Quantitative surface roughness analysis of selective masking electrochemical polishing in additive manufactured lattices using a novel X-ray computed tomography based method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Zadpoor AA (2019) Mechanical performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomater 85:41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2018.12.03810.1016/J.ACTBIO.2018.12.038 ↗
2. Ajdari A, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A (2011) Dynamic crushing and energy absorption of regular, irregular and functionally graded cellular structures. Int J Solids Struct 48:506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2010.10.01810.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2010.10.018 ↗
3. Heinl P, Müller L, Körner C et al (2008) Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater 4:1536–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2008.03.01310.1016/J.ACTBIO.2008.03.013 ↗
4. Chen LY, Liang SX, Liu Y et al (2021) Additive manufacturing of metallic lattice structures: unconstrained design, accurate fabrication, fascinated performances, and challenges. Mater Sci Eng R 146:100648. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSER.2021.10064810.1016/J.MSER.2021.100648 ↗
5. Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. Int Sch Res Notices 2012:208760. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/20876010.5402/2012/208760 ↗
6. Maconachie T, Leary M, Lozanovski B et al (2019) SLM lattice structures: properties, performance, applications and challenges. Mater Des 183:108137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2019.10813710.1016/J.MATDES.2019.108137 ↗
7. Pourrahimi S, Hof LA (2024) On the post-processing of complex additive manufactured metallic parts: a review. Adv Eng Mater 26:2301511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20230151110.1002/ADEM.202301511 ↗
8. Sanaei N, Fatemi A (2020) Analysis of the effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of powder bed fusion additive manufactured metals. Theor Appl Fract Mech 108:102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TAFMEC.2020.10263810.1016/J.TAFMEC.2020.102638 ↗
9. Pegues J, Roach M, Williamson RS et al (2018) Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Fatigue 116:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2018.07.01310.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2018.07.013 ↗
10. Leon A, Aghion E (2017) Effect of surface roughness on corrosion fatigue performance of AlSi10Mg alloy produced by selective laser melting (SLM). Mater Charact 131:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2017.06.02910.1016/J.MATCHAR.2017.06.029 ↗
11. Feninat FE, Laroche G, Fiset M et al (2002) Shape memory materials for biomedical applications. Adv Eng Mater 4(3):91–10410.1002/1527-2648(200203)4:3<91::AID-ADEM91>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
12. Pourrahimi S, Milanese J, Habibnejad-Korayem M et al (2025) Impact of powder reuse on corrosion properties in Ti-6Al-4V alloy parts fabricated by laser beam powder bed fusion. Prog Addit Manuf 10(12):11849–1186710.1007/s40964-025-01319-7 ↗
13. Kum CW, Wu CH, Wan S et al (2020) Prediction and compensation of material removal for abrasive flow machining of additively manufactured metal components. J Mater Process Technol 282:116704. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2020.11670410.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2020.116704 ↗
14. Bhaduri D, Penchev P, Batal A et al (2017) Laser polishing of 3D printed mesoscale components. Appl Surf Sci 405:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.01.21110.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.01.211 ↗
15. Pyka G, Kerckhofs G, Papantoniou I et al (2013) Surface roughness and morphology customization of additive manufactured open porous Ti6Al4V structures. Materials 6:4737–4757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma610473710.3390/ma6104737 ↗
16. Tyagi P, Goulet T, Riso C et al (2019) Reducing the roughness of internal surface of an additive manufacturing produced 316 steel component by chempolishing and electropolishing. Addit Manuf 25:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.00110.1016/j.addma.2018.11.001 ↗
17. Demisse W, Xu J, Rice L et al (2023) Review of internal and external surface finishing technologies for additively manufactured metallic alloys components and new frontiers. Prog Addit Manuf 8(6):1433–145310.1007/s40964-023-00412-z ↗
18. Dong G, Marleau-Finley J, Zhao YF (2019) Investigation of electrochemical post-processing procedure for Ti-6Al-4V lattice structure manufactured by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(9):3401–3417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03996-510.1007/s00170-019-03996-5 ↗
19. ASTM B374−06 Standard terminology relating to electroplating, 2019
20. Pourrahimi S, Hof LA (2024) On the optimization of roughness and corrosion resistance of laser beam powder bed fusion fabricated Ti-6Al-4V parts—an electrochemical approach. Adv Eng Mater 26(23):2401395. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20240139510.1002/ADEM.202401395 ↗
21. Han W, Fang F (2019) Fundamental aspects and recent developments in electropolishing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 139:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.01.00110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.01.001 ↗
22. Yang G, Wang B, Tawfiq K et al (2017) Electropolishing of surfaces: theory and applications. Surf Eng 33(2):149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2016.119845210.1080/02670844.2016.1198452 ↗
23. Chang S, Liu A, Ong CYA et al (2019) Highly effective smoothening of 3D-printed metal structures via overpotential electrochemical polishing. Mater Res Lett 7(7):282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.160164510.1080/21663831.2019.1601645 ↗
24. Pyka G, Burakowski A, Kerckhofs G et al (2012) Surface modification of Ti6Al4V open porous structures produced by additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater 14(6):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20110034410.1002/ADEM.201100344 ↗
25. Yang L, Gu H, Lassell A (2014) Surface treatment of Ti6Al4V parts made by powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes using electropolishing. In: paper presented at solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium. 4–6 August, Austin Texas, USA
26. Pourrahimi S, Vanderesse N, Bocher P et al (2023) Effects of post-processing on surface roughness of additively manufactured TI5553 lattice structures using X-ray computed microtomography. In: proceedings of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering International Congress / Computational Fluid Dynamics Canada International Congress, 28–31 May, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.17118/11143/2108210.17118/11143/21082 ↗
27. Lynch ME, Williams K, Cabrera M et al (2021) Surface finishing of additively manufactured IN718 lattices by electrochemical machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113(3):967–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-020-05699-810.1007/S00170-020-05699-8 ↗
28. McCrabb H, Hall TD, Snyder S et al (2015) Through-mask electroetching for industrial manufacturing. Meet Abstr MA2015-01:1245. https://doi.org/10.1149/MA2015-01/17/124510.1149/MA2015-01/17/1245 ↗
29. Romankiw LT (1997) A path: from electroplating through lithographic masks in electronics to LIGA in MEMS. Electrochim Acta 42(20/22):2985–3005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(97)00146-110.1016/S0013-4686(97)00146-1 ↗
30. Baldhoff T, Nock V, Marshall AT (2018) Through-mask electrochemical micromachining. J Electrochem Soc 165(16):E841–E85510.1149/2.1341814jes ↗
31. Mirabal A, Loza-Hernandez I, Clark C et al (2023) Roughness measurements across topographically varied additively manufactured metal surfaces. Addit Manuf 69:103540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2023.10354010.1016/J.ADDMA.2023.103540 ↗
32. Van der Jeught S, Dirckx JJJ (2016) Real-time structured light profilometry: a review. Opt Lasers Eng 87:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2016.01.01110.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2016.01.011 ↗
33. Chappard D, Degasne I, Huré G et al (2003) Image analysis measurements of roughness by texture and fractal analysis correlate with contact profilometry. Biomaterials 24(8):1399–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00524-010.1016/S0142-9612(02)00524-0 ↗
34. Steinhilber F, Lachambre J, Coeurjolly D et al (2024) A methodology for the 3D characterization of surfaces using X-ray computed tomography: application to additively manufactured parts. Addit Manuf 84:104144. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2024.10414410.1016/J.ADDMA.2024.104144 ↗
35. Thompson A (2019) Surface texture measurement of metal additively manufactured parts by X-ray computed tomography. Dissertation, University of Nottingham. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26204.0320710.13140/RG.2.2.26204.03207 ↗
36. Townsend A, Pagani L, Scott P et al (2017) Areal surface texture data extraction from X-ray computed tomography reconstructions of metal additively manufactured parts. Precis Eng 48:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRECISIONENG.2016.12.00810.1016/J.PRECISIONENG.2016.12.008 ↗
37. Kruth JP, Bartscher M, Carmignato S et al (2011) Computed tomography for dimensional metrology. CIRP Ann 60(2):821–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRP.2011.05.00610.1016/J.CIRP.2011.05.006 ↗
38. Kerckhofs G, Pyka G, Moesen M et al (2013) High-resolution microfocus X-ray computed tomography for 3D surface roughness measurements of additive manufactured porous materials. Adv Eng Mater 15(3):153–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20120015610.1002/ADEM.201200156 ↗
39. Van Bael S, Desmet T, Chai YC et al (2013) In vitro cell-biological performance and structural characterization of selective laser sintered and plasma surface functionalized polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 33(6):3404–3412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2013.04.02410.1016/J.MSEC.2013.04.024 ↗
40. Vanderesse N, Bocher P, Nuño N et al (2022) On the characterization of roughness and geometrical irregularities of additively manufactured single titanium-alloy struts. Addit Manuf 54:102731. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2022.10273110.1016/J.ADDMA.2022.102731 ↗
41. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) surface texture: areal, part 2: terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO 25178-2, 2021
42. Jin S, Wu AT, Lu XY et al (2013) Effect of cathode shape on vertical buffered electropolishing for niobium SRF cavities. Appl Surf Sci 280:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2013.04.10210.1016/J.APSUSC.2013.04.102 ↗
43. Fotovvati B, Namdari N, Dehghanghadikolaei A et al (2022) Review—electropolishing of additive manufactured metal parts. J Electrochem Soc 169:043510. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/AC645010.1149/1945-7111/AC6450 ↗
44. Naghavi SA, Wang H, Varma SN et al (2022) On the morphological deviation in additive manufacturing of porous Ti6Al4V scaffold: a design consideration. Materials 15(14):4729. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA15144729/S110.3390/MA15144729/S1 ↗
45. Kim D, Son K, Sung D et al (2015) Effect of added ethanol in ethylene glycol-NaCl electrolyte on titanium electropolishing. Corros Sci 98:494–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.05.05710.1016/j.corsci.2015.05.057 ↗
46. Aulbach L, Salazar BF, Lu M et al (2017) Non-contact surface roughness measurement by implementation of a spatial light modulator. Sensors 17(3):596. https://doi.org/10.3390/S1703059610.3390/S17030596 ↗
47. Schafer RW (2011) What is a savitzky-golay filter? IEEE Signal Process Mag 28(4):111–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2011.94109710.1109/MSP.2011.941097 ↗
48. Landolt D (1987) Fundamental aspects of electropolishing. Electrochim Acta 32(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(87)87001-910.1016/0013-4686(87)87001-9 ↗
49. Tyagi SA, Manjaiah M (2024) Printability, post-processing and mechanical behaviour of sub-millimetre sized SS 17–4PH TPMS lattice structures. Mater Today Commun 38:108267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2024.10826710.1016/J.MTCOMM.2024.108267 ↗
50. Demir AG, Previtali B (2017) Additive manufacturing of cardiovascular CoCr stents by selective laser melting. Mater Des 119:338–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2017.01.09110.1016/J.MATDES.2017.01.091 ↗