journal article·2017-04-01Open access

In situ surface potential evolution along Au/Gd:CeO2 electrode interfaces

Jiaxin Zhu, Jiaying Wang, David S. Mebane, Stephen S. Nonnenmann

APL Materials· Volume 5· Issue 4

Abstract

We present an investigation of electroactive Au/gadolinium doped ceria electrode interfaces under CO2/CO co-electrolysis environments using a combination of in situ high temperature scanning surface potential microscopy (HT-SSPM) and modified Poisson-Cahn (PC) models. Here charged surface adsorbate-oxygen vacancy interactions manifested in HT-SSPM potential profiles as small perturbations of opposite sign in reference to the applied biases. The positive deviation of surface potential on Au from applied cathodic biases is attributed to the work function difference between gold (ϕAu ∼ 5.31 eV) and graphitic carbon deposits (ϕC ∼ 5.0 eV) formed through CO disproportionation. The negative potential deviation from the applied anodic bias is attributed to negatively charged carboxylates. Results of the PC model confirmed the affinity of oxygen vacancies for the surface, thus supporting in situ experimental evidence of surface vacancy accumulation/depletion processes induced by cathodic/anodic biases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Massachusetts-Amherst 1 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, , Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA

West Virginia University 2 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, , Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 311210.1039/c3ee41272e ↗
2. J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. · 2004 · 7 · 13310.1016/0013-4686(89)87138-5 ↗
3. Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 359410.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
4. Appl. Catal., B · 2005 · 56 · 910.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 ↗
5. Acc. Chem. Res. · 2016 · 49 · 96610.1021/acs.accounts.5b00555 ↗
6. Science · 2003 · 301 · 93510.1126/science.1085721 ↗
7. Appl. Catal., A · 2004 · 258 · 27110.1016/j.apcata.2003.09.026 ↗
8. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2007 · 32 · 236710.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.003 ↗
9. Appl. Catal., A · 2002 · 224 · 20910.1016/s0926-860x(01)00783-9 ↗
10. Catal. Rev. · 1996 · 38 · 43910.1080/01614949608006464 ↗
11. Energy Fuels · 2012 · 26 · 705110.1021/ef3013757 ↗
12. Ultramicroscopy · 2008 · 108 · 143210.1016/j.ultramic.2008.05.015 ↗
13. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1769610.1021/ja2059445 ↗
14. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 94410.1038/nmat2851 ↗
15. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 1163310.1039/c4cp01054j ↗
16. Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 187610.1021/cm300574v ↗
17. Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 623310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02427 ↗
18. Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 600 · 500410.1016/j.susc.2006.04.034 ↗
19. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1536110.1039/c2cp42733h ↗
20. Nanotechnology · 2014 · 25 · 8950110.1088/0957-4484/25/8/089501 ↗
21. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2013 · 84 · 7370710.1063/1.4813317 ↗
22. ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 633010.1021/nn4023763 ↗
23. J. Mater. Res. · 2015 · 30 · 35710.1557/jmr.2014.295 ↗
24. Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 316410.1039/c5nr08172f ↗
25. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 4 · 116610.1039/c5ee02060c ↗
26. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 103 · 23110.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.025 ↗
27. ECS Trans. · 2013 · 57 · 311910.1149/05701.3119ecst ↗
28. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 871610.1021/jp200382y ↗
29. ChemCatChem · 2010 · 2 · 33610.1002/cctc.200900246 ↗
30. 2004