Improving RSW nugget diameter prediction method: unleashing the power of multi-fidelity neural networks and transfer learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical Systems and Laser Technology · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Makoto K, Yoshimasa F, Kazuhiro O et al (1996) Estimation of tensile shear strength of spot welded joint of steel sheets. Q J Jpn Weld Soc 14(4):754–76110.2207/qjjws.14.754 ↗
2. Oikawa H, Murayama G, Hiwatashi S et al (2007) Resistance spot weldability of high strength steel sheets for automobiles and the quality assurance of joints. Weld World 51(3):7–1810.1007/BF03266555 ↗
3. Pouranvari M, Asgari HR, Mosavizadch SM et al (2007) Effect of weld nugget size on overload failure mode of resistance spot welds. Sci Technol Weld Joi 12(3):217–22510.1179/174329307X164409 ↗
4. Sun DQ, Lang B, Sun DX et al (2007) Microstructures and mechanical properties of resistance spot welded magnesium alloy joints. Mater Sci Eng A 460:494–49810.1016/j.msea.2007.01.073 ↗
5. Sim J, Kim KY (2018) Hybrid nugget diameter prediction for resistance spot welding. Procedia Manuf 17:395–40210.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.062 ↗
6. Birada AK, Dabade BM (2020) Optimization of resistance spot welding process parameters in dissimilar joint of MS and ASS 304 sheets. Mater Today Proc 26(2):1284–128810.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.256 ↗
7. Luo Y, Li CT, Xu HB (2009) Regression modeling and process analysis of resistance spot welding on galvanized steel sheet. Mater Des 30(7):2547–255510.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.031 ↗
8. Pandya KS, Grolleau V, Roth CC et al (2020) Fracture response of resistance spot welded dual phase steel sheets: experiments and modeling. Int J Mech Sci 187:105869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10586910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105869 ↗
9. Kumar A, Ghosh GK, Panda S et al (2020) Numerical simulation of weld nugget in resistance spot welding process. Mater Today Proc 27:2958–296310.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.901 ↗
10. Andersson O, Melander A (2015) Prediction and verification of resistance spot welding results of ultra-high strength steels through FE simulations. Model Numer Simul Mater Sci 5(1):26–37
11. Eisazadeh H, Hamedi M, Halvaee A (2010) New parametric study of nugget size in resistance spot welding process using finite element method. Mater Des 31(1):149–15710.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.042 ↗
12. Hussein HK, Shareef IR, Zayer IA (2019) Prediction of spot welding parameters using fuzzy logic controlling. Eastern-Eur J Enterp Technol 5(2):57–6410.15587/1729-4061.2019.172642 ↗
13. Thongchai A, Kawin S, Phisut A et al (2014) Resistance spot welding optimization based on artificial neural network. Int J Manuf Eng 2014:154784. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/15478410.1155/2014/154784 ↗
14. Mallaradhya HM, Kumar MV, Chandra MSV (2022) Optimization of parameters and prediction of response values using regression and ANN model in resistance spot welding of 17-4 precipitation hardened stainless steel. J Adv Manuf Syst 21(2):275–29110.1142/S0219686722500111 ↗
15. Tan Y, Fang P, Zhang Y et al (1999) Evaluating nugget sizes of spot welds by using artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computational intelligence, theory and applications: fuzzy days, 25‒28 May, Springer, Berlin
16. Panza L, Bruno G, Antal G et al (2024) Machine learning tool for the prediction of electrode wear effect on the quality of resistance spot welds. Int J Interact Des Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01733-710.1007/s12008-023-01733-7 ↗
17. Kitano H, Nakamura T (2018) Combined artificial neural network and least squares method for exploring relationships between welding conditions and weld characteristics. Weld Lett. https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws.36.5WL10.2207/qjjws.36.5WL ↗
18. Kitano H, Nakamura T (2019) Automatic derivation of empirical formulas for characteristics of weld joints using machine learning based technique. J Jpn Weld Soc 88(7):532–53510.2207/jjws.88.532 ↗
19. Kitano H (2019) Numeric law discovery and knowledge extraction from welding phenomena using machine learning technique. Mater Jpn 58(8):449–45210.2320/materia.58.449 ↗
20. Kitano H, Sato A, Iyota M et al (2021) Investigation of relationship between resistance spot welding condition and nugget shape by utilizing machine learning based technique. Weld Int 33(4/6):223–230
21. Gavidel SR, Jeremy L (2019) Performance analysis and comparison of machine learning algorithms for predicting nugget width of resistance spot welding joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:3779–379610.1007/s00170-019-03821-z ↗
22. Li M, Liu Z, Huang L et al (2022) Automatic identification framework of the geometric parameters on self-piercing riveting cross-section using deep learning. J Manuf Process 83:427–43710.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.020 ↗
23. Zhang Z, Wen G, Chen S (2019) Weld image deep learning-based on-line defects detection using convolutional neural networks for Al alloy in robotic arc welding. J Manuf Process 45:208–21610.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.023 ↗
24. Dai W, Li D, Tang D et al (2021) Deep learning assisted vision inspection of resistance spot welds. J Manuf Process 62(8):262–27410.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.015 ↗
25. Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2017) Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:1029–105010.1007/s00158-016-1550-y ↗
26. Zhang X, Xie F, Ji T et al (2021) Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 373:113485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11348510.1016/j.cma.2020.113485 ↗
27. Zhang Y, Kim NH, Park C et al (2017) Multi-fidelity surrogate based on single linear regression. AIAA J 56(12):1–9
28. Li M, Liu Z, Huang L et al (2023) Multi-fidelity data-driven optimization design framework for self-piercing riveting process parameters. J Manuf Process 99:812–82410.1016/j.jmapro.2023.05.103 ↗