Analysis of the low-stress mechanical properties of station wear uniforms of firefighters
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-stress mechanical properties are essential in enhancing comfort, durability, and aesthetic attributes. These properties significantly influence fabrics’ overall performance and tactile comfort in various applications. Meta-aramid yarn was used to develop the fire protective station wear of various weave structures like plain, basket, and ripstop. The linear density of the yarn was 29.5 Tex, and three different PPCs (picks per centimetre) of 15.7, 18.1, and 20.5 were considered for the manufacture of the fabrics. The low-stress mechanical properties such as tensile properties (tensile linearity and tensile energy), shear properties (shear hysteresis (2HG and 2HG5) and shear rigidity), bending properties (bending rigidity, bending hysteresis), and compressional energy were investigated using the Kawabata evaluation system (KES). The effect of weave structures on the low-stress mechanical properties of various fabrics was analysed. The linearity of the tensile load extension curve (LT) and the tensile resilience (RT) increased with the increase in weft density for all the weave structures. It was observed that increasing the PPC from 15.7 to 20.5 improved the linearity of the load-extension curve, with LT values rising from 0.38 to 0.58 for plain weave, and increased tensile energy (WT) from 3.55 to 7.3 g.cm/cm 2 for plain weave and from 3.32 to 6.55 g.cm/cm 2 for basket weave. Surface roughness (SMD) also decreased, with values dropping from 10.39 µm to 8.81 µm for plain weave. A complex relationship between weave structure and PPC needs to be considered when optimizing the design and performance of station wear fabrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Department of Textile and Fibre Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India
Department of Fabric Engineering, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Tejgaon, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Department of Textile Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Santosh, Tangail, Bangladesh
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1528083722111761010.1177/15280837221117610 ↗
2. 10.1080/00405000.2022.215671710.1080/00405000.2022.2156717 ↗
3. 10.1177/1528083721105458210.1177/15280837211054582 ↗
4. 10.1080/00405000.2022.212465010.1080/00405000.2022.2124650 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.07510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.075 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.00105510.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.001055 ↗
7. 10.1080/0040500890865918410.1080/00405008908659184 ↗
8. Coletta C, Arons IJ, Ashley LE. Minimum standards on structural fire fighting protective clothing and equipment: a guide for fire service education and procurement. Fire Fighter Health and Safety U. S. Fire Administration, 1993.
9. 10.1177/1528083722109405710.1177/15280837221094057 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10694-019-00930-910.1007/s10694-019-00930-9 ↗
11. 10.1080/00405000.2023.220191310.1080/00405000.2023.2201913 ↗
12. 10.31881/TLR.2024.06610.31881/TLR.2024.066 ↗
13. 10.1177/1528083722114921710.1177/15280837221149217 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-0233/18/11/04010.1088/0957-0233/18/11/040 ↗
15. 10.1080/00405000.2021.198219010.1080/00405000.2021.1982190 ↗
16. 10.1080/0040516010868895110.1080/00405160108688951 ↗
17. Hes L, Oglakcioglu N, Marmarali A, et al. The effect of moisture on friction coefficient of elastic knitted fabrics. Tekst ve Konfeksiyon 2008; 18: 206–210.
18. 10.1080/15440478.2021.188704410.1080/15440478.2021.1887044 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175920620020510.1177/004051759206200205 ↗
20. Kondo S. The possibility of the stick-slips depends on abradants. The stick–slips tend to occur on fabrics where the construction of a fabric weave is regular and periodic to the frictional direction. The stick–slips also tend to occur on nylon 6 and polyester. Jpn Res Assn Text End-Uses 2002; 43: 305–321.
21. 10.1520/JTE12665J10.1520/JTE12665J ↗
22. Amaravathi TBC. Effect of using micro denier polyester filament yarns on low stress mechanical properties of fabrics. Iconic Res Eng J 2022; 5: 88–92.
23. 10.1080/00405000.2016.125512310.1080/00405000.2016.1255123 ↗
24. 10.1177/00405175870570030110.1177/004051758705700301 ↗
25. 10.1177/004051751038010810.1177/0040517510380108 ↗
26. Hasani H. Effect of different processing stages on mechanical and surface properties of cotton knitted fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2010; 35: 139–144.
27. Quaynor L, Takahasi H, Nakajima M. Effects of laundering on the surface properties and dimensional of plain knitted fabrics. Text Res J 1999; 756: 28–35.
28. 10.1177/00405175860560090910.1177/004051758605600909 ↗
29. Das A, Alagirusamy R. Science of clothing comfort. Woodhead, 2010.
30. ASTM. Standard test method for end (warp) and pick (filling) count of woven fabrics. ASTM International, 2003, pp.1–3.
31. ASTM. ASTM D1777-96-Standard test method for thickness of textile materials. ASTM International, 2009, pp.415–419.
32. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.00610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.006 ↗
33. 10.1177/152808372094944610.1177/1528083720949446 ↗
34. Dapkūnienė K, Strazdienė E. Influence of layer orientation upon textile systems tensile properties. Part 1. Investigation of tensile strain and resilience. Mater Sci 2006; 12: 1–6.
35. 10.1007/s12221-013-0669-310.1007/s12221-013-0669-3 ↗
36. Ancutiene K Koldinska M Havelka A. Investigation of tensile resilience properties of stretch denim fabrics. 2017; 42: 175–182.
37. 10.1007/s12221-018-8167-210.1007/s12221-018-8167-2 ↗
38. Shanbeh M, Safar Johari M, Zarrebini M, et al. Analysis of shear characteristics of woven fabrics and their interaction with fabric integrated structural factors. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2019; 14: 1558925019867520.
39. 10.1177/0887302X950130020810.1177/0887302X9501300208 ↗
40. 10.1007/s12221-024-00499-310.1007/s12221-024-00499-3 ↗
41. 10.1177/00405175000700031010.1177/004051750007000310 ↗
42. 10.1080/00405000.2020.182933010.1080/00405000.2020.1829330 ↗
43. 10.1177/0040517524124181810.1177/00405175241241818 ↗
44. 10.1108/0955622001037785010.1108/09556220010377850 ↗
45. 10.1080/15440478.2019.169798910.1080/15440478.2019.1697989 ↗
46. 10.1177/00405175020720050210.1177/004051750207200502 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.05.00210.1016/j.ergon.2005.05.002 ↗
48. 10.1177/0040517521101068310.1177/00405175211010683 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12221-014-1985-y10.1007/s12221-014-1985-y ↗
50. 10.1080/00405000.2017.132081710.1080/00405000.2017.1320817 ↗