journal article·2014-09-01Open access

Height stabilization of GaSb/GaAs quantum dots by Al-rich capping

E. P. Smakman, M. DeJarld, M. Luengo-Kovac, A. J. Martin, V. Sih, P. M. Koenraad, J. Millunchick

APL Materials· Volume 2· Issue 9

Abstract

GaSb quantum dots (QDs) in a GaAs matrix are investigated with cross-sectional scanning tunneling microscopy (X-STM) and photoluminescence (PL). We observe that Al-rich capping materials prevent destabilization of the nanostructures during the capping stage of the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth process and thus preserves the QD height. However, the strain induced by the absence of destabilization causes many structural defects to appear around the preserved QDs. These defects originate from misfit dislocations near the GaSb/GaAs interface and extend into the capping layer as stacking faults. The lack of a red shift in the QD PL suggests that the preserved dots do not contribute to the emission spectra. We suggest that a better control over the emission wavelength and an increase of the PL intensity is attainable by growing smaller QDs with an Al-rich overgrowth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Eindhoven University of Technology 1 Department of Applied Physics, , Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands

University of Michigan 2 Department of Material Science and Engineering, , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

University of Michigan 3 Department of Physics, , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 589010.1063/1.1833560 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 25610110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.256101 ↗
3. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 06540210.1088/0022-3727/43/6/065402 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 14211610.1063/1.3701614 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 11310310.1063/1.4796036 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. E · 2002 · 65 · 02160310.1103/PhysRevE.65.021603 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 501410.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5014 ↗
8. Phys. E · 2002 · 14 · 16210.1016/S1386-9477(02)00370-3 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 17312510.1063/1.2734492 ↗
10. Microelectron. J. · 2009 · 40 · 49210.1016/j.mejo.2008.06.056 ↗
11. Semicond. Sci. Tech. · 2011 · 26 · 01402610.1088/0268-1242/26/1/014026 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 24211410.1063/1.3275758 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 07530910.1103/PhysRevB.84.075309 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 05211510.1063/1.4791678 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 569710.1063/1.1831564 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 13190210.1063/1.2058212 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 13191110.1063/1.2172742 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 16110410.1063/1.2362999 ↗
19. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 51910.1038/nmat1164 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 67 · 65610.1063/1.115193 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 26310310.1063/1.2827582 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 12210210.1063/1.4821549 ↗
23. 2008