journal article·2022-09-01Open access

Effect of post-metallization anneal on (100) Ga2O3/Ti–Au ohmic contact performance and interfacial degradation

Ming-Hsun Lee, Ta-Shun Chou, Saud Bin Anooz, Zbigniew Galazka, Andreas Popp, Rebecca L. Peterson

APL Materials· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

Here, we investigate the effect of post-metallization anneal temperature on Ti/Au ohmic contact performance for (100)-oriented Ga2O3. A low contact resistance of ∼2.49 × 10−5 Ω·cm2 is achieved at an optimal anneal temperature of ∼420 °C for (100) Ga2O3. This is lower than the widely-used temperature of 470 °C for (010)-oriented Ga2O3. However, drastic degradation of the (100)-oriented contact resistance to ∼1.36 × 10−3 Ω·cm2 is observed when the anneal temperature was increased to 520 °C. Microscopy at the degraded ohmic contact revealed that the reacted Ti–TiOx interfacial layer has greatly expanded to 25–30 nm thickness and GaAu2 inclusions have formed between (310)-Ga2O3 planes and the Ti–TiOx layer. This degraded interface, which corresponds to the deterioration of ohmic contact properties, likely results from excess in-diffusion of Au and out-diffusion of Ga, concurrent with the expansion of the Ti–TiOx layer. These results demonstrate the critical influence of Ga2O3 anisotropy on the optimal post-metallization anneal temperature. Moreover, the observed Ti/Au contact degradation occurs for relatively moderate anneal conditions (520 °C for 1 min in N2), pointing to the urgent necessity of developing alternative metallization schemes for gallium oxide, including the use of Au-free electrodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan 1 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Leibniz-Institut für Kristallzüchtung (IKZ) 2 , Max-Born-Str. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan 3 , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research · Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2018 · 5 · 01130110.1063/1.5006941 ↗
2. J. Cryst. Growth · 2014 · 404 · 18410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.07.021 ↗
3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 850610.1143/jjap.47.8506 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 131 · 03110310.1063/5.0076962 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 114 · 25060110.1063/1.5109678 ↗
6. APL Mater. · 2020 · 8 · 02111010.1063/1.5132752 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 18210610.1063/5.0005403 ↗
8. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 6 · Q304010.1149/2.0081702jss ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 117 · 14210210.1063/5.0023778 ↗
10. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2016 · 37 · 90210.1109/led.2016.2568139 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Express · 2015 · 8 · 01550310.7567/apex.8.015503 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Express · 2014 · 7 · 09550110.7567/apex.7.095501 ↗
13. APL Mater. · 2020 · 8 · 01110710.1063/1.5135772 ↗
14. APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 02251510.1063/1.5054943 ↗
15. APL Mater. · 2020 · 8 · 09110510.1063/5.0019915 ↗
16. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 323 · 19310.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.051 ↗
17. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 11532310.1063/5.0069243 ↗
18. ACS Nano · 2022 · 16 · 1198810.1021/acsnano.2c01957 ↗
19. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2021 · 39 · 03320210.1116/6.0000877 ↗
20. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2019 · 40 · 33710.1109/led.2019.2891304 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 20210210.1063/1.4983610 ↗
22. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 2017 · 35 · 03D11310.1116/1.4980042 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 08650210.7567/apex.6.086502 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Express · 2021 · 14 · 07650210.35848/1882-0786/ac07ef ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 01350410.1063/1.3674287 ↗
26. J. Mater. Res. · 2021 · 36 · 477110.1557/s43578-021-00334-y ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 12351110.1063/1.4821858 ↗
28. J. Electron. Mater. · 2017 · 46 · 205310.1007/s11664-016-5121-1 ↗
29. ECS Trans. · 2019 · 92 · 7110.1149/09207.0071ecst ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Express · 2019 · 12 · 06100710.7567/1882-0786/ab206c ↗
31. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 6 · Q300710.1149/2.0021702jss ↗
32. J. Cryst. Growth · 2020 · 529 · 12529710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125297 ↗
33. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. · 2021 · 67 · 10051110.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2020.100511 ↗
34. 2020
35. 2020
36. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 22530810.1063/1.4971957 ↗
37. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 16570110.1063/1.4993748 ↗
38. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2020 · 14 · 200014510.1002/pssr.202000145 ↗
39. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 54 · 03400310.1088/1361-6463/abb6aa ↗
40. 2015
41. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 04627710.1021/acsami.0c10598 ↗
42. APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 02252410.1063/1.5054624 ↗
43. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 234010.1063/1.123844 ↗
44. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 1999 · 17 · 510.1116/1.591135 ↗
45. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 20210410.1063/1.4983814 ↗
46. APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 02251010.1063/1.5054826 ↗