Interpretable machine learning for materials discovery: Predicting CO2 adsorption properties of metal–organic frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), as novel porous crystalline materials with high porosity and a large specific surface area, have been increasingly utilized for CO2 adsorption. Machine learning (ML) combined with molecular simulations is used to identify MOFs with high CO2 adsorption capacity from millions of MOF structures. In this study, 23 structural and molecular features and 765 calculated features were proposed for the ML model and trained on a hypothetical MOF dataset for CO2 adsorption at different pressures. The calculated features improved the prediction accuracy of the ML model by 15%–20% and revealed its interpretability, consistent with the analysis of the interaction potential. Subsequently, the importance of the relevant features was ranked at different pressures. Regardless of the pressure, the molecular structure and pore size were the most critical factors. van der Waals force-related descriptors gained more competitive advantages at low pressures, whereas electrical-field-related descriptors gradually dominated at high pressures. Overall, this study provides a novel perspective to guide the initial high-throughput screening of MOFs as high-performance CO2 adsorption materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beihang University 1 , Beijing 100083, China
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong 2 , Hong Kong, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Academic Excellence Foundation of BUAA for PHD Students
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Global carbon budget 202310.5194/essd-15-5301-2023 ↗
2. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model10.1038/35041539 ↗
3. Global carbon budget 202210.5194/essd-14-4811-2022 ↗
4. Global Carbon Budget 202110.5194/essd-14-1917-2022 ↗
5. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt10.1126/science.1152747 ↗
6. Metal-organic frameworks10.1039/b200393g ↗
7. Large-pore apertures in a series of metal-organic frameworks10.1126/science.1220131 ↗
8. Metal–organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: Is the sky the limit?10.1021/ja3055639 ↗
9. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks10.1126/science.1230444 ↗
10. Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions10.1038/ncomms1956 ↗
11. Can metal–organic framework materials play a useful role in large-scale carbon dioxide separations?10.1002/cssc.201000114 ↗
12. MOF Membranes for CO2 capture: Past, present and future10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100026 ↗
13. Carbon dioxide capture in metal–organic frameworks10.1021/cr2003272 ↗
14. Control of pore size and functionality in isoreticular zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and their carbon dioxide selective capture properties10.1021/ja809459e ↗
15. Metal–organic frameworks based on double-bond-coupled di-isophthalate linkers with high hydrogen and methane uptakes10.1021/cm800403d ↗
16. Improving predictions of gas adsorption in metal–organic frameworks with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites: Model potentials, ab initio parameterization, and GCMC simulations10.1021/jp3062527 ↗
17. Recent advances, opportunities, and challenges in high-throughput computational screening of MOFs for gas separations10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213470 ↗
18. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) study on adsorption performance of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) for carbon capture10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00383 ↗
19. Evaluating topologically diverse metal–organic frameworks for cryo-adsorbed hydrogen storage10.1039/c6ee02104b ↗
20. Study of HKUST (Copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate, Cu-btc MOF)-1 metal organic Frameworks for CH4 adsorption: An experimental Investigation with GCMC (grand canonical Monte-Carlo) simulation10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.033 ↗
21. Computational screening and functional tuning of chemically stable metal organic frameworks for I2/CH3I capture in humid environments10.1016/j.isci.2024.109096 ↗
22. Chemical information matters: An e-Research perspective on information and data sharing in the chemical sciences10.1039/c3cs60050e ↗
23. Data science: Accelerating innovation and discovery in chemical engineering10.1002/aic.15192 ↗
24. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials10.1002/aenm.201903242 ↗
25. Combining machine learning and molecular simulations to unlock gas separation potentials of MOF membranes and MOF/polymer MMMs10.1021/acsami.2c08977 ↗
26. Machine learning meets with metal organic frameworks for gas storage and separation10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00191 ↗
27. Molecular modelling and machine learning for high-throughput screening of metal-organic frameworks for hydrogen storage10.1080/08927022.2019.1597271 ↗
28. Advancing CH4/H2 separation with covalent organic frameworks by combining molecular simulations and machine learning10.1039/d3ta02433d ↗
29. Accelerating the selection of covalent organic frameworks with automated machine learning10.1021/acsomega.0c05990 ↗
30. High-throughput screening of covalent organic frameworks for carbon capture using machine learning10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03230 ↗
31. Advances, updates, and analytics for the computation-ready, experimental metal–organic framework database: CoRE MOF 201910.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
32. Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015 ↗
33. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks10.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
34. Structure-mechanical stability relations of metal-organic frameworks via machine learning10.1016/j.matt.2019.03.002 ↗
35. Machine learning and in-silico screening of metal–organic frameworks for O2/N2 dynamic adsorption and separation10.1016/j.cej.2021.131604 ↗
36. Techno-economic analysis of metal–organic frameworks for adsorption heat pumps/chillers: From directional computational screening, machine learning to experiment10.1039/d0ta11747a ↗
37. Metal–organic frameworks for xylene separation: From computational screening to machine learning10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10773 ↗
38. High-performing deep learning regression models for predicting low-pressure CO2 adsorption properties of metal–organic frameworks10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06334 ↗
39. Prediction of MOF performance in vacuum swing adsorption systems for postcombustion CO2 capture based on integrated molecular simulations, process optimizations, and machine learning models10.1021/acs.est.9b07407 ↗
40. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2 ↗
41. Can we open the black box of AI?10.1038/538020a ↗
42. Artificial intelligence for science in quantum, atomistic, and continuum systems
43. Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance measure10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
44. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
45. Identification schemes for metal–organic frameworks to enable rapid search and cheminformatics analysis10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01050 ↗
46. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules10.1021/ci00057a005 ↗
47. The reticular chemistry structure resource (RCSR) database of, and symbols for, crystal nets10.1021/ar800124u ↗
48. Structure–property relationships of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture10.1039/c2ee23201d ↗
49. On the determination of molecular fields. —II. From the equation of state of a gas10.1098/rspa.1924.0082 ↗
50. Mordred: A molecular descriptor calculator10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y ↗
51. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system
52. Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture10.1002/anie.201101891 ↗