Large voltage control of magnetic anisotropy in CoFeB/MgO/OX structures at room temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
Voltage control of magnetic anisotropy (VCMA) provides an energy-efficient approach to manipulate spintronic devices. Currently, VCMA only shows a weak effect in magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) composed of CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB that are the core structure of spintronic memories and logic devices. Multiple approaches have been proposed and studied by researchers to increase the VCMA effect. Here, we demonstrate a large VCMA effect in the CoFeB/MgO/SiO2 double-oxide structure, which can be potentially modified to be compatible with the MTJ cell. The VCMA coefficient as high as 174 fJ/Vm is achieved in this structure at room temperature, with its magnitude comparable to the reported ion-driven VCMA with a high ion-conductive oxide at an elevated temperature. Theoretical analysis indicates that the large VCMA is a magnetoionic effect, which is dominated by ion migration and can be explained by a nanograin cluster model. This double-oxide structure is promising to be extended to an MTJ structure to reduce switching energy in spintronic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University 1 , Beijing 100084, China
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University 2 , Stanford, California 94305, USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent progress in spintronics and devices
2. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 07400310.1088/0022-3727/46/7/074003 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 22250410.1063/1.3443658 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 02250610.1063/1.3279157 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240310.1063/1.4753816 ↗
6. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 3910.1038/nmat3172 ↗
7. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 87 · 3310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.02.002 ↗
8. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 168910.1063/1.1310166 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 02441310.1103/physrevb.66.024413 ↗
11. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 24010.1038/nmat3522 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2018 · 9 · 06402710.1103/physrevapplied.9.064027 ↗
13. Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 17410.1038/nmat4134 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 26720210.1103/physrevlett.113.267202 ↗
15. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 4 · 170046110.1002/aelm.201700461 ↗
16. 2009 · 132902
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 02040710.1103/physrevb.92.020407 ↗
18. Nat. Electron. · 2018 · 1 · 50810.1038/s41928-018-0131-z ↗
19. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1226410.1038/ncomms12264 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. A · 2009 · 94 · 51510.1007/s00339-008-4975-3 ↗
21. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 1310.1038/nnano.2012.240 ↗
22. Oxid. Met. · 1981 · 16 · 35510.1007/bf00611349 ↗