journal article·2009-06

Seismic displacement analysis of a reinforced soil model wall considering progressive development of reinforcement force

C.-C. Huang, H.-J. Wu

Geosynthetics International· Volume 16· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Progressive development of the reinforcement force in a geosynthetic-reinforced model soil retaining wall subjected to irregular ground accelerations was investigated in a pseudo-static-based analytical model. The progressive development of the reinforcement force was expressed as a function of maximum input ground accelerations in the proposed analytical model, which also incorporated a multi-wedge failure mechanism and Newmark's sliding-block theory. This analytical model eliminated a disadvantage inherent in the conventional pseudo-static approach, namely a possible overestimation of the seismic stability of the wall due to the assumption of full mobilization of the reinforcement force regardless of the intensity of ground excitation. It was also found that the value of the critical seismic coefficient [Formula: see text] calculated using a peak internal friction angle (ϕp) and a fully mobilized reinforcement pull-out force can be used to simulate the ultimate state of the model wall when subjected to irregular ground excitations. A softened friction angle of ϕ = 0.9ϕp simulated the wall behavior well when the horizontal displacement of the wall (Dh) was greater than 5% of the wall height (Ht). This finding is consistent with that for a conventional gravity-type soil retaining wall previously reported. A non-uniform distribution of tensile force along the reinforcement, with a peak value at the intersection of the reinforcement and slip surface and a reduced value at the facing-backfill interface was obtained, using a reduction factor of Rr–f = 0.5, based on the calibration of seismic displacements of the tested wall. A reduction factor that accounted for the mobilization of the friction angle along the soil-reinforcement interface, Rr–s, was also calibrated, based on the displacement analysis. It was found that values of Rr–s between 0.7 and 0.8 could be used to represent the pull-out behavior of reinforcement subjected to seismic loading. The proposed method is based on a single set of experimental results and therefore the applicability of the proposed method needs to be verified using more physical tests and/or numerical analyses of various wall geometries and reinforcement configurations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Road, Tainan, Taiwan, 70101, Telephone: , Telefax: ,

Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University No. 1, Ta-Hsueh, Road, Tainan, Taiwan, 70101, Telephone: , Telefax: ,

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Hussaini M. · Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE · 1978 · 104 · 30710.1061/AJGEB6.0000598 ↗
2. Bathurst R. J. Segmental Retaining Walls: Seismic Design Manual, 1998, 1st, National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon, VA: 17.
3. Bathurst R. J. · 1997 · 193
4. 10.1680/gein.5.011710.1680/gein.5.0117 ↗
5. Bathurst R. J. · 1997 · 79
6. 10.1016/0266-352X(95)94918-G10.1016/0266-352X(95)94918-G ↗
7. 10.1680/gein.2007.14.4.21110.1680/gein.2007.14.4.211 ↗
8. 10.1680/gein.2005.12.5.21510.1680/gein.2005.12.5.215 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.00110.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.001 ↗
10. 10.1680/gein.2007.14.4.22810.1680/gein.2007.14.4.228 ↗
11. Gourc J. P. · 1986 · 289
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1108)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1108) ↗
13. 10.3208/sandf1972.34.3_2110.3208/sandf1972.34.3_21 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:1(45)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:1(45) ↗
15. 10.1680/gein.2005.12.4.17610.1680/gein.2005.12.4.176 ↗
16. Huang C. C. · Soils and Foundations · 2005 · 45 · 110.3208/sandf.45.5_1 ↗
17. 10.1680/gein.2006.13.6.21910.1680/gein.2006.13.6.219 ↗
18. 10.1680/gein.2007.14.5.26410.1680/gein.2007.14.5.264 ↗
19. 10.3208/sandf1972.34.2_2710.3208/sandf1972.34.2_27 ↗
20. Huang C. C. · Geosynthetic Engineering Journal, Japan Chapter of International Geosynthetics Society · 2000 · 15 · 264
21. 10.1680/gein.2003.10.1.210.1680/gein.2003.10.1.2 ↗
22. 10.1680/gein.2008.15.5.33310.1680/gein.2008.15.5.333 ↗
23. 10.1680/gein.2008.15.2.10710.1680/gein.2008.15.2.107 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:1(74)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:1(74) ↗
25. JRTRI (Japan Railway Technical Research Institute). Guidelines on Design of Railway Structures: Soil Structures, 1992, Maruzen, Toyko, Japan, 137–162, (in Japanese).
26. Jewell R. A. · 1984 · 70
27. Kato N. · 2002 · 1 · 237
28. Koerner R. M. Designing with Geosynthetics, 1999, 4th, Prentice-Hall: 322–330.
29. 10.1680/gein.5.011510.1680/gein.5.0115 ↗
30. Koseki J. · Soils and Foundations · 1998 · 2 · 20910.3208/sandf.38.Special_209 ↗
31. 10.1680/gein.2004.11.1.110.1680/gein.2004.11.1.1 ↗
32. 10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.35510.1680/gein.2007.14.6.355 ↗
33. 10.1680/geot.1998.48.3.34710.1680/geot.1998.48.3.347 ↗
34. Mononobe N. · 1924 · 10 · 1063
35. 10.1680/gein.5.011610.1680/gein.5.0116 ↗
36. Murata O. · 1994 · 259
37. 10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.13910.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139 ↗
38. 10.1680/gein.2006.13.3.11110.1680/gein.2006.13.3.111 ↗
39. Okabe S. · 1924 · 10 · 1277
40. Tatsuoka F. · Keynote Lecture, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, IS Kyushu '92 · 1993 · 2 · 831
41. 10.3208/sandf1972.26.6510.3208/sandf1972.26.65 ↗
42. Tatsuoka F. · 1998 · 103
43. 10.1002/eqe.429022080610.1002/eqe.4290220806 ↗
44. Whitman R. V. · 1990 · 817