journal article·2020-12Open access

Pullout of geogrids from tire-derived aggregate having large particle size

I. Ghaaowd, J. S. McCartney

Geosynthetics International· Volume 27· Issue 6

Abstract

Although tire-derived aggregate (TDA) has been used as an alternative backfill in geotechnical engineering applications, the interaction between TDA having large particle sizes (e.g. TDA with a maximum particle dimension of 300 mm) and reinforcing geosynthetics has not been studied. This paper presents results from pullout tests on uniaxial and biaxial geogrids embedded in Type B TDA using a new large-scale pullout device having internal areal dimensions that can accommodate TDA layers with a height up to 1470 mm. Normal stresses ranging from 10 to 60 kPa were applied to TDA layers using dead weights atop a rigid plate and the pullout force was applied via hydraulic actuators operated in displacement control to a bolted-epoxy sandwich-type grip mounted on slide bearings that permit pullout displacements of up to 810 mm. The maximum pullout force increased with normal stress, with a displacement at maximum pullout force ranging from 100 to 350 mm. Internal displacements measured using tell-tales indicate gradual mobilization with pullout force, and the TDA layers all contracted during geogrid pullout. Uniaxial and biaxial geogrids with square-shaped apertures showed higher pullout capacity than uniaxial geogrids with rectangular-shaped apertures, but they experienced combined tensile-pullout failure at higher normal stresses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Researcher Associate IV, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

Professor and Department Chair, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.(corresponding author)

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed I. · Transportation Research Record · 1993 · 1422 · 61
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.09110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.091 ↗
3. ASTM D6270-17
4. ASTM D6637-15
5. Bernal, A., Lovell, C. W. & Salgado, R. (1996). Laboratory Study on the Use of Tire Shreds and Rubber-Sand in Backfilled and Reinforced Soil Applications, FHWA/IN/JHRP-96/12, Joint Highway Research Project, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.10.5703/1288284313259 ↗
6. 10.1680/gein.4.010810.1680/gein.4.0108 ↗
7. Bosscher P. J. · Transportation Research Record · 1993 · 1345 · 44
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(295)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(295) ↗
9. CalRecycle · 2015
10. Christopher B. R. · 1990
11. Elias, V., Christopher, B. R. & Berg, R. (2001). Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes, Design & Construction Guidelines, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) SA-00-043. National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
12. 10.1016/0266-1144(93)90003-710.1016/0266-1144(93)90003-7 ↗
13. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (1990). Reinforced Soil Structures: Design and Construction Guidelines, FHWA-RD-89-043. US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
14. FHWA (1996). Laboratory Study on the Use of Tire Shreds and Rubber-Sand in Backfills and Reinforced Soil Applications, FHWA-IN-JHRP-96-12. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
15. Fox P. J. · ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal · 2018 · 41 · 34010.1520/GTJ20160245 ↗
16. Geisler E. · 1989 · 56
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000177510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001775 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:12(1706)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:12(1706) ↗
19. Humphrey D. N. · 2005
20. Humphrey D. N. · 2008 · 59
21. 10.1520/GTJ10838J10.1520/GTJ10838J ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:2(132)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:2(132) ↗
23. 10.1680/gein.3.008110.1680/gein.3.0081 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.000036210.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000362 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000178110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001781 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000067510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000675 ↗
27. 10.1016/0266-1144(96)00027-110.1016/0266-1144(96)00027-1 ↗
28. 10.1139/t99-08510.1139/t99-085 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.00710.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.007 ↗
30. 10.1680/geot.1989.39.3.51110.1680/geot.1989.39.3.511 ↗
31. Senetakis K. · 2009 · 22
32. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.07.00210.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.07.002 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:3(207)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:3(207) ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1109)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1109) ↗
35. 10.1002/eqe.75610.1002/eqe.756 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1061)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1061) ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:3(245)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:3(245) ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000051410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000514 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000100710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001007 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.00910.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.009 ↗
41. Youwai S. · ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal · 2004 · 27 · 26010.1520/GTJ11695 ↗