journal article·2017-11-01Open access

Interrelated chemical-microstructural-nanomechanical variations in the structural units of the cuttlebone of Sepia officinalis

L. North, D. Labonte, M. L. Oyen, M. P. Coleman, H. B. Caliskan, R. E. Johnston

APL Materials· Volume 5· Issue 11

Abstract

“Cuttlebone,” the internalized shell found in all members of the cephalopod family Sepiidae, is a sophisticated buoyancy device combining high porosity with considerable strength. Using a complementary suite of characterization tools, we identified significant structural, chemical, and mechanical variations across the different structural units of the cuttlebone: the dorsal shield consists of two stiff and hard layers with prismatic mineral organization which encapsulate a more ductile and compliant layer with a lamellar structure, enriched with organic matter. A similar organization is found in the chambers, which are separated by septa, and supported by meandering plates (“pillars”). Like the dorsal shield, septa contain two layers with lamellar and prismatic organization, respectively, which differ significantly in their mechanical properties: layers with prismatic organization are a factor of three stiffer and up to a factor of ten harder than those with lamellar organization. The combination of stiff and hard, and compliant and ductile components may serve to reduce the risk of catastrophic failure, and reflect the role of organic matter for the growth process of the cuttlebone. Mechanically “weaker” units may function as sacrificial structures, ensuring a stepwise failure of the individual chambers in cases of overloading, allowing the animals to retain near-neutral buoyancy even with partially damaged cuttlebones. Our findings have implications for our understanding of the structure-property-function relationship of cuttlebone, and may help to identify novel bioinspired design strategies for light-weight yet high-strength foams.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cephalopods and Marine Biology · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Research Centre, College of Engineering, Swansea University 1 , Swansea SA1 8EN, United Kingdom

Cambridge University Engineering Department 2 , Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom

Funding

Denman Baynes Senior Research Fellowship · EC | Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion | European Social Fund · DOD | United States Army | USACE | Engineer Research and Development Center · RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. On the architecture and function of cuttlefish bone10.1007/bf00555001 ↗
2. Shell implosion depth and implosion morphologies in three species of Sepia (Cephalopoda) from the Mediterranean Sea10.1017/s0025315400047366 ↗
3. Morphometrics of the shell of three Sepia species (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): Intra-and interspecific variation
4. Cuttlebone morphology limits habitat depth in eleven species of Sepia (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae)10.2307/1542696 ↗
5. Scaffolds for bone restoration from cuttlefish10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.018 ↗
6. Template mineralization of ordered macroporous chitin−silica composites using a cuttlebone-derived organic matrix10.1021/cm0004376 ↗
7. Preparation of highly porous hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone10.1007/s10856-008-3674-0 ↗
8. PCL-coated hydroxyapatite scaffold derived from cuttlefish bone: Morphology, mechanical properties and bioactivity10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.036 ↗
9. Cuttlefish bone scaffold for tissue engineering: A novel hydrothermal transformation, chemical-physical, and biological characterization10.5301/jabfm.2012.9257 ↗
10. Mechanical performance and in vivo tests of an acrylic bone cement filled with bioactive Sepia officinalis cuttlebone10.1163/156856209x410265 ↗
11. New chamber formation in the cuttlefish Sepia esculenta Hoyle
12. The mechanical design of the cuttlebone and its bathymetric implications
13. 1893
14. Comparative study of the structure, development and morphological relationships of chambered cephalopod shells
15. The cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Sepiidae, Cephalopoda) constructs cuttlebone from a liquid-crystal precursor10.1038/srep11513 ↗
16. Composite design through biomimetic inspirations
17. Complementary microstructural and chemical analyses of Sepia officinalis endoskeleton10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.040 ↗
18. First proteomic analyses of the dorsal and ventral parts of the Sepia officinalis cuttlebone10.1016/j.jprot.2016.08.015 ↗
19. Characterization of cuttlebone for a biomimetic design of cellular structures10.1007/s10409-009-0310-2 ↗
20. Bioinspired lightweight cellular materials—Understanding effects of natural variation on mechanical properties10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.031 ↗
21. Cuttlebone-like V2O5 nanofibre scaffolds—Advances in structuring cellular solids10.1038/srep42951 ↗
22. The Mollusca and Radiata
23. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/jmr.1992.1564 ↗
24. Siphonal zone structure in the cuttlebone of Sepia officinalis10.1007/s13358-015-0085-y ↗
25. Hindered crack propagation in materials with periodically varying Young’s modulus—Lessons from biological materials10.1002/adma.200602394 ↗
26. Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale10.1126/science.1112255 ↗
27. The toughening mechanism of nacre and structural materials inspired by nacre10.1088/1468-6996/12/6/064710 ↗
28. Bioinspired design criteria for damage-resistant materials with periodically varying microstructure10.1002/adfm.201100443 ↗
29. On the relationship between indentation hardness and modulus, and the damage resistance of biological materials10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.034 ↗
30. Formation and morphogenesis of a cuttlebone’s aragonite biomineral structures for the common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) on the nanoscale: Revisited10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.028 ↗
31. 2001 · 510