journal article·2019-10-01Open access

Large voltage control of magnetic anisotropy in CoFeB/MgO/OX structures at room temperature

Fen Xue, Noriyuki Sato, Chong Bi, Jun Hu, Jinliang He, Shan X. Wang

APL Materials· Volume 7· Issue 10

Abstract

Voltage control of magnetic anisotropy (VCMA) provides an energy-efficient approach to manipulate spintronic devices. Currently, VCMA only shows a weak effect in magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) composed of CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB that are the core structure of spintronic memories and logic devices. Multiple approaches have been proposed and studied by researchers to increase the VCMA effect. Here, we demonstrate a large VCMA effect in the CoFeB/MgO/SiO2 double-oxide structure, which can be potentially modified to be compatible with the MTJ cell. The VCMA coefficient as high as 174 fJ/Vm is achieved in this structure at room temperature, with its magnitude comparable to the reported ion-driven VCMA with a high ion-conductive oxide at an elevated temperature. Theoretical analysis indicates that the large VCMA is a magnetoionic effect, which is dominated by ion migration and can be explained by a nanograin cluster model. This double-oxide structure is promising to be extended to an MTJ structure to reduce switching energy in spintronic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University 1 , Beijing 100084, China

Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University 2 , Stanford, California 94305, USA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Recent progress in spintronics and devices
2. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 07400310.1088/0022-3727/46/7/074003 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 22250410.1063/1.3443658 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 02250610.1063/1.3279157 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240310.1063/1.4753816 ↗
6. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 3910.1038/nmat3172 ↗
7. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 87 · 3310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.02.002 ↗
8. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 168910.1063/1.1310166 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 02441310.1103/physrevb.66.024413 ↗
11. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 24010.1038/nmat3522 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2018 · 9 · 06402710.1103/physrevapplied.9.064027 ↗
13. Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 17410.1038/nmat4134 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 26720210.1103/physrevlett.113.267202 ↗
15. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 4 · 170046110.1002/aelm.201700461 ↗
16. 2009 · 132902
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 02040710.1103/physrevb.92.020407 ↗
18. Nat. Electron. · 2018 · 1 · 50810.1038/s41928-018-0131-z ↗
19. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1226410.1038/ncomms12264 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. A · 2009 · 94 · 51510.1007/s00339-008-4975-3 ↗
21. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 1310.1038/nnano.2012.240 ↗
22. Oxid. Met. · 1981 · 16 · 35510.1007/bf00611349 ↗