journal article·2025-09-01Open access

Machine learning prediction of thermodynamic stability and electronic properties of 2D layered conductive metal–organic frameworks

Zeyu Zhang, Yuliang Shi, Farnaz A. Shakib

APL Materials· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Two-dimensional layered electrically conductive metal–organic frameworks (EC MOFs) have emerged as promising materials for electronic and energy applications due to their tunable electronic properties and structural versatility. Here, we employ machine learning (ML) models to predict the thermodynamic stability and electronic properties of EC MOFs, significantly reducing the dependence on costly ab initio calculations. We construct different feature sets by integrating compositional features from generic statistical reduction methods along with structural descriptors curated from the EC-MOF database (termed GD, M-GD, and A-GD features). Various ML models, including linear, tree-based, and ensemble learning approaches, are benchmarked for predicting formation energies of EC MOFs, as one measure of synthesizability, as well as predicting their electrically conductive nature. The density functional theory data pool spans the 536 monolayer systems in the EC-MOF database, divided into 90% training and 10% test sets. Our results demonstrate that ML models treated by proper feature engineering can achieve very high accuracy for formation energy prediction, with the coefficient of determination, R2, being as high as 0.96. Via proper feature engineering, we also report up to 92% accuracy in predicting the metallicity of EC MOFs and 82% in bandgap classification using the extra tree classifier. The trained ML models are further applied to a new class of EC MOFs, which are neither part of the training nor members of the EC-MOF database, showcasing their predictive power and transferability. This work establishes the foundations of a data-driven framework for accelerating the discovery of novel EC MOFs in future research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology , Newark, New Jersey 07102,

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. New porous crystals of extended metal-catecholates10.1021/cm301194a ↗
2. High electrical conductivity in Ni3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2, a semiconducting metal–organic graphene analogue10.1021/ja502765n ↗
3. Conductive two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks as multifunctional materials10.1039/c8cc02871k ↗
4. Electrically conductive metal–organic frameworks10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00766 ↗
5. Metal-to-semiconductor transition in two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks: An ab initio dynamics perspective10.1021/acsami.1c04636 ↗
6. Tuning electronic properties of conductive 2D layered metal–organic frameworks via host–guest interactions: Dioxygen as an electroactive chemical stimuli10.1063/5.0049317 ↗
7. Gauging van der Waals interactions in aqueous solutions of 2D MOFS: When water likes organic linkers more than open-metal sites10.1039/d0cp05923d ↗
8. A highly conductive MOF of graphene analogue Ni3(HITP)2 as a sulfur host for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/smll.201902605 ↗
9. Conductive MOF electrodes for stable supercapacitors with high areal capacitance10.1038/nmat4766 ↗
10. Recent advances in two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks as an exotic candidate for the evaluation of redox-active sites in energy storage devices10.1016/j.est.2023.107142 ↗
11. Cu3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2: An electrically conductive 2D metal–organic framework for chemiresistive sensing10.1002/anie.201411854 ↗
12. Electrically-transduced chemical sensors based on two-dimensional nanomaterials10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00311 ↗
13. Computation-ready, experimental metal–organic frameworks: A tool to enable high-throughput screening of nanoporous crystals10.1021/cm502594j ↗
14. Data-driven design of metal–organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO2 capture10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
15. In silico high-throughput design and prediction of structural and electronic properties of low-dimensional metal–organic frameworks10.1021/acsami.2c22665 ↗
16. Applications of machine learning in metal-organic frameworks10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213487 ↗
17. Crystalline coordination framework endowed with dynamic gate-opening behaviour by being downsized to a thin film10.1038/nchem.2469 ↗
18. Fabrication and structural characterization of an ultrathin film of a two-dimensional-layered metal–organic framework, {Fe(py)2[Ni(CN)4]} (py = pyridine)10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01113 ↗
19. A Chinese pane-like 2D metal-organic framework showing magnetic relaxation and luminescence dual-functions10.1038/s41598-017-11006-5 ↗
20. Building blocks for two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks confined at the air–water interface: An ab initio molecular dynamics study10.1021/jp510199k ↗
21. Quantum chemistry in the age of machine learning10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03664 ↗
22. Multi-task Gaussian process upper confidence bound for hyperparameter tuning and its application for simulation studies of additive manufacturing10.1080/24725854.2022.2039813 ↗
23. Machine learning approach for prediction and search: Application to methane storage in a metal–organic framework10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07618 ↗
24. Role of pore chemistry and topology in the CO2 capture capabilities of MOFs: From molecular simulation to machine learning10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02257 ↗
25. Energy-based descriptors to rapidly predict hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks10.1039/c8me00050f ↗
26. Robust machine learning models for predicting high CO2 working capacity and CO2/H2 selectivity of gas adsorption in metal organic frameworks for precombustion carbon capture10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10644 ↗
27. Accelerating discovery of metal–organic frameworks for methane adsorption with hierarchical screening and deep learning10.1021/acsami.0c16516 ↗
28. Accelerating metal–organic framework selection for type III porous liquids by synergizing machine learning and molecular simulation10.1021/acsami.3c12507 ↗
29. Machine learning-assisted discovery of propane-selective metal–organic frameworks10.1021/jacs.3c14610 ↗
30. Metallic metal–organic frameworks predicted by the combination of machine learning methods and ab initio calculations10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01707 ↗
31. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD)10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
32. Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015 ↗
33. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties10.1103/physrevlett.120.145301 ↗
34. MOFormer: Self-supervised transformer model for metal–organic framework property prediction10.1021/jacs.2c11420 ↗
35. A multi-modal pre-training transformer for universal transfer learning in metal–organic frameworks10.1038/s42256-023-00628-2 ↗
36. 2017 · 5998
37. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
38. Generalized gradient approximation made simple10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
39. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
40. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I10.1103/physrevb.44.943 ↗
41. HLE17: An efficient way to predict band gaps of complex materials10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04683 ↗
42. HLE17: An improved local exchange–correlation functional for computing semiconductor band gaps and molecular excitation energies10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01066 ↗
43. On representing chemical environments10.1103/physrevb.87.184115 ↗
44. Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space10.1039/c6cp00415f ↗
45. Big-data science in porous materials: Materials genomics and machine learning10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 ↗
46. Identification of crystalline materials with ultra-low thermal conductivity based on machine learning study10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11610 ↗
47. An invertible crystallographic representation for general inverse design of inorganic crystals with targeted properties10.1016/j.matt.2021.11.032 ↗
48. Topological feature engineering for machine learning based halide perovskite materials design10.1038/s41524-022-00883-8 ↗
49. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
50. Computational 2D materials database: Electronic structure of transition-metal dichalcogenides and oxides10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950 ↗
51. Prediction and classification of formation energies of binary compounds by machine learning: An approach without crystal structure information10.1021/acsomega.1c01517 ↗
52. ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning
53. Imbalanced-learn: A python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning
54. Molecular-level pore tuning in 2D conductive metal–organic frameworks for advanced supercapacitor performance10.1021/jacs.4c11372 ↗
55. 2012
56. Access: Advancing innovation: NSF’S advanced cyberinfrastructure coordination ecosystem: Services & support