journal article·2014-03-01Open access

Intrinsic nature of visible-light absorption in amorphous semiconducting oxides

Youngho Kang, Hochul Song, Ho-Hyun Nahm, Sang Ho Jeon, Youngmi Cho, Seungwu Han

APL Materials· Volume 2· Issue 3

Abstract

To enlighten microscopic origin of visible-light absorption in transparent amorphous semiconducting oxides, the intrinsic optical property of amorphous InGaZnO4 is investigated by considering dipole transitions within the quasiparticle band structure. In comparison with the crystalline InGaZnO4 with the optical gap of 3.6 eV, the amorphous InGaZnO4 has two distinct features developed in the band structure that contribute to significant visible-light absorption. First, the conduction bands are down-shifted by 0.55 eV mainly due to the undercoordinated In atoms, reducing the optical gap between extended states to 2.8 eV. Second, tail states formed by localized oxygen p orbitals are distributed over ∼0.5 eV near the valence edge, which give rise to substantial subgap absorption. The fundamental understanding on the optical property of amorphous semiconducting oxides based on underlying electronic structure will pave the way for resolving instability issues in recent display devices incorporating the semiconducting oxides.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · ZnO doping and properties · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Seoul National University 1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, , Seoul 151-755, South Korea

Institute for Basic Science (IBS) 2 Center for Correlated Electron Systems, , Seoul 151-747, South Korea

Seoul National University 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, , Seoul 151-747, South Korea

CAE Team 4 , Samsung Display Co., Ltd, 95 Samsung 2-ro, Giheung-gu, Youngin-City, Gyeonggi-Do 446-711, South Korea

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 11 · 04430510.1088/1468-6996/11/4/044305 ↗
2. Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 145910.1038/srep01459 ↗
3. Nature (London) · 2004 · 432 · 48810.1038/nature03090 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 11212310.1063/1.2353811 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 01350310.1063/1.1843286 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 15210410.1063/1.4802093 ↗
7. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 316910.1002/adfm.200700604 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 11521510.1103/PhysRevB.77.115215 ↗
9. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 30110.1038/nmat3256 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 17350610.1063/1.3503971 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 19350410.1063/1.2806934 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 02210810.1063/1.3464964 ↗
13. SID Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. · 2008 · 39 · 121510.1889/1.3069354 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 11520510.1103/PhysRevB.84.115205 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 16370410.1063/1.4826895 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
20. J. Disp. Technol. · 2009 · 5 · 27310.1109/JDT.2009.2021582 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 24640310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246403 ↗
22. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4868175 for detailed information.10.1063/1.4868175 ↗
23. Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 511910.1021/cm9020113 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 23520410.1103/PhysRevB.86.235204 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 11211210.1063/1.3103323 ↗
26. J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2008 · 354 · 279610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.10.071 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 12530710.1103/PhysRevB.85.125307 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 492710.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927 ↗
29. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 04370510.1063/1.3553851 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 19640410.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196404 ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 18370610.1063/1.4803706 ↗
32. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 19211510.1063/1.3262962 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 03371310.1063/1.4744983 ↗
34. The Impact of Orbital Hybridization on the Electronic Structure of Crystalline InGaZnO: A New Perspective on the Compositional Dependence
35. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 09210710.1063/1.4748884 ↗
36. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2011 · 32 · 125110.1109/LED.2011.2160836 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 04511210.1103/PhysRevB.73.045112 ↗
38. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 02740110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.027401 ↗
39. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2009 · 206 · 86010.1002/pssa.200881303 ↗
40. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 23510210.1103/PhysRevB.75.235102 ↗
41. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 08110110.1103/PhysRevB.83.081101 ↗
42. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2012 · 249 · 127710.1002/pssb.201147557 ↗
43. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 10350910.1063/1.3564882 ↗