Carbon nanotube tissue as anode current collector for flexible Li-ion batteries—Understanding the controlling parameters influencing the electrochemical performance
Source abstract
Abstract
In an attempt to upgrade the performance of lithium (Li)-ion batteries, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been suggested as a high-energy anode material. However, CNTs induce high irreversible capacity loss during the first cycle of the battery, which still poses a scientific challenge. This study explores CNT tissue as a flexible light-weight alternative to the copper (Cu) foil as an anode current collector in Li-ion batteries, employing graphite active material. The study demonstrates the impact of the graphite mass loaded on the anode performance and suggests that with the increase in the graphite mass, the irreversible capacity loss is considerably decreased. At sufficiently high graphite loadings, the performance during the first cycle becomes comparable to that of an anode utilizing the Cu current collector. This research also presents several distinct chemical pretreatments to the tissue, aiming to further decrease the irreversible capacity loss. It is suggested that this goal may be accomplished by washing the CNT with sulfuric acid prior to anode preparation, prompting better performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology 1 , Haifa 3200003, Israel
The Nancy and Stephan Grand Technion Energy Program (GTEP), Technion–Israel Institute of Technology 2 , Haifa 3200003, Israel
Funding
Israeli Ministry of Energy and Water · Prime Minister Office Fuel Choice Initiative · Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of Israel
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Proc. IEEE · 2012 · 100 · 148610.1109/jproc.2012.2190168 ↗
2. Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 172710.1039/c3nr33560g ↗
3. Nano Converg. · 2014 · 1 · 1510.1186/s40580-014-0015-5 ↗
4. J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1071210.1039/c4ta00716f ↗
5. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 375110.1002/adma.201004134 ↗
6. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 241410.1039/c3ee24260a ↗
7. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 116710.1021/ja3091438 ↗
8. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 324310.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
9. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1979 · 126 · 204710.1149/1.2128859 ↗
10. J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 1310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.020 ↗
11. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · L20810.1149/1.1837858 ↗
12. Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 58710.1021/cm901452z ↗
13. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 130710.1039/c3ee43182g ↗
14. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 2091410.1021/ja208232h ↗
15. Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 21 · 6310.1021/cm801670u ↗
16. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 336810.1002/adma.201306126 ↗
17. Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 229 · 40410.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.175 ↗
18. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 210810.1002/adfm.201202458 ↗
19. J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.084 ↗
20. Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 481010.1021/nl302254v ↗
21. J. Power Sources · 2012 · 208 · 7410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.013 ↗
22. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 6 · 1010.5229/JECST.2015.6.1.1 ↗
23. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1628010.1021/ja408421n ↗
24. J. Power Sources · 2016 · 312 · 10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.026 ↗
25. Carbon · 1999 · 37 · 16510.1016/s0008-6223(98)00290-5 ↗
26. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 453210.1039/c4nr00140k ↗
27. J. Mater. Chem. A · 2013 · 1 · 40810.1039/c2ta00140c ↗
28. ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 318710.1021/nn100740x ↗
29. Solid State Ionics · 2001 · 143 · 17310.1016/s0167-2738(01)00852-9 ↗
30. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 75110.1021/nl904286r ↗
31. Phys. Rep. · 2005 · 409 · 4710.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 ↗