Predicting fatigue life of automotive adhesive bonded joints: a data-driven approach using combined experimental and numerical datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. da Silva LFM, Öchsner A, Adams RD (2018) Introduction to adhesive bonding technology. In: da Silva LFM, Öchsner A, Adams RD (eds) Handbook of adhesion technology, Springer, Cham, pp 1–710.1007/978-3-319-55411-2 ↗
2. Schijve J (2009) Fatigue of joints. In: fatigue of structures and materials. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 499–53310.1007/978-1-4020-6808-9 ↗
3. Wit FM, Poulis JA (2012) Joining technologies for automotive components. In: Rowe J (ed) Advanced materials in automotive engineering, Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 315–32910.1533/9780857095466.315 ↗
4. Satheeshkumar V, Narayanan RG, Gunasekera JS (2023) Sustainable manufacturing. In: sustainable manufacturing processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 53–11210.1016/B978-0-323-99990-8.00007-2 ↗
5. Abdel WMM (2012) Fatigue in adhesively bonded joints: a review. ISRN Mater Sci 2012:1–2510.5402/2012/746308 ↗
6. Da Costa Mattos HS, Monteiro AH, Palazzetti R (2012) Failure analysis of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Mater Des 33:242–24710.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.031 ↗
7. Beber VC, Schneider B (2020) Fatigue of structural adhesives under stress concentrations: notch effect on fatigue strength, crack initiation and damage evolution. Int J Fatigue 140:105824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10582410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105824 ↗
8. Donough MJ, Gunnion AJ, Orifici AC et al (2015) Plasticity induced crack closure in adhesively bonded joints under fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue 70:440–45010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.07.003 ↗
9. Sonsino C (2007) Course of SN-curves especially in the high-cycle fatigue regime with regard to component design and safety. Int J Fatigue 29:2246–225810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.015 ↗
10. He X (2011) A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:248–26410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.006 ↗
11. Nolting A, Underhill P, DuQuesnay D et al (2008) Fatigue behavior of adhesively bonded aluminium double strap joints. J Astm Int. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI10155910.1520/JAI101559 ↗
12. Gao ZZ, Yue ZF (2007) Fatigue failure of polyethylene methacrylate in adhesive assembly under unsymmetrical bending. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 48:89–9610.1016/j.tafmec.2007.04.009 ↗
13. Romanko J, Liechti KM, Knauss WG (1984) Life prediction methodology for adhesively bonded joints. In: Mittal KL (ed) Adhesive joints: formation, characteristics, and testing, Springer, Boston, pp 567–58610.1007/978-1-4613-2749-3_34 ↗
14. Kumar S, Pandey PC (2011) Fatigue life prediction of adhesively bonded single lap joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:43–4710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.10.002 ↗
15. Shenoy V, Ashcroft IA, Critchlow GW et al (2010) Unified methodology for the prediction of the fatigue behaviour of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Fatigue 32:1278–128810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.013 ↗
16. Khoramishad H, Crocombe AD, Katnam KB et al (2010) Predicting fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints using a cohesive zone model. Int J Fatigue 32:1146–115810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
17. Abdel WMM, Ashcroft IA, Crocombe AD et al (2004) Finite element prediction of fatigue crack propagation lifetime in composite bonded joints. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:213–22210.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.002 ↗
18. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–44410.1038/nature14539 ↗
19. Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H et al (2018) Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559:547–55510.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
20. Bhadeshia HKDH (2009) Neural networks and information in materials science. Stat Anal Data Min 1:296–30510.1002/sam.10018 ↗
21. Gan L, Wu H, Zhong Z (2022) Fatigue life prediction considering mean stress effect based on random forests and kernel extreme learning machine. Int J Fatigue 158:106761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10676110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106761 ↗
22. Liang T, Yin A, Pan M et al (2022) Gaussian process flow and physical model fusion driven fatigue evaluation model using Kalman filter. Int J Fatigue 165:107182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10718210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107182 ↗
23. Karolczuk A, Skibicki D, Pejkowski L (2022) Gaussian process for machine learning-based fatigue life prediction model under multiaxial stress–strain conditions. Materials 15:7797. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1521779710.3390/ma15217797 ↗
24. Farid M (2022) Data-driven method for real-time prediction and uncertainty quantification of fatigue failure under stochastic loading using artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression. Int J Fatigue 155:106415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10641510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106415 ↗
25. Lyathakula KR, Yuan FG (2021) A probabilistic fatigue life prediction for adhesively bonded joints via ANNs-based hybrid model. Int J Fatigue 151:106352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10635210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106352 ↗
26. Chen Q, Guo H, Avery K et al (2017) Fatigue performance and life estimation of automotive adhesive joints using a fracture mechanics approach. Eng Fract Mech 172:73–8910.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.005 ↗
27. Prastyo PH, Ardiyanto I, Hidayat R (2020) A review of feature selection techniques in sentiment analysis using filter, wrapper, or hybrid methods. In: 2020 6th international conference on science and technology, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2020, pp 1−6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST50505.2020.973288510.1109/ICST50505.2020.9732885 ↗
28. Mangalathu S, Hwang SH, Jeon JS (2020) Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) approach. Eng Struct 219:110927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11092710.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110927 ↗
29. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
30. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–3210.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
31. Tognan A, Laurenti L, Salvati E (2022) Contour method with uncertainty quantification: a robust and optimized framework via Gaussian process regression. Exp Mech 62:1305–131710.1007/s11340-022-00842-w ↗