Indium as a surfactant: Effects on growth morphology and background impurity in GaN films grown by ammonia-assisted molecular beam epitaxy
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on the improvement of the surface morphology of c-plane GaN films grown at high growth rates (∼1 µm/h) using ammonia molecular beam epitaxy through a series of growth optimizations as well as the introduction of indium as a surfactant. The indium surfactant was expected to help with the adatom mobility and, thus, provide smoother growth surfaces. Through a combination of varying V/III ratios, In flux, and growth temperatures, an optimal condition for surface morphology, characterized by atomic force microscopy, was achieved. At higher Ga fluxes for fast growth rates (∼1 µm/h and beam equivalent pressures of ∼5 × 10−7 Torr), higher ammonia flows were necessary to preserve the surface morphology. In addition, indium was an effective surfactant—reducing the roughness and improving the overall surface morphology. However, excessive indium causes the surface morphology to degrade, potentially due to the enhancement of the Ga desorption from the surface as a result of the reaction of indium with ammonia for high indium fluxes. The indium surfactant also resulted in a reduction of background Si impurity concentrations in the film. These effects allow for the growth of thick drift layers with low background dopant concentrations for vertical GaN power devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Department, University of California , Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
Funding
Simons Foundation · Advanced Research Projects Agency—Energy · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 20110310.1063/1.5143785 ↗
2. ACS Photonics · 2020 · 7 · 55410.1021/acsphotonics.9b00600 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2015 · 62 · 41410.1109/ted.2014.2360861 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2001 · 48 · 58610.1109/16.906455 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 126 · 24570510.1063/1.5123394 ↗
6. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 36 · 07500110.1088/1361-6641/abfdfc ↗
7. APL Mater. · 2021 · 9 · 08111810.1063/5.0060154 ↗
8. Proc. SPIE · 2018 · 10754 · 107540210.1117/12.2322005 ↗
9. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. · 2020 · 8 · 7410.1109/jeds.2020.2963902 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2022 · 120 · 06210410.1063/5.0079359 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 12352510.1063/1.3042230 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 127 · 01570110.1063/1.5129248 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · R847310.1103/physrevb.60.r8473 ↗
14. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2001 · 188 · 77510.1002/1521-396x(200112)188:2<775::aid-pssa775>3.0.co;2-s ↗
15. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 09511910.1063/5.0066652 ↗
16. Crystals · 2021 · 11 · 100610.3390/cryst11081006 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 11570110.1063/5.0020263 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 22210310.1063/1.4922216 ↗
19. 2019
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 35010.1063/1.120733 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 05610110.1103/physrevlett.90.056101 ↗
22. Superlattices Microstruct. · 2019 · 130 · 39610.1016/j.spmi.2019.05.012 ↗
23. J. Power Sources · 2020 · 450 · 22757810.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227578 ↗
24. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 21 · 01580310.1088/0953-8984/21/1/015803 ↗
25. J. Electron. Mater. · 2014 · 43 · 456010.1007/s11664-014-3383-z ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 200810.1063/1.1452785 ↗
27. Phys. Status Solidi C · 2003 · 0 · 165110.1002/pssc.200303132 ↗
28. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 07350510.1063/1.2180532 ↗