Experimental measurement of acoustically induced surface vibration with different soil conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Experimental measurement is performed to investigate the acoustically induced surface vibration with different soil conditions. Using the method of scanning detection and analyzing the three-dimensional (3D) characteristic diagram of surface vibration, the influence of soil properties, such as porosity and humidity, upon the signal of acoustically induced surface vibration is measured. The experimental results show that the surface vibration reduces with the decrease of soil porosity and reduces a little with the increase of soil humidity; and with a big plastic landmine buried, the surface vibration enhances significantly. It indicates that the signal of acoustically induced surface vibration mainly depends on soil porosity and mechanical effect of buried objects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Underwater Acoustics Research · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Bass HE, Bolen LN (1980) Coupling of airborne sound into the earth frequency dependence. J Acoust Soc Am 67:1502–150610.1121/1.384312 ↗
2. Sabatier JM, Bass HE, Bolen LN et al (1986) The interaction of airborne sound with the porous ground: the theoretical formulation. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1345–135210.1121/1.393662 ↗
3. Sabatier JM, Bass HE, Bolen LN et al (1986) Acoustically induced seismic waves. J Acoust Soc Am 80:646–64910.1121/1.394058 ↗
4. Hickey CJ, Sabatier JM (1997) Measurements of two types of dilatational waves in an air-filled unconsolidated sand. J Acoust Soc Am 102(1):128–13610.1121/1.419770 ↗
5. Sabatier JM, Xiang N (2001) An investigation of acoustic-to-seismic coupling to detect buried antitank landmines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(6):1146–115410.1109/36.927429 ↗
6. Xiang N, Sabatier JM (2003) An experimental study on antipersonnel landmine detection using acoustic-to-seismic coupling. J Acoust Soc Am 113(3):1333–134110.1121/1.1543554 ↗
7. Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid I: low-frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 28(2):168–17810.1121/1.1908239 ↗
8. Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid II: higher frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 28(2):179–19110.1121/1.1908241 ↗
9. Dvorkin J, Nur A (1993) Dynamic poroelastic: a unified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms. Geophysics 58(4):524–53310.1190/1.1443435 ↗
10. Stern M, Bedford A, Millwater HR (1985) Wave reflection from a sediment layer with depth-dependent properties. J Acoust Soc Am 77(5):1781–178810.1121/1.391927 ↗
11. Berryman JG (1981) Elastic wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous media. J Acoust Soc Am 69(2):416–42410.1121/1.385457 ↗
12. Denneman AIM, Drijkoningen GG, Smeulders DMJ et al (2002) Special section-seismic signatures of fluid transport dynamic effects of fluid: theory and modeling. Geophysics 67(1):282–29110.1190/1.1451800 ↗
13. Mochizuki S (1982) Attenuation in partially saturated rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 87(B10):8598–860410.1029/JB087iB10p08598 ↗
14. Santos JE, Douglas J, Corberó J et al (1990) A model for wave propagation in porous medium saturated by a two-phase fluid. J Acoust Soc Am 87(4):1439–144810.1121/1.399440 ↗
15. Beresnev IA (2013) Seismic study of the low-permeability volume in southern France karst systems. Geophysics 79(1):1–1310.1190/geo2013-0200.1 ↗
16. Cai YQ, Li BZ, Xu CJ (2006) Analysis of elastic wave propagation in sand stone saturated by two immiscible fluids. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(10):2009–2016
17. Ding W, Wu WW, Wang C et al (2014) Propagation characteristics of seismic waves in shallow soil with the unsaturated three-phase poroelastic model. Acta Phys Sin 63(22):22430110.7498/aps.63.224301 ↗
18. Robert WH, Kenneth DR (2005) Standoff acoustic laser technique to locate buried landmines. Linc Lab J 15(1):3–22
19. Wang C, Li XF, Yu YJ et al (2010) Analysis of soil-landmine resonance model. Acta Phys Sin 59(9):6319–632510.7498/aps.59.6319 ↗
20. Wang C, Zhou YQ, Shen GW et al (2013) Numerical analysis of the resonance mechanisms of the lumped parameter system model for acoustic landmines detection. Chin Phys B 22(12):12460110.1088/1674-1056/22/12/124601 ↗
21. Wang C, Zhou YQ, Shen GW et al (2013) Impact of buried objects on acoustic-to-seismic coupling efficiency. J Tianjin Univ 46(6):498–502
22. Ding W, Shen GW, Wang C et al (2014) Acoustic-to-seismic coupling based discrimination for non-metallic mine detection. Optics Precis Eng 22(5):1331–133810.3788/OPE.20142205.1331 ↗
23. Chen C, Liu D, Zhang HR et al (2015) Application of equivalent circuit analysis method in investigation of acoustic resonance mines detection model. J Electron Meas Instrum 29(6):874–879
24. Wang C, Xu LL, Zhu J et al (2016) A novel integrated fiber-optic interferometer model and its application in micro-displacement measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 86:125–13110.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.05.012 ↗
25. Ding H, Huang LL, Mao XY et al (2016) Primary resonance of traveling viscoelastic beam under internal resonance. Appl Math Mech (Engl Ed). doi: 10.1007/s10483-016-2152-610.1007/s10483-016-2152-6 ↗