journal article·2013-07-01Open access

Effect of dimethylaluminumhydride-derived aluminum oxynitride passivation layer on the interface chemistry and band alignment of HfTiO-InGaAs gate stacks

Gang He, Bin Deng, Hanshuang Chen, Xiaoshuang Chen, Jianguo Lv, Yongqing Ma, Zhaoqi Sun

APL MATERIALS· Volume 1· Issue 1

Abstract

In this letter, the reduction and removal of surface native oxide from as-received InGaAs surface by using dimethylaluminumhydride-derived aluminum oxynitride (AlON) passivation layer prior to HfTiO deposition is proposed to solve Fermi level pinning issue. It has been revealed that complete consumption of native oxides of AsOx and GaOx at the InGaAs surface, but no effect to InOx, has been realized after metalorganic chemical vapor deposition AlON at 300 °C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy observations of HfTiO/InGaAs gate stacks demonstrate that introducing AlON layer can suppress the regrowth of native oxide at the interface. In addition, the dependence of the valence band spectra of HfTiO/InGaAs gate stacks on AlON passivation layer has been discussed in detail.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Anhui University 1 School of Physics and Materials Science, , Hefei 230039, People's Republic of China

Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 National Laboratory for Infrared Physics, , Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, 500 Yutian Road, Shanghai 200083, People's Republic of China

Hefei Normal University 3 Department of Physics and Electronic Engineering, , Hefei 230061, People's Republic of China

Funding

NNSFC

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Exp. · 2012 · 5 · 09100210.1143/APEX.5.091002 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 06210710.1063/1.4742345 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 06290810.1063/1.3475015 ↗
4. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2002 · 23 · 57310.1109/LED.2002.802667 ↗
5. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 33 · 96710.1109/LED.2012.2194690 ↗
6. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2008 · 26 · 69710.1116/1.2905246 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 12450810.1063/1.3266006 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 07190110.1063/1.2883956 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 20290210.1063/1.3033404 ↗
10. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2011 · 29 · 04120610.1116/1.3610972 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 25210410.1063/1.2146060 ↗
12. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 15 · 18810.1016/j.cossms.2011.04.005 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 08410310.1063/1.4759329 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 06210710.1063/1.2968293 ↗
15. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2011 · 29 · 04060310.1116/1.3610989 ↗
16. Microelectron. Reliab. · 2008 · 48 · 52610.1016/j.microrel.2007.11.004 ↗
17. Thin Solid Films · 2009 · 517 · 289210.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.115 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 19290210.1063/1.3515923 ↗
19. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 26 · 10501910.1088/0268-1242/26/10/105019 ↗
20. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. · 2010 · 28 · C3A910.1116/1.3273942 ↗
21. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 256 · 569810.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.091 ↗
22. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 255 · 62810.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.002 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 10290610.1063/1.2961119 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 03290710.1063/1.2838294 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 21210210.1063/1.3268450 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 20290310.1063/1.2388246 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 06350410.1063/1.4745012 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 08290310.1063/1.3556619 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 07290110.1063/1.2883967 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 22210810.1063/1.3148723 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 05291110.1063/1.2966357 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 01411110.1063/1.2213170 ↗
33. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 11290510.1063/1.3229922 ↗
34. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4808243 for the current paper reports the reduction and removal of surface native oxide from as-received InGaAs surface by using dimethylaluminumhydride-derived aluminum oxynitride (AlON) passivation layer prior to HfTiO deposition to solve Fermi level pinning issue. It has been found that complete consumption of native oxides of AsOx and GaOx at the InGaAs surface, but no effect to InOx, has been realized after MOCVD AlON at 300 °C. XPS observations of HfTiO/InGaAs gate stacks demonstrate that introducing AlON layer can suppress the regrowth of native oxide at the interface.