journal article·2016-08Open access

MgB2 ultrathin films fabricated by hybrid physical chemical vapor deposition and ion milling

Narendra Acharya, Matthäus A. Wolak, Teng Tan, Namhoon Lee, Andrew C. Lang, Mitra Taheri, Dan Cunnane, Boris. S. Karasik, X. X. Xi

APL Materials· Volume 4· Issue 8

Abstract

In this letter, we report on the structural and transport measurements of ultrathin MgB2 films grown by hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition followed by low incident angle Ar ion milling. The ultrathin films as thin as 1.8 nm, or 6 unit cells, exhibit excellent superconducting properties such as high critical temperature (Tc) and high critical current density (Jc). The results show the great potential of these ultrathin films for superconducting devices and present a possibility to explore superconductivity in MgB2 at the 2D limit.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Iron-based superconductors research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA

Funding

Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.11996710.1063/1.119967 ↗
2. 10.1088/0953-2048/29/2/02300110.1088/0953-2048/29/2/023001 ↗
3. R. A. Wyss, B. S. Karasik, W. R. McGrath, B. Bumble, and H. Leduc, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology (National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesvile, 1999), pp. 215–228.
4. 10.1016/j.physc.2004.02.04310.1016/j.physc.2004.02.043 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.243092810.1063/1.2430928 ↗
6. 10.1109/TASC.2014.236935310.1109/TASC.2014.2369353 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.138886810.1063/1.1388868 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.23010.1038/nphoton.2009.230 ↗
9. 10.1109/TASC.2009.201874010.1109/TASC.2009.2018740 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.218381010.1063/1.2183810 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.479319410.1063/1.4793194 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.11640010.1063/1.116400 ↗
13. 10.1088/0953-2048/21/9/09500910.1088/0953-2048/21/9/095009 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.351872310.1063/1.3518723 ↗
15. Cepek C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 2 · 2002
16. 10.1063/1.162332310.1063/1.1623323 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.153746010.1063/1.1537460 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.153073210.1063/1.1530732 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat70310.1038/nmat703 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.physc.2007.01.02910.1016/j.physc.2007.01.029 ↗
21. 10.1109/TASC.2015.239041510.1109/TASC.2015.2390415 ↗
22. 10.1109/TASC.2014.237443310.1109/TASC.2014.2374433 ↗
23. 10.1021/cg300183410.1021/cg3001834 ↗
24. van der Pauw L. J. · Philips Res. Rep. · 1958 · 13 · 1
25. 10.1088/0953-2048/22/12/12501510.1088/0953-2048/22/12/125015 ↗
26. Kittel C. · 1979
27. 10.1103/physrevb.20.219610.1103/physrevb.20.2196 ↗
28. 10.1088/0953-2048/17/2/00810.1088/0953-2048/17/2/008 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.04700210.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047002 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.16700410.1103/PhysRevLett.88.167004 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.01250410.1103/PhysRevB.71.012504 ↗