journal article·2021-09-01

Method of Metal Button Defect Detection Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Sparse Representation

Xiang Li, Leilei Xu, Xunhua Liu, Shaoyuan Sun

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 8· Issue 1_suppl
Publisher page

Abstract

We studied the algorithms of button defect detection, while metal button defect detection is seldom explored in the literature. In this paper, we propose to effectively improve the detecting speed, accuracy, and robustness of the model. We propose a new method of cascading Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) and Sparse Representation Classification (SRC). This method transforms the defect detection problem into a pattern classification problem. First, we preprocess the input button images via eliminating reflection, edges extraction, and dimensionality reduction. ELM has a faster learning speed and better detecting accuracy than the single layer perceptron and support layer machine. ELM was utilized to estimate the probability of the defective buttons, with parameters obtained from the five-fold cross-validation method. SRC was used to reclassify those button images with high noise. Our method improved the detection accuracy, as well as guaranteed the detecting speed. We showed state-of-the-art performance in comparison to other approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning and ELM · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Face and Expression Recognition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Donghua University

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang H. · 2017
2. 10.1109/TCYB.2013.226701510.1109/TCYB.2013.2267015 ↗
3. Chen H. · 2015
4. Zhou T. · 2016
5. 10.1023/A:100971592355510.1023/A:1009715923555 ↗
6. Li S. · Technology Innovation and Application · 2018 · 8 · 2
7. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00294-710.1016/S0924-0136(02)00294-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.12610.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
9. Huang G. · Neural Networks · 2004 · 2 · 985
10. 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.7910.1109/TPAMI.2008.79 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.neunet.2016.06.00110.1016/j.neunet.2016.06.001 ↗
12. Wang Y. · 2013
13. Xiao X. · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2018 · 30 · 1
14. 10.1016/j.neucom.2010.02.01910.1016/j.neucom.2010.02.019 ↗
15. Huang G.-B. · Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Control, Autom. Robot. · 2004 · 2 · 1029
16. 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.01.07210.1016/j.neucom.2014.01.072 ↗
17. Zheng P. · Signal Processing · 2013 · 29 · 888
18. 10.1109/TIT.2005.86208310.1109/TIT.2005.862083 ↗
19. 10.3724/SP.J.1016.2011.0042510.3724/SP.J.1016.2011.00425 ↗
20. Zagoruyko S., Komodakis N. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2015, 4353–4361.