journal article·2022-07-01Open access

Chiral standing spin waves in skyrmion lattice

Andrii S. Savchenko, Vladyslav M. Kuchkin, Filipp N. Rybakov, Stefan Blügel, Nikolai S. Kiselev

APL Materials· Volume 10· Issue 7

Abstract

This work studies the resonance excitations of the three-dimensional skyrmions lattice in the finite thickness plate of an isotropic chiral magnet using spin dynamics simulations. We found that the absorption spectra and resonance modes differ from those predicted by the two-dimensional model and the model of the unconfined bulk crystal. The features observed on the spectra can be explained by the formation of chiral standing spin waves, which, contrary to conventional standing spin waves, are characterized by the helical profile of dynamic magnetization of fixed chirality that is defined by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. In this case, the dynamic susceptibility becomes a function of the plate thickness, which gives rise to an interesting effect that manifests itself in periodical fading of the intensity of corresponding modes and makes excitation of these modes impossible at specific thicknesses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Peter Grünberg Institut and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich and JARA 1 , D-52425 Jülich, Germany

Donetsk Institute for Physics and Engineering, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 , 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine

Department of Physics, RWTH Aachen University 3 , 52056 Aachen, Germany

Uppsala University 4 , SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden

KTH Royal Institute of Technology 5 , SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

Funding

European Research Council

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 1975
2. 1979
3. J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1958 · 4 · 24110.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 120 · 9110.1103/physrev.120.91 ↗
5. Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 10610.1038/nmat2916 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 19241010.1063/1.5004394 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 19720310.1103/physrevlett.120.197203 ↗
8. Nat. Phys. · 2018 · 14 · 83210.1038/s41567-018-0155-3 ↗
9. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1984 · 53 · 272610.1143/jpsj.53.2726 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 22444010.1103/physrevb.73.224440 ↗
11. Science · 2009 · 323 · 91510.1126/science.1166767 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 91 · 05441110.1103/physrevb.91.054411 ↗
13. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 33710.1038/nnano.2014.52 ↗
14. Nature · 2010 · 465 · 90110.1038/nature09124 ↗
15. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 72310.1038/nnano.2013.174 ↗
16. Nat. Phys. · 2018 · 14 · 93610.1038/s41567-018-0184-y ↗
17. Sci. Adv. · 2018 · 4 · eaat732310.1126/sciadv.aat7323 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 01440610.1103/physrevb.90.014406 ↗
19. Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 850410.1038/ncomms9504 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 09442410.1103/physrevb.87.094424 ↗
21. New J. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 04500210.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045002 ↗
22. 1996
23. Phys. Rev. · 1958 · 110 · 129510.1103/physrev.110.1295 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1958 · 1 · 16810.1103/physrevlett.1.168 ↗
25. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 29300210.1088/1361-6463/aa7573 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 18442210.1103/physrevb.88.184422 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1975 · 35 · 101710.1103/physrevlett.35.1017 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 2 · 12440110.1103/physrevmaterials.2.124401 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 03240810.1063/1.4995240 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 24721110.1103/physrevlett.108.247211 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2021 · 126 · 01720210.1103/physrevlett.126.017202 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 21442910.1103/physrevb.99.214429 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Res. · 2021 · 3 · 03310410.1103/physrevresearch.3.033104 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 01760110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.017601 ↗
35. 2009
36. J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 38210.1063/1.323339 ↗
37. 1975
38. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 15600110.1088/0953-8984/25/15/156001 ↗
39. F. N. Rybakov and E. Babaev, Excalibur software, see http://quantumandclassical.com/excalibur/.
40. AIP Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 10713310.1063/1.4899186 ↗
41. N. S. Kiselev, Magnoom software, see https://github.com/n-s-kiselev/magnoom/.
42. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 242–245 · 103810.1016/s0304-8853(01)01126-x ↗
43. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 01443310.1103/physrevb.95.014433 ↗
44. New J. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 11301510.1088/1367-2630/aaea1c ↗
45. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 115 · 11720110.1103/physrevlett.115.117201 ↗
46. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 13 · 45110.1038/s41565-018-0093-3 ↗