Synthesis and x-ray characterization of sputtered bi-alkali antimonide photocathodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Advanced photoinjectors, which are critical to many next generation accelerators, open the door to new ways of material probing, both as injectors for free electron lasers and for ultra-fast electron diffraction. For these applications, the nonuniformity of the electric field near the cathode caused by surface roughness can be the dominant source of beam emittance. Therefore, improving the photocathode roughness while maintaining quantum efficiency is essential to the improvement of beam brightness. In this paper, we report the demonstration of a bi-alkali antimonide photocathode with an order of magnitude improved roughness by sputter deposition from a K2CsSb sputter target, using in situ and operando X-ray characterizations. We found that a surface roughness of 0.5 nm for a sputtered photocathode with a final thickness of 42 nm can be achieved while still yielding a quantum efficiency of 3.3% at 530 nm wavelength.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Radiation Monitoring Devices, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, USA
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin 12489, Germany
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
Funding
NSF | MPS | Division of Materials Research · U.S. Department of Energy · DOE | Small Business Innovative Research and Small Business Technology Transfer
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Michelato P. · 1995
2. 10.1063/1.166153710.1063/1.1661537 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nima.2005.10.11210.1016/j.nima.2005.10.112 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nima.2010.03.10410.1016/j.nima.2010.03.104 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.478939510.1063/1.4789395 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.482162510.1063/1.4821625 ↗
7. 10.1103/physrevapplied.4.02401510.1103/physrevapplied.4.024015 ↗
8. Vecchione T. · 2012
9. Smedley J. · 2015
10. 10.1016/j.sab.2006.12.00210.1016/j.sab.2006.12.002 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.173601210.1063/1.1736012 ↗
12. 10.1107/s002188980704508610.1107/s0021889807045086 ↗
13. 10.1103/physrevb.66.11510210.1103/physrevb.66.115102 ↗
14. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa688210.1088/1361-6463/aa6882 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.497436310.1063/1.4974363 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.490254410.1063/1.4902544 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.08310.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.083 ↗