorn. It is also faster and more practical.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Materials Engineering and Processing · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. The combined effect of clay and moisture content on the behavior of remolded unsaturated soils10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00032-1 ↗
2. Plasticity and geophysical flows: a review10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.05.005 ↗
3. Plasticity of clays: US ARMY C.R.R.E.L10.1016/0148-9062(75)90407-6 ↗
4. Workability test method for metals applied to examine a workability measure (plastic limit) for clays10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00042-4 ↗
5. Effects of methods of drying on the engineering behavior of clays10.1016/0169-1317(94)90017-5 ↗
6. Swelling-shrinkage behavior of natural expansive clays10.1016/S0169-1317(96)00009-9 ↗
7. Bergaya · 2006
8. The application of clay minerals in ceramics10.1016/0169-1317(91)90016-3 ↗
9. A comparison of the Casagrande and fall cone penetrometer methods for liquid limit determination in marls from Crete, Greece10.1016/0013-7952(91)90002-3 ↗
10. Poroplastic damage model for claystones10.1016/j.clay.2003.12.019 ↗
11. A simple anisotropic clay plasticity model10.1016/S0093-6413(02)00252-5 ↗
12. Assessing the plasticity of ceramic masses by determining indentation force
13. Determination of clay plasticity: indentation method vs. Pfefferkorn method
14. Numerical implementation of a new rheological law for argillites10.1016/j.clay.2003.12.029 ↗
15. Effects of organic matter on the physical and the physicochemical properties of an illitic soil10.1016/S0169-1317(99)00003-4 ↗
16. Overview: clay mineral applications10.1016/0169-1317(91)90014-Z ↗
17. Determination of undrained shear strength of low plasticity clays10.1016/0148-9062(91)93339-8 ↗
18. Stress relaxation of five different soil samples when uniaxially compacted at different water contents10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00213-6 ↗
19. Chemo-mechanical interactions in clay: a correlation between clay mineralogy and Atterberg limits10.1016/j.clay.2003.12.015 ↗
20. A unified plasticity model for cyclic behaviour of clay and sand10.1016/j.mechrescom.2006.06.010 ↗