journal article·2015-04-01Open access

Large magnetic anisotropy in strained Fe/Co multilayers on AuCu and the effect of carbon doping

G. Giannopoulos, R. Salikhov, B. Zingsem, A. Markou, I. Panagiotopoulos, V. Psycharis, M. Farle, D. Niarchos

APL Materials· Volume 3· Issue 4

Abstract

A tetragonally distorted FeCo structure is obtained in Fe/Co multilayers epitaxially grown on Au50Cu50 buffer using MgO single crystal substrates as a result of the lattice mismatch between the buffer and the FeCo ferromagnetic layer. The presence of large magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE) of the order of 1 MJ/m3 has been confirmed by ferromagnetic resonance. Furthermore, the effect of carbon (C) doping to maintain the tetragonal distortion throughout the thickness of 3 nm FeCo has been investigated. Our study shows that FeCo alloys maintain large magnetic moment and possess high MAE properties that are required for designing permanent magnets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

INN 1 , NCSR Demokritos, Athens 15310, Greece

Universität Duisburg-Essen 2 Fakultät für Physik and Center for Nanointegration (CeNIDE), , 47057 Duisburg, Germany

University of Ioannina 3 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, , Ioannina, Greece

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 467110.1109/TMAG.2011. 2166975 ↗
2. Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 821-84210.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
3. 1997
4. Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams · 1984 · 5 · 25010.1007/BF02868548 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 77 · 105510.1063/1.358965 ↗
6. J. Phys: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · S451-S45610.1088/0953-8984/15/5/302 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 02720310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.027203 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 03720510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.037205 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 03720510.1103/PhysRevLett.100.037205 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07C30310.1063/1.3067854 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 09A30610.1063/1.3334200 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 545710.1063/1.373371 ↗
13. APL Mater. · 2014 · 2 · 04610710.1063/1.4870759 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 21390110.1063/1.4901595 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 14440310.1103/PhysRevB.89.144403 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 17720710.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177207 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 319210.1103/PhysRevB.34.3192 ↗
18. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 239 · 47910.1016/S0304-8853(01)00661-8 ↗
19. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1998 · 61 · 75510.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 180405(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.84.180405 ↗
21. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1998 · 183 · 1910.1016/S0304-8853(97)01064-0 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 60 · 276910.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2769 ↗
23. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1996 · 59 · 140910.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002 ↗
24. Adv. Phys. · 1993 · 42 · 52310.1080/00018739300101524 ↗