journal article·2019-09-01Open access

Behavioral modeling of integrated phase-change photonic devices for neuromorphic computing applications

Santiago G.-C. Carrillo, Emanuele Gemo, Xuan Li, Nathan Youngblood, Andrew Katumba, Peter Bienstman, Wolfram Pernice, Harish Bhaskaran, C. David Wright

APL Materials· Volume 7· Issue 9

Abstract

The combination of phase-change materials and integrated photonics has led to the development of new forms of all-optical devices, including photonic memories, arithmetic and logic processors, and synaptic and neuronal mimics. Such devices can be readily fabricated into photonic integrated circuits, so potentially delivering large-scale all-optical arithmetic-logic units and neuromorphic processing chips. To facilitate in the design and optimization of such large-scale systems, and to aid in the understanding of device and system performance, fast yet accurate computer models are needed. Here, we describe the development of a behavioral modeling tool that meets such requirements, being capable of essentially instantaneous modeling of the write, erase, and readout performance of various integrated phase-change photonic devices, including those for synaptic and neuronal mimics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Photonic and Optical Devices · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, University of Exeter 1 , Exeter, United Kingdom

Department of Materials, University of Oxford 2 , Oxford, United Kingdom

Ghent University - imec 3 , Ghent, Belgium

Institute of Physics, University of Münster 4 , Münster, Germany

Funding

H2020 LEIT Information and Communication Technologies · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 137210.1002/adma.201304476 ↗
2. Nat. Photonics · 2015 · 9 · 72510.1038/nphoton.2015.182 ↗
3. Optica · 2019 · 6 · 110.1364/optica.6.000001 ↗
4. IEEE Photonics J. · 2018 · 10 · 110.1109/jphot.2017.2781710 ↗
5. Opt. Mater. Express · 2018 · 8 · 155110.1364/ome.8.001551 ↗
6. Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 125610.1038/s41467-017-01506-3 ↗
7. Sci. Adv. · 2019 · 5 · eaau575910.1126/sciadv.aau5759 ↗
8. Sci. Adv. · 2017 · 3 · e170016010.1126/sciadv.1700160 ↗
9. Nature · 2019 · 569 · 20810.1038/s41586-019-1157-8 ↗
10. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1298010.1038/s41598-018-31365-x ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 11 · 01406310.1103/physrevapplied.11.014063 ↗
12. 2001
13. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 431410.1038/ncomms5314 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 50410.1063/1.1633984 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 06311310.1063/1.2475606 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 08490110.1063/1.2978334 ↗
17. Electron. Lett. · 2000 · 36 · 32110.1049/el:20000340 ↗
18. J. Lightwave Technol. · 1997 · 15 · 99810.1109/50.588673 ↗
19. Appl. Therm. Eng. · 2018 · 129 · 155110.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.149 ↗
20. 1939
21. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 10 · 90010.1109/tnano.2010.2089638 ↗
22. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2009 · 12 · F1710.1149/1.3129137 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 376710.1109/ted.2013.2282637 ↗
24. Opt. Mater. Express · 2018 · 8 · 245510.1364/ome.8.002455 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07370910.1063/1.3093684 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 12352610.1063/1.4770359 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 15190410.1063/1.2359354 ↗