journal article·2021-02-01Open access

Advantages and limitation of Mn doped PIN–PMN–PT single crystals in pyroelectric detectors

N. Neumann, A. Kaiser, D. Mutschall

APL Materials· Volume 9· Issue 2

Abstract

The outstanding pyroelectric coefficient p of Mn:PIN–PMN–PT makes it an interesting material for application in pyroelectric infrared detectors. In comparison to the standard material lithium tantalate (LT), the pyroelectric coefficient is higher by a factor of 4. On the other hand, the dielectric permittivity εp is about one order of magnitude higher compared to LT. Due to the higher permittivity, the resulting Figures of Merit (FOM) show the highest performance advantages for Mn:PIN–PMN–PT in the lower frequency range between 1 Hz and 10 Hz. The FOM FR of 278 · 10−12 m/V exceeds by half an order of magnitude the value of LT of 54 · 10−12 m/V. Outstanding specific detectivities around D* ≈ 1.0 · 109 cm√Hz/W at low frequencies even at a relatively low chip size were achieved. The detector fabrication needs adaption of the processes to avoid depolarization due to high temperature impact or mechanical stress.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

InfraTec GmbH , Gostritzer Strasse 61-63, 01217 Dresden, Germany

Funding

Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Ferroelectrics · 1981 · 33 · 19310.1080/00150198108008086 ↗
2. Phys. Today · 2005 · 58 · 3110.1063/1.2062916 ↗
3. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1986 · 49 · 133510.1088/0034-4885/49/12/002 ↗
4. IEEE Sens. J. · 2001 · 1 · 19110.1109/jsen.2001.954832 ↗
5. Phys. Scr. · 2007 · 610.1088/0031-8949/2007/t129/002 ↗
6. Integr. Ferroelectr. · 1997 · 17 · 36910.1080/10584589708013011 ↗
7. 12 2012
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 1973 · 44 · 92910.1063/1.1662294 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 08410410.1063/1.2106014 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 19290310.1063/1.3263139 ↗
11. 2011
12. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control · 2010 · 57 · 215410.1109/TUFFC.2010.1672 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control · 2012 · 59 · 198310.1109/tuffc.2012.2417 ↗
14. 2011
15. Ferroelectrics · 1976 · 10 · 8310.1080/00150197608241956 ↗
16. Phys. Status Solidi A · 1980 · 61 · 7310.1002/pssa.2210610106 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 180410.1063/1.365983 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 25290710.1063/1.2942378 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 16290610.1063/1.2363149 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 1982 · 53 · 898010.1063/1.330455 ↗
21. J. Cryst. Growth · 2011 · 318 · 86510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.10.187 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 24290510.1063/1.4729749 ↗
23. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. · 2020 · 31 · 1231710.1007/s10854-020-03777-x ↗
24. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. · 2015 · 26 · 931610.1007/s10854-015-3023-2 ↗
25. 1987
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1976 · 29 · 39310.1063/1.89116 ↗
27. Infrared Phys. · 1993 · 34 · 48710.1016/0020-0891(93)90083-j ↗