Electrical and chemical analysis of Ti/Au contacts toβ-Ga2O3
Source abstract
Abstract
Chemical and electrical measurements of Ti/(010) β-Ga2O3 and Ti/(001) β-Ga2O3 interfaces were conducted as a function of annealing temperature using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), current density–voltage (J–V), and capacitance–voltage (C–V) measurements. XPS revealed partial Ti oxidation at both interfaces in the as-deposited condition, with more Ti oxidation on the (001) β-Ga2O3 epilayer surface than the (010) β-Ga2O3 substrate surface. The amount of oxidized Ti increased with annealing temperature. The Schottky barrier heights for as-deposited (unannealed) Au/Ti/(010) β-Ga2O3 and Au/Ti/(001) β-Ga2O3 contacts as determined from J–V and C–V measurements were between 0.64 and 0.83 eV. Shifts in XPS core level peaks for Ti/(010) β-Ga2O3 suggest that the Schottky barrier height decreases with temperature up to 350 °C for 10-min anneals and increases for 10-min anneals ≥460 °C. Taken together, the results suggest a strong dependence of Ti reactivity on the β-Ga2O3 surface, which can affect the electrical performance and stability of Ti/β-Ga2O3 ohmic contacts at elevated temperatures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
Air Force Research Laboratory Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, WPAFB, Dayton, Ohio 45433, USA
Air Force Research Laboratory Sensors Directorate, WPAFB, Dayton, Ohio 45433, USA
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/8/08501410.1088/1367-2630/13/8/085014 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.367428710.1063/1.3674287 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6641/ab55fe10.1088/1361-6641/ab55fe ↗
4. 10.1007/s11664-020-07985-310.1007/s11664-020-07985-3 ↗
5. 10.1109/ted.2019.290690610.1109/ted.2019.2906906 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0081702jss10.1149/2.0081702jss ↗
7. 10.7567/apex.8.01550310.7567/apex.8.015503 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.02.00810.1016/j.mssp.2016.02.008 ↗
9. 10.1080/21663831.2018.144397810.1080/21663831.2018.1443978 ↗
10. 10.1149/08007.0191ecst10.1149/08007.0191ecst ↗
11. 10.7567/apex.11.03110110.7567/apex.11.031101 ↗
12. 10.7567/apex.9.06110210.7567/apex.9.061102 ↗
13. 10.1116/6.000008610.1116/6.0000086 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.499136310.1063/1.4991363 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.504721410.1063/1.5047214 ↗
16. 10.1149/09207.0071ecst10.1149/09207.0071ecst ↗
17. 10.1116/1.498004210.1116/1.4980042 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11664-016-5121-110.1007/s11664-016-5121-1 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.0321907jss10.1149/2.0321907jss ↗
20. 10.1063/1.505462410.1063/1.5054624 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0301710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03017 ↗
22. 10.1109/ted.2021.306068910.1109/ted.2021.3060689 ↗
23. L. A. M. Lyle, L. Jiang, K. K. Das, and L. M. Porter, inGallium Oxide: Technology, Devices and Applications, edited by S. J. Pearton, F. Ren, and M. A. Mastro (Elsevier, 2019), p. 231.10.1016/B978-0-12-814521-0.00011-7 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.498361010.1063/1.4983610 ↗
25. 10.1116/6.000087710.1116/6.0000877 ↗
26. 10.1103/physrevb.102.03530410.1103/physrevb.102.035304 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.505409110.1063/1.5054091 ↗
28. 10.1103/physrevx.8.02100410.1103/physrevx.8.021004 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0557610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05576 ↗
30. 10.1103/physrevb.96.20514310.1103/physrevb.96.205143 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.05110.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.051 ↗
32. 10.1109/ted.2019.295150210.1109/ted.2019.2951502 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.496793110.1063/1.4967931 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.500694110.1063/1.5006941 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.9735910.1063/1.97359 ↗
36. Sze S. M. · Phys. Semicond. Devices · 2007 · 763 · 763