journal article·2025-01-01Open access

Antibacterial Activity of Polyethylene Nonwoven Wipes Treated With Essential Oils

Tho Luu Thi, Tuan Anh Nguyen

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

This study investigates the antibacterial activity of polyethylene nonwoven wipes treated with 13 types of commercially natural essential oils in Vietnam. The mechanical properties of 11 types of polyethylene nonwoven fabrics were examined to find a suitable material for antibacterial treatments. The findings of the inhibition zone on antibacterial treated samples against Gram-negative ( Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive ( Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria by the disk diffusion method indicated that essential oils from rosemary, clove, lilium, champak, Cinnamomum, melaleuca, and basil could completely inhibit both E. coli and S. aureus. The naturally treated products presented the highest antibacterial activities at 1%, 5%, and 7% of Cinnamomum, basil and clove essential oils, respectively. The antibacterial effects of Cinnamomum, basil, and clove on nonwoven fabrics increased with the liquid content, and the padding pressure should be adjusted to lower than 1.8 bar. Also, the survey results for skin allergy and fragrant feeling demonstrated that wipes treated with basil showed the most positive evaluations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bee Products Chemical Analysis · Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Garment Technology and Fashion Design, Hanoi University of Industry, Hanoi City, Vietnam

Faculty of Fashion and Tourism, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-540-49339-6_410.1007/978-3-540-49339-6_4 ↗
2. 10.1201/9781351246460-310.1201/9781351246460-3 ↗
3. 10.1201/9781351246460-510.1201/9781351246460-5 ↗
4. 10.3390/molecules2611341210.3390/molecules26113412 ↗
5. McCaskill D · 2006 · 107
6. 10.5772/intechopen.9142610.5772/intechopen.91426 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-030-16546-8_110.1007/978-3-030-16546-8_1 ↗
8. 10.21448/ijsm.112186010.21448/ijsm.1121860 ↗
9. 10.1093/jac/47.5.56510.1093/jac/47.5.565 ↗
10. 10.1159/00020719610.1159/000207196 ↗
11. 10.1002/tqem.2188210.1002/tqem.21882 ↗
12. 10.1111/1541-4337.1200610.1111/1541-4337.12006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.06110.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.061 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.00810.1016/j.fct.2010.04.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1572-5995(00)80014-910.1016/S1572-5995(00)80014-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.10610.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106 ↗
17. 10.1080/10412905.1989.969776710.1080/10412905.1989.9697767 ↗
18. 10.2174/092986703345771910.2174/0929867033457719 ↗
19. 10.3390/plants1319278410.3390/plants13192784 ↗
20. 10.1080/10412905.2003.969863110.1080/10412905.2003.9698631 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11149810.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111498 ↗
22. 10.1002/1099-1573(200008)14:5<323::AID-PTR621>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/1099-1573(200008)14:5<323::AID-PTR621>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
23. 10.1021/jf060608c10.1021/jf060608c ↗
24. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.03310.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.033 ↗
25. 10.1186/1472-6882-14-22510.1186/1472-6882-14-225 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.06.02810.1016/j.ibiod.2012.06.028 ↗
27. Wang C · Fibres Text East Eur · 2005 · 13 · 41
28. 10.1007/s12221-013-1295-910.1007/s12221-013-1295-9 ↗
29. El-Molla MM · J Eng Fibers Fabr · 2022 · 17