DataVXAdvances in ManufacturingPaper
journal article·2026-06-03

Integration of abrasive machining theory and motion compensation strategies for honing of 9310 steel

Ying-Ying Yuan, Chang-Yong Yang, Peng Wang, Peng-Yu Zhang, Yu-Can Fu, Jiu-Hua Xu, Wen-Feng Ding, Yong-Chun Sun

Advances in Manufacturing
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Metals & alloys

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang CY, Wang Z, Su H et al (2023) Numerical analysis and experimental validation of surface roughness and morphology in honing of Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy. Adv Manuf 11:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-022-00422-010.1007/s40436-022-00422-0 ↗
2. Yang C, Su H, Gao S et al (2021) Characterization and life prediction of single-pass honing tool for fuel injection nozzle. Chin J Aeronaut 34:225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.00810.1016/j.cja.2020.08.008 ↗
3. Grabon W, Pawlus P, Wos S et al (2017) Effects of honed cylinder liner surface texture on tribological properties of piston ring-liner assembly in short time tests. Tribol Int 113:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.11.02510.1016/j.triboint.2016.11.025 ↗
4. Mezghani S, Demirci I, Yousfi M et al (2013) Running-in wear modeling of honed surface for combustion engine cylinderliners. Wear 302:1360–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.01.02610.1016/j.wear.2013.01.026 ↗
5. Goeldel B, El Mansori M, Dumur D (2012) Macroscopic simulation of the liner honing process. CIRP Ann 61:319–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.04410.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.044 ↗
6. Goeldel B, Mansori ME, Dumur D (2013) Simulation of roughness and surface texture evolution at macroscopic scale during cylinder honing process. Procedia CIRP 8:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.06010.1016/j.procir.2013.06.060 ↗
7. Joliet R, Kansteiner M (2013) A high resolution surface model for the simulation of honing processes. Adv Mater Res 769:69–76. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.769.6910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.769.69 ↗
8. Joliet R, Kansteiner M, Kersting P (2015) A process model for force-controlled honing simulations. Procedia CIRP 28:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.00910.1016/j.procir.2015.04.009 ↗
9. Reizer R, Pawlus P, Wieczorowski M (2023) Simulation of plateau-honed cylinder liner surface texture creation using superimposition approach. Precis Eng 82:10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.02.00810.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.02.008 ↗
10. Zhou Z, Zhang X, Lv K et al (2018) Predicting microscale cross-hatched surface texture in engine cylinder bore. Procedia CIRP 71:272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.00810.1016/j.procir.2018.05.008 ↗
11. Zhou Z, Zhang X, Lv K et al (2019) Simulating the sequential honing process of engine cylinder bore by modeling abrasives in honing stone. In: ASME 14th international manufacturing science and engineering conference, 10–14 June, Erie, Pennsylvania, USA. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2019-304910.1115/MSEC2019-3049 ↗
12. Kumar S, Paul S (2012) Numerical modelling of ground surface topography: effect of traverse and helical superabrasive grinding with touch dressing. Prod Eng Res Devel 6:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0370-110.1007/s11740-012-0370-1 ↗
13. Chen H, Tang J (2015) A model for prediction of surface roughness in ultrasonic-assisted grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:643–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6482-310.1007/s00170-014-6482-3 ↗
14. Tsybenko H, Xia W, Dehm G et al (2020) On the commensuration of plastic plowing at the microscale. Tribol Int 151:106477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.10647710.1016/j.triboint.2020.106477 ↗
15. Chen N, Li L, Wu J et al (2019) Research on the ploughing force in micro milling of soft-brittle crystals. Int J Mech Sci 155:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.004 ↗
16. Wan M, Ma YC, Feng J et al (2016) Study of static and dynamic ploughing mechanisms by establishing generalized model with static milling forces. Int J Mech Sci 114:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.05.01010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.05.010 ↗
17. Bhokse V, Chinchanikar S, Anerao P et al (2015) Experimental investigations on chip formation and plowing cutting forces during hard turning. Mater Today Proc 2:3268–3276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.13810.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.138 ↗
18. Laakso SVA, Agmell M, Stahl JE (2018) The mystery of missing feed force–the effect of friction models, flank wear and ploughing on feed force in metal cutting simulations. J Manuf Process 33:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.02410.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.024 ↗
19. Yao Y, Liu G, Zhai J et al (2025) Chip formation and surface integrity investigation considering the minimum uncut chip thickness in micro-helical milling. J Market Res 36:2272–2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.30410.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.304 ↗
20. Dong Z, Wang H, Qi Y et al (2023) Effects of minimum uncut chip thickness on tungsten nano-cutting mechanism. Int J Mech Sci 237:107790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10779010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107790 ↗
21. Wojciechowski S, Krajewska-Śpiewak J, Maruda RW et al (2023) Study on ploughing phenomena in tool flank face-workpiece interface including tool wear effect during ball-end milling. Tribol Int 181:108313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10831310.1016/j.triboint.2023.108313 ↗
22. de Paiva SG, de Oliveira D, Malcher L (2023) Numerical study of the minimum uncut chip thickness in micro-machining of Inconel 718 based on Johnson-Cook isothermal model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127:2707–2721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11573-010.1007/s00170-023-11573-0 ↗
23. Liu H, Guo Y, Li D et al (2021) Material removal mechanism of FCC single-crystalline materials at nano-scales: chip removal & ploughing. J Mater Process Technol 294:117106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11710610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117106 ↗
24. Hu X, Xi C, Yu B (2014) Research on cylindricity prediction and process parameter optimization in honing based on response surface methodology. China Mech Eng 25:2098–2101, 2106. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2014.15.02110.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2014.15.021 ↗
25. Buj-Corral I, Sender P, Luis-Pérez CJ (2023) Multi-objective optimization of tool wear, surface roughness, and material removal rate in finishing honing processes using adaptive neural fuzzy inference systems. Tribol Int 182:108354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10835410.1016/j.triboint.2023.108354 ↗
26. Van AL, Nguyen TT (2022) An energy efficiency-based optimization of the rough honing process of hardened 5150 alloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 237:336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408922110666110.1177/09544089221106661 ↗
27. Xi C, Hu X, Zhang Z (2011) Research for cylindricity prediction model of inner-hole honing. In: 2011 Second international conference on mechanic automation and control engineering, 15‒17 July, Hohhot, pp 1506–1509. https://doi.org/10.1109/MACE.2011.598723410.1109/MACE.2011.5987234 ↗
28. Nguyen TT, Vu TC, Duong QD (2020) Multi-responses optimization of finishing honing process for surface quality and production rate. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02690-y10.1007/s40430-020-02690-y ↗
29. Tang T, Liu C, Wang R (2021) Optimization of honing surface roughness of carburized holes based on GRA-RSM. Mach 9:291. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines911029110.3390/machines9110291 ↗
30. Chohan JS, Kumar R, Singh S et al (2023) Prediction of response parameters during magnetic assisted honing process using artificial neural network. AIP Conf Proc 2535:050002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.011392410.1063/5.0113924 ↗
31. Sivatte-Adroer M, Llanas-Parra X, Buj-Corral I et al (2016) Indirect model for roughness in rough honing processes based on artificial neural networks. Precis Eng 43:505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.09.00410.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.09.004 ↗
32. Buj-Corral I, Sender P, Luis-Pérez CJ (2023) Modeling of surface roughness in honing processes by using fuzzy artificial neural networks. J Manuf Mater Process 7:23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp701002310.3390/jmmp7010023 ↗
33. Zhang X, Zhang XP (2023) Free-floating dynamic material removal mechanism of the honing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127:4473–4489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11760-z10.1007/s00170-023-11760-z ↗
34. Grezina AV, Igumnov LA, Metrikin VS et al (2024) Dynamics of honing of deep cylindrical holes with memory effects in the frictional interaction. In: Balandin D, Barkalov K, Meyerov I (eds) Mathematical modeling and supercomputer technologies, Springer Nature, Switzerland, Cham, pp 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52470-7_110.1007/978-3-031-52470-7_1 ↗
35. Zhang X, Wang X, Wang D et al (2016) Methodology to improve the cylindricity of engine cylinder bore by honing. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(3):031008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403462210.1115/1.4034622 ↗
36. Gao L, Zhang X, Yao Z (2013) Trajectory reconstruction and precision control of cylinder bore honing of automobile engine. Mech Des and Res 29(1):75–79. https://doi.org/10.13952/j.cnki.jofmdr.2013.01.00510.13952/j.cnki.jofmdr.2013.01.005 ↗
37. Muratov KR, Ablyaz TR, D’yakonov AA, et al (2023) Improving hole geometry in honing. Russ Engin Res 43:1246–1248. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X2310022210.3103/S1068798X23100222 ↗
38. Lu Y, Li J, Liang R et al (2020) Investigation on the effect of honing parameters on cylindricity of engine cylinder liner. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:3111–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06321-710.1007/s00170-020-06321-7 ↗
39. Min H, Ning H, Gong J et al (2021) Motion simulation analysis and process practice in honing process. Mech Des and Manuf 306(4):248–252. https://doi.org/10.19356/j.cnki.1001-3997.2021.04.05710.19356/j.cnki.1001-3997.2021.04.057 ↗
40. He H, Yang C, Su H et al (2022) Research on prediction of honing material removal volume of aviation electro-hydraulic servo valve sleeve. Aeronaut Manuf Technol 65:87–94. https://doi.org/10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2022.04.08710.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2022.04.087 ↗
41. Zhang X, Zhou Z, Yao Z et al (2020) Analytically predicating the multi-dimensional accuracy of the honed engine cylinder bore. J Tribol 142:091201. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404667710.1115/1.4046677 ↗
42. Zhou Z, Zhang X, Yao Z et al (2017) Predicting multi-scale dimensional accuracy of engine cylinder by honing. In: ASME 2017 12th international manufacturing science and engineering conference collocated with the JSME/ASME 2017 6th international conference on materials and processing, 4–8 June, Los Angeles, California. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2017-267310.1115/MSEC2017-2673 ↗
43. Zhang X, Wang X, Wang D et al (2017) Methodology to improve the cylindricity of engine cylinder bore by honing. J Manuf Sci Eng 139:031008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403462210.1115/1.4034622 ↗
44. Klein S, Fang S, Bähre D (2017) Analysis of different surface structures of hard metal guiding stones in the honing process. Procedia Manuf 10:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.05510.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.055 ↗
45. Schmitt C, Bähre D (2014) Analysis of the process dynamics for the precision honing of bores. Procedia CIRP 17:692–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.05510.1016/j.procir.2014.01.055 ↗
46. Schmitt C, Bähre D (2013) An approach to the calculation of process forces during the precision honing of small bores. Procedia CIRP 7:282–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.04810.1016/j.procir.2013.05.048 ↗