Material removal rate model for high-shear and low-pressure grinding with body-armor-like wheel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao B, Xiao GD, Ding WF et al (2020) Effect of grain contents of a single-aggregated cubic boron nitride grain on material removal mechanism during Ti-6Al-4V alloy grinding. Ceram Int 46:17666–1767410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.069 ↗
2. Li G, Kang RK, Wang H et al (2023) A grinding force model and surface formation mechanism of cup wheels considering crystallographic orientation. J Mater Process Technol 322:11818710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118187 ↗
3. Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay AB, Paul S (2008) Modelling of specific energy requirement during high-efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48:1242–125310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.03.008 ↗
4. Ezugwu EO (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45:1353–136710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.02.003 ↗
5. Kopac J, Krajnik P (2006) High-performance grinding-a review. J Mater Process Tech 175(1/5):278–28410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.010 ↗
6. Zhang SQ, Yang ZX, Jiang RS et al (2021) Effect of creep feed grinding on surface integrity and fatigue life of Ni3Al based superalloy IC10. Chin J Aeronaut 34:438–44810.1016/j.cja.2020.02.025 ↗
7. Mohamed AO, Bauer R, Warkentin A (2013) Application of shallow circumferential grooved wheels to creep-feed grinding. J Mater Process Tech 213(5):700–70610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.029 ↗
8. Li BZ, Ni JM, Yang JG et al (2014) Study on high-speed grinding mechanisms for quality and process efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:813–81910.1007/s00170-013-5297-y ↗
9. Wu Y, Lu P, Lin FH et al (2020) Explosion accident analysis of ultra-high-speed grinding wheel. Eng Fail Anal 122:10520910.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105209 ↗
10. Bell A, Jin T, Stephenson DJ (2011) Burn threshold prediction for high efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(6):433–43810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.01.006 ↗
11. Nan H, Axinte D (2016) Textured grinding wheels: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 109:8–3510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.07.001 ↗
12. Singh H, Sharma VS, Dogra M (2020) Exploration of graphene assisted vegetables oil based minimum quantity lubrication for surface grinding of Ti-6Al-4V-eLi. Tribol Int 144:10611310.1016/j.triboint.2019.106113 ↗
13. Ge YC, Zhu ZW, Zhu YW (2019) Electrochemical deep grinding of cast nickel-base superalloys. J Manuf Process 47:291–29610.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.007 ↗
14. Tian YB, Li LG, Fan S et al (2021) A novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding method using specially developed abrasive tools. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 235:166–17210.1177/0954405420949106 ↗
15. Zhang Y, Li B, Yang J et al (2018) Modeling and optimization of alloy steel 20CrMnTi grinding process parameters based on experiment investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:1859–187310.1007/s00170-017-1335-5 ↗
16. Zhang YZ, Xu XP (2019) Influence of surface topography evolution of grinding wheel on the optimal material removal rate in grinding process of cemented carbide. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 80:130–14310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.01.009 ↗
17. Yan SJ, Xu XH, Yang ZY et al (2019) An improved robotic abrasive belt grinding force model considering the effects of cut-in and cut-off. J Manuf Process 37:496–50810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.029 ↗
18. Zhang XQ, Chen HB, Xu JJ et al (2018) A novel sound-based belt condition monitoring method for robotic grinding using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Mater Process Tech 260:9–1910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.05.013 ↗
19. Wang NN, Zhang GP, Ren LJ et al (2021) Vision and sound fusion-based material removal rate monitoring for abrasive belt grinding using improved LightGBM algorithm. J Manuf Process 66:281–29210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.014 ↗
20. Ren LJ, Wang NN, Wang XH et al (2023) Modeling and analysis of material removal depth contour for curved-surfaces abrasive belt grinding. J Mater Process Tech 316:11794510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.117945 ↗
21. Qu C, Lv YJ, Yang ZY et al (2019) An improved chip-thickness model for surface roughness prediction in robotic belt grinding considering the elastic state at contact wheel-workpiece interface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:3209–321710.1007/s00170-019-04332-7 ↗
22. Lv YJ, Peng Z, Qu C et al (2020) An adaptive trajectory planning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of blade leading and trailing edges based on material removal profile model. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 66:10198710.1016/j.rcim.2020.101987 ↗
23. Li LF, Ren XK, Feng HJ et al (2021) A novel material removal rate model based on single grain force for robotic belt grinding. J Manuf Process 68(3):1–12
24. Qi JD, Zhang DH, Li S et al (2016) A micro-model of the material removal depth for the polishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:2759–277010.1007/s00170-016-8385-y ↗
25. Wang GL, Wang YQ, Xu ZX (2009) Modeling and analysis of the material removal depth for stone polishing. J Mater Process Tech 209:2453–246310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.041 ↗
26. Wang YJ, Huang Y, Chen YX et al (2016) Model of an abrasive belt grinding surface removal contour and its application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:2113–212210.1007/s00170-015-7484-5 ↗
27. Pandiyan V, Caesarendra W, Tjahjowidodo T et al (2017) Predictive modelling and analysis of process parameters on material removal characteristics in abrasive belt grinding process. Appl Sci 7(4):363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app704036310.3390/app7040363 ↗
28. Gao KY, Chen HB, Zhang XQ et al (2019) A novel material removal prediction method based on acoustic sensing and ensemble XGBoost learning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:217–23210.1007/s00170-019-04170-7 ↗
29. Ren LJ, Zhang GP, Wang Y et al (2019) A new in-process material removal rate monitoring approach in abrasive belt grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:2715–272610.1007/s00170-019-04124-z ↗
30. Tian YB, Li LG, Han JG et al (2021) Development of novel high-shear and low-pressure grinding tool with flexible composite. Mater Manuf Process 36:479–48710.1080/10426914.2020.1843673 ↗
31. Liu B, Tian YB, Han JG et al (2022) Development of a new high-shear and low-pressure grinding wheel and its grinding characteristics for Inconel 718 alloy. Chin J Aeronaut 35:278–28610.1016/j.cja.2021.08.013 ↗
32. Yao WF, Lyu BH, Zhang TQ et al (2023) Effect of elastohydrodynamic characteristics on surface roughness in cylindrical shear thickening polishing process. Wear 530–531:20502610.1016/j.wear.2023.205026 ↗
33. Johnson KL (2012) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
34. Popov VL (2010) Contact mechanics and friction: physical principles and applications. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-10803-7 ↗
35. Chen JP, Peng YN (2023) Super hard and brittle material removal mechanism in fixed abrasive lapping: theory and modeling. Tribology Int 184:10849310.1016/j.triboint.2023.108493 ↗
36. Johnson KL (1970) The correlation of indentation experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 18:115–12610.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
37. Johnson K (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
38. Doman DA, Warkentin A, Bauer R (2006) A survey of recent grinding wheel topography models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:343–35210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.05.013 ↗
39. Li M, Lyu BH, Yuan JL et al (2015) Shear-thickening polishing method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 94:88–9910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.04.010 ↗