journal article·2016-06-01Open access

Mesoscale studies of ionic closed membranes with polyhedral geometries

Monica Olvera de la Cruz

APL Materials· Volume 4· Issue 6

Abstract

Large crystalline molecular shells buckle spontaneously into icosahedra while multicomponent shells buckle into various polyhedra. Continuum elastic theory explains the buckling of closed shells with one elastic component into icosahedra. A generalized elastic model, on the other hand, describes the spontaneous buckling of inhomogeneous shells into regular and irregular polyhedra. By co-assembling water-insoluble anionic (−1) amphiphiles with cationic (3+) amphiphiles, we realized ionic vesicles. Results revealed that surface crystalline domains and the unusual shell shapes observed arise from the competition of ionic correlations with charge-regulation. We explain here the mechanism by which these ionic membranes generate a mechanically heterogeneous vesicle.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Northwestern University Department of Materials Science and Engineering, , Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA ; Department of Physics and Astronomy, , Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA ; and Department of Chemistry, , Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research · U.S. Department of Energy

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. · 1962 · 27 · 110.1101/SQB.1962.027.001.005 ↗
2. Nature · 1985 · 318 · 16210.1038/318162a0 ↗
3. Bioessays · 2008 · 30 · 108410.1002/bies.20830 ↗
4. J. Mol. Biol. · 2010 · 396 · 10510.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.019 ↗
5. Science · 2010 · 327 · 8110.1126/science.1179513 ↗
6. ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 1090110.1021/nn304321w ↗
7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 429210.1073/pnas.1012872108 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 38 · 100510.1103/PhysRevA.38.1005 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. E · 2003 · 68 · 05191010.1103/PhysRevE.68.051910 ↗
10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2004 · 101 · 1555610.1073/pnas.0405844101 ↗
11. 2012 · 1
12. Soft Matter · 2012 · 8 · 63610.1039/C1SM06325A ↗
13. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2007 · 79 · 64310.1103/RevModPhys.79.643 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 55 · 157710.1103/PhysRevE.55.1577 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 22810110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.228101 ↗
16. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2004 · 101 · 1508210.1073/pnas.0400837101 ↗
17. Nature · 2001 · 411 · 67210.1038/35079541 ↗
18. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1203010.1021/ja903546y ↗
19. Nature · 1980 · 283 · 6910.1038/283069a0 ↗
20. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. · 1992 · 56 · 99610.1271/bbb.56.996 ↗
21. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · S23910.1088/0953-8984/15/1/331 ↗
22. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2010 · 107 · 530010.1073/pnas.0913340107 ↗
23. J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 122 · 05490510.1063/1.1836732 ↗
24. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. · 1996 · 6 · 33410.1016/S0959-440X(96)80052 ↗
25. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2010 · 61 · 17110.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104436 ↗
26. Biophys. J. · 1998 · 74 · 38110.1016/S0006-3495(98)77795-1 ↗
27. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2008 · 4 · 81910.1021/ct700324x ↗
28. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 75010.1021/jp036508g ↗
29. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet., Ser. B: Phys. Sci. · 1970 · 73 · 169
30. Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 85 · 05050110.1103/PhysRevE.85.050501 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 86 · 02150410.1103/PhysRevE.86.021504 ↗
32. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1999 · 71 · 77910.1103/RevModPhys.71.779 ↗
33. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2013 · 117 · 507310.1021/jp401767c ↗
34. Biophys. J. · 2003 · 85 · 162410.1016/S0006-3495(03)74593-7 ↗
35. J. Bacteriol. · 1981 · 148 · 35210.1128/jb.148.1.352-360.1981 ↗