Formation of a ternary oxide barrier layer and its role in switching characteristic of ZnO-based conductive bridge random access memory devices
Source abstract
Abstract
The insertion of a metal layer between an active electrode and a switching layer leads to the formation of a ternary oxide at the interface. The properties of this self-formed oxide are found to be dependent on the Gibbs free energy of oxide formation of the metal (ΔGf°). We investigated the role of various ternary oxides in the switching behavior of conductive bridge random access memory (CBRAM) devices. The ternary oxide acts as a barrier layer that can limit the mobility of metal cations in the cell, promoting stable switching. However, too low (higher negative value) ΔGf° leads to severe trade-offs; the devices require high operation current and voltages to exhibit switching behavior and low memory window (on/off) ratio. We propose that choosing a metal layer having appropriate ΔGf° is crucial in achieving reliable CBRAM devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Electronics Frontiers, University of Southampton 1 , Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
Department of Physics, University of York 2 , York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies · Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Nat. Electron. · 2018 · 1 · 2210.1038/s41928-017-0006-8 ↗
2. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 36 · 04500210.1088/1361-6641/abe31a ↗
3. Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 83310.1038/nmat2023 ↗
4. Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2018 · 13 · 810.1186/s11671-017-2419-8 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 17350210.1063/5.0047036 ↗
6. 2012 · 29.8.1
7. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. · 2020 · 8 · 11010.1109/jeds.2020.2966799 ↗
8. Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 263210.1002/adma.200900375 ↗
9. Thin Solid Films · 2013 · 531 · 110.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.004 ↗
10. Small · 2017 · 13 · 110.1002/smll.201603116 ↗
11. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29 · 180843010.1002/adfm.201808430 ↗
12. Small · 2017 · 13 · 160394810.1002/smll.201603948 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2020 · 19 · 76410.1109/tnano.2020.3029588 ↗
14. Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2018 · 13 · 32710.1186/s11671-018-2743-7 ↗
15. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 1 · 1810.1021/acsaelm.8b00055 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 113 · 05350110.1063/1.5023527 ↗
17. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 124 · 1143810.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01785 ↗
18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 57 · 04FE1010.7567/jjap.57.04fe10 ↗
19. Surf. Sci. Spectra · 1996 · 4 · 24610.1116/1.1247795 ↗
20. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 03235510.1038/srep32355 ↗
21. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 21 · 139310.1039/c8cp06912c ↗
22. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 1021610.1039/c4nr02677b ↗
23. Surf. Sci. Spectra · 1998 · 5 · 17910.1116/1.1247874 ↗
24. 1999
25. Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 25400310.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254003 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 16520210.1103/physrevb.76.165202 ↗
27. Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2015 · 10 · 7510.1186/s11671-015-0801-y ↗
28. Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 38LT0210.1088/1361-6528/aa80b4 ↗
29. Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 73210.1038/ncomms1737 ↗