journal article·2018-11-01

Production of Natural Bamboo Fibers-3: SEM and EDX Analyses of Structures and Properties

Bahrum Prang Rocky, Amanda J. Thompson

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 5· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

This study presents in-depth scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDX) analyses of the surface contour of natural bamboo fibers from Phyllostachys rubromarginata species processed under various eco-friendly conditions. Both fresh and dry bamboo were used. Fresh bamboo provided easier and quicker processing. Two age groups, 6-months to 1-year-old and 2 to 4-year-old bamboo plants, were also studied for fiber output. Subjective visual observations suggested that the age of the bamboo affected fiber yield. The diameter of the bamboo fibers was 10-17 μm, which fits within standard spinning parameters. Analysis showed that the bamboo fibers were well-rounded along the longitudinal direction, unlike bamboo viscose typically found on the market. This article provides a detailed description of some successful processes for bamboo fiber production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bamboo properties and applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The University of Alabama

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/00405000.2018.148263910.1080/00405000.2018.1482639 ↗
2. Rocky B.P., Thompson A. J. Production of Eco-Friendly Natural Bamboo Fiber-2: Assessment of Antibacterial Activity. AATCC Journal of Research, in press.
3. 10.1177/0887302X1244087510.1177/0887302X12440875 ↗
4. 10.1108/0736376111114999210.1108/07363761111149992 ↗
5. Gam H. J. · J. Fash. Mark. Manag. · 2011 · 15 · 178
6. Brosdahl D.J. · J. Text. Apparel Technol. Manag. · 2010 · 6
7. Nasser H. El. What's in style: Eco-friendly, green fashion. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/04/28/the-rise-of-green-fashion/1996773/ (accessed October 2017).
8. Butler S. Ethical shopping growing in popularity, survey suggests. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/aug/19/ethical-shopping-growing-popularity-fairtrade (accessed October 2017).
9. Eco-Friendly Trends Report: Spring Edition https://www.movaglobes.com/blog/eco-friendly-trends-report-spring-edition/ (accessed October 2017).
10. 10.1007/s10668-005-8506-510.1007/s10668-005-8506-5 ↗
11. Steffen D., Marin A.W., Müggler I. R. Bamboo: A Holistic Approach to a Renewable Fibre for Textile Design. 10th European Academy of Design Conference, Gothenburg, Germany. 2013, pp 1–14.
12. 10.3109/10242422.2012.65045010.3109/10242422.2012.650450 ↗
13. Witayakran S., Haruthaithanasan M., Agthong P., Thinnapatanukul T. Green Production of Natural Bamboo Fibers for Textiles. International Textiles and Costume Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 2013; pp 1–6.
14. Bestrank B. 7 Eco Friendly Reasons to Go Retro with Bamboo. https://www.simplychild.co.za/7-eco-friendly-reasons-to-go-retro-with-bamboo/(accessed May 2016).
15. 10.1080/00405000.2014.88987210.1080/00405000.2014.889872 ↗
16. Özmen N. · BioResources · 2013 · 8 · 75310.15376/biores.8.1.1361-1373 ↗
17. Rowell R. M. · 2013
18. Fu J. · Fibres Text. East. Eur. · 2012 · 90 · 13
19. Waite M. · J. Text. Apparel, Technol. Manag. · 2010 · 6 · 1
20. 10.1177/004051750933763310.1177/0040517509337633 ↗
21. 10.1177/002199830933935210.1177/0021998309339352 ↗
22. Ma X. · BioResources · 2011 · 6 · 142810.15376/biores.6.2.1428-1439 ↗
23. Atanda J. · Case Stud. Constr. Mater. · 2015 · 3 · 33
24. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
25. Rosenberg T. · 2012
26. Hardin I.R. · AATCC Review · 2009 · 9 · 33
27. Bralla J. G. · 2007
28. Morgan P. · 2005 · 15010.1201/9781420028744 ↗
29. Perepelkin K. E. · Fibre Chem. · 2008 · 40 · 910.1007/s10692-008-9014-9 ↗
30. ChaoJun W. · BioResources · 2014 · 9 · 3449
31. Batalha L.A.R. · BioResources · 2011 · 7 · 64010.15376/biores.7.1.640-651 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7RA12086A10.1039/C7RA12086A ↗
33. 10.13075/mp.5893.0060010.13075/mp.5893.00600 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10570-009-9299-810.1007/s10570-009-9299-8 ↗
35. Phong N.T. · J. Mater. Sci. Res. · 2012 · 1 · 144
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.023 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.01510.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.015 ↗
38. 10.1177/073168441559130210.1177/0731684415591302 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.021 ↗
40. Chaowana P. · J. Mater. Sci. Res. · 2013 · 2 · 90
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.013 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10853-013-7951-z10.1007/s10853-013-7951-z ↗
43. Biologically Inspired Textiles; Abbot A., Ellison M., Eds. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2008.
44. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.01110.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.011 ↗
45. ASTM Standard E2228-10. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010, www.astm.org.
46. AATCC Technical Manual; AATCC: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2015, Vol. 90, pp 60–79.
47. 10.1080/00405000.2011.61474210.1080/00405000.2011.614742 ↗